• Guest, the forum is undergoing some upgrades and so the usual themes will be unavailable for a few days. In the meantime, you can use the forum like normal. We'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

Type 2 Cholesterol

K

Koalajane

Well-Known Member
Hi just had my cholesterol results back and suggestion that I should take statins.
What do you think
Serum cholesterol. 5.1 mmol/L
Serum triglycerides 0.9 mmol/L
Serum HDL cholesterol level 2.39 mmol/L
Serum cholesterol/HDL ratio 2.1 ratio
NonHDL cholesterol level 2.7 mmol/L
 
Koalajane said:
Hi just had my cholesterol results back and suggestion that I should take statins.
What do you think
Serum cholesterol. 5.1 mmol/L
Serum triglycerides 0.9 mmol/L
Serum HDL cholesterol level 2.39 mmol/L
Serum cholesterol/HDL ratio 2.1 ratio
NonHDL cholesterol level 2.7 mmol/L
Click to expand...

Those results are first class. Why in this world did your GP suggest statins? Oh ..... I know. Because they offer statins to all diabetics no matter how good their cholesterol is. Offer being the operative word. Well done on achieving those numbers,.
 
Bluetit1802 said:
Those results are first class. Why in this world did your GP suggest statins? Oh ..... I know. Because they offer statins to all diabetics no matter how good their cholesterol is. Offer being the operative word. Well done on achieving those numbers,.
Click to expand...

I think the statins were suggested because my total cholesterol is 5.1 and should be 5 or under!
 
Koalajane said:
I think the statins were suggested because my total cholesterol is 5.1 and should be 5 or under!
Click to expand...
Your doctor is obviously ignorant of the fact that your lipid panel showed a snapshot of your cholesterol at that precise moment in time.. it goes up and down like blood sugar throughout the day depending on all sorts of things..including the sort of things you ate in the days prior to the test. It's far more dynamic than most GP's appreciate so to prescribe medication on the back of a snapshot reading is in my view kind of crazy.
 
Koalajane said:
I think the statins were suggested because my total cholesterol is 5.1 and should be 5 or under!
Click to expand...

Rubbish! Even NICE don't recommend doctors looking at total cholesterol any more. They look at the components - HDL, LDL, Triglycerides, and the ratios. Your doctor is way out of date, and possibly ticking boxes somewhere instead of doing a bit of research. .... 5.1????? 0.1 above the standard? Ridiculous.

Just for your benefit
HDL is all good cholesterol and yours is brilliant
Triglycerides are the baddies and yours are brilliant

Try completing this
http://www.hughcalc.org/chol-si.php
 
Bluetit1802 said:
Rubbish! Even NICE don't recommend doctors looking at total cholesterol any more. They look at the components - HDL, LDL, Triglycerides, and the ratios. Your doctor is way out of date, and possibly ticking boxes somewhere instead of doing a bit of research. .... 5.1????? 0.1 above the standard? Ridiculous.

Just for your benefit
HDL is all good cholesterol and yours is brilliant
Triglycerides are the baddies and yours are brilliant

Try completing this
http://www.hughcalc.org/chol-si.php
Click to expand...

Thanks for that, the ratios all come out as ideal. No statins for me
 
Back
Top