I notice it was posted by "Prof Grant" - I'm guessing maybe Prof Grant Schofield? In which case, George Henderson may also be involved in the research behind the post as he is with most of the Prof's posts.Interesting viewpoint
https://alivebynature.com/how-the-war-on-cholesterol-caused-our-diabetes-epidemic/
Not sure of the source but seems well referenced.. just don't buy anything!
I notice it was posted by "Prof Grant" - I'm guessing maybe Prof Grant Schofield? In which case, George Henderson may also be involved in the research behind the post as he is with most of the Prof's posts.
Dr Aseem Malhotra speaks about it often too.Saw it on Newsnight and read the BBC News story. Systemic corruption in medical research? Never
My Cardiologist was well aware of this information and we went for surgery instead, I know someone (T1D) who had a stent or two fitted two years ago, and he is now up for them to be replaced already, Stents have a very limited lifespan anyway because they fur up far quicker than the original plumbing."Trust me I'm a cardiologist".... or maybe not..
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51539112
https://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2010/12/15/how-long-can-a-stent-stay-in-the-body/Stents have a very limited lifespan anyway
Where's the evidence for that?
He is an active cardiologist so should know something about it.Dr Aseem Malhotra speaks about it often too.
https://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2010/12/15/how-long-can-a-stent-stay-in-the-body/
https://www.healthline.com/health/restenosis#causes
And information given by my cardiology team. The orofessor in charge is an eminent heart surgeon at the regional heart specialist centre. They are in a good position to know whether their procedures are effective since thay also deal with the rejects, They make more money from surgery, but have a much faster turnroud from stenting,
Yes it might, but a bit of a problem if it is not. Certainly some people have stents lasting 30 years or more. Its all about risk reduction. if 40% of stent ops have an adverse event then that seems quite high risk. I am used to working to six sigma events, which is 1 event in 10^9,It's might be a generalisation
https://blogs.jefferson.edu/atjeff/2012/07/10/how-long-do-heart-stents-last/
Sits back an looks a bit smug but sad for those who think I am the crazy one for decrying this foul BigPharma con.To put it politely, what the **** is going on with statins? As if I didn’t know!
Sounds like the odds of being hit by a lightning bolt when crossing the road.Yes it might, but a bit of a problem if it is not. Certainly some people have stents lasting 30 years or more. Its all about risk reduction. if 40% of stent ops have an adverse event then that seems quite high risk. I am used to working to six sigma events, which is 1 event in 10^9,
Two years ago there was a study done in an Australian hospital that analysed post mortems following various CV suspected deaths, and the main finding was that the majority of them had low or medium cholesterol levels, and that the ones with high TC were also associated strongly with smoking or alcoholism. This study was suppressed by the authorities who instigated court procedings shortly after it was published. I did provide a link in a thread here at the time but it was fairly swiftly de-activated by Error 404.
So far as I know neither the Noakes or Fettke trials looked at statins and cholesterol.Maybe Australia or South Africa.?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?