Last week, I encountered a Diabetes Consultant and took the opportunity to ask him if he knew of any decent reading into normo-glycaemia, as I have really struggled to find decent robust papers. He admitted there isn't a lot really, because of the range nature of "normal", and in terms of research funding there aren't huge pots of money available to reseach "no problem".
What he did comment was that non-diabetics tend to routinely run in the 3-6.5 ranges, although he would routinely discount any readings of an hour or so, or less, after eating, as non-diabetics can easily reach double figures in this time-frame, but snap back quickly. I explained my discoveries using the Libre (which he was familiar with, and loved) and he said my lows and feeling fine were just fine - especially being so slight. He was a big fan of Professor Taylor, loved the impact discoveries - i.e. significant (using Taylor's words and inferences) weight loss being key to returning normo-glaycaemia for the lucky ones, although not at all supporting the VLC approach.
I think eating to one's meter is all very well, provided that reference is overlaid with how the subject feels at any given time. I would be unlikely to be driven to eat by a number on my meter, but I would, and am, driven to eat by being starving hungry, coupled with a low number. It is my belief my system has recovered sufficiently well to look after me. I really hope it can go on that way, if I can continue to look after it, by not allowing the poundage to slip back on.