Re: Chance for YOU to help end the diabetes care postcode lo
Neil Walters said:
It is of course possible that the type of patient who comes here manages their condition better than others and therefore is not representative of the norm - it is indicative but not an objective al
Yes that could be true. I think it might also be the case that individuals are not always included because of admin and other problems. Just thnik of the massive changes in the NHS over the past few years.
It is probably quite unlikely that many Practices are failing to provide all of the tests and others may just be misinterpreing the requirments - just as respondents may be misinterpreing what actually goes on at t heir reviews.
I am conviced , for example, that if asked,, my surgery would say that individual targets and plans are discussed with the patient at the annual review. I have to answer from my point of view that this does not happen as no "discussion " is allowed.
My first thought when DUK began this campaign was -to misquote the Bard- "full of "soundbites " and fury - signifying - nothing."
I can now , however, see a point in it. There may well be pockets of ignorance and neglect or lack of provision which the local areas can't deal with. DUK is a powerful organisation and can help wih this. Even if the numbers are small the people concerned are as important as anyone else and a great deal of relevant informaion which could help everyone may emerge.
If the siuation is found to be generally excellent with everyone complying then that is reassuring for all - and DUK can move on to something more relevant and perhaps choose future campaigns on a different basis.
Either way here is nothing to lose. I suspect that the "postcode "lottery afffects people more in the detail of these checks eg
a chirpodist or the nurse , where the blood samples are taken , how much the GP ineracts wi patients.
So really its a win-win sitution for us and so much easier to comoplete in the format above.
In case anyone wonders - I gave nmy answers elsewhere.