Me too. Even if I trusted it I haven't got a smartphone or a laptop, just a good old fashioned steam powered desktop computer.Well the ridiculous thing is to go digital the letter says
"Use the camera app on your smartphone and hold over the QR code. This opens a secure Patient Communications Hub website that's unique to you, where you can select your preferred communications format by following the simple instructions."
I don't have a smartphone, just an Android and there is no website/email link on the letter. I'm far from a technophobe but I'm baffled!!
Are there Android phones that aren't smartphones? If it has a touchscreen, camera and connects to the internet it's a smartphone.I don't have a smartphone, just an Android
Are there Android phones that aren't smartphones? If it has a touchscreen, camera and connects to the internet it's a smartphone.
I suggest you download Google Lens which works very well as a QR code reader and has other very useful features.
Maybe it's what you meant but I open the Google Lens app (I have an icon on the home screen) and it activates the camera and I point it at a QR code. I have found Google Lens useful for identifying plants, finding where to buy things I have seen, bringing up QR code menus, all sorts of things.Right have done it. My phone had Google Lens anyway but just hovering your camera (open of course) over the code doesn't work, for me anyway.
Maybe it's what you meant but I open the Google Lens app (I have an icon on the home screen) and it activates the camera and I point it at a QR code. I have found Google Lens useful for identifying plants, finding where to buy things I have seen, bringing up QR code menus, all sorts of things.
Worrying article in Guardian today about CQC inspections in care homes that had covid in building. Inspectors were moving between care homes with covid without being tested. Some inspectors got covid.
The reasoning behind situation was that inspectors needed to inspect hygiene procedures in homes. Inspectors trained in infection control and had full access to relevant PPE. They were also socially distanced from staff and residents.
This must enrage all those who have been unable to see loved ones in care homes.
Of course there are many unknowns. You can only assume procedures were followed to the letter. I assume you cant say for certain infections acquired in care homes rather than their weekly shop etc.
That said even pre covid inspectors were a discrete presence,they seem a sensible bunch who wouldnt put themselves or others at risk.
If it was the case that they followed procedures fully and did acquire infection in home it highlights the need for rapid tests for visitors.
On a personal level it supports my instincts that even with PPE and social distancing my work place was not a good place to be!
Still,its a one of article that raises more questions than gives answers, especially with the advisability of Christmas get togethers.
Inspectors moving between Covid-hit England care homes without testsIs there evidence to support that those inspectors who contracted COVID contracted it IN those care homes? Bearing in mind how prevalent COVID is and has been in some areas, I'm guessing they could also have been exposed elsewhere.
Of course, I have no idea what the answer to that question is, but I'd be grateful if you would post a link to the article you cite for others to read too.
Sorry,get the whole article above but copy and paste always seems unpredictable via phone.Is there evidence to support that those inspectors who contracted COVID contracted it IN those care homes? Bearing in mind how prevalent COVID is and has been in some areas, I'm guessing they could also have been exposed elsewhere.
Of course, I have no idea what the answer to that question is, but I'd be grateful if you would post a link to the article you cite for others to read too.
https://www.theguardian.com/society...en-covid-hit-england-care-homes-without-testsIs there evidence to support that those inspectors who contracted COVID contracted it IN those care homes? Bearing in mind how prevalent COVID is and has been in some areas, I'm guessing they could also have been exposed elsewhere.
Of course, I have no idea what the answer to that question is, but I'd be grateful if you would post a link to the article you cite for others to read too.
Update.I was due to go back weeks ago (hospital,frontline cleaning infection.).
I half wanted to go back for the boredom. I tried following government guidelines.(which employer seem unaware of)Work from home not possible, cant redeploy myself to another role to work from home.
Then it says i should be offered safest available on site role available. When I have suggested what I thought would be "safe"(even safe roles impossibility to totally distance from people). I was told I couldn't return until occupational health appointment.
This is now drawing near via telephone appointment and the end of my sick note (which I didnt want to put in the last time) the appointment is a few days before my return so dont know if anything will get sorted. So getting anxious again especially in the knowledge a lot of my colleagues have got antibodies eg had the virus, possibly from work.
Diabetes uk mention furlough and extending it for clinically vulnerable people yet i have never even been offered furlough.
The guidance also states "As for any workplace risk, employers must take into account specific duties to those with protected characteristics, including, for example, pregnant women who are entitled to a suspension on full pay if suitable roles cannot be found". My employer/occupation health said type 2 isn't a disability but hypertension maybe but is hard to prove you suffer from it. (I have type 2, metformin sitagliptin, and hypertension ramipril)
Also interesting is how the virus is more contagious/lethal in different areas of Britain for example Wales government advises you not to leave home to work at all
I redeployed in the end to safer environment, similar job and safer location.I was due to go back weeks ago (hospital,frontline cleaning infection.).
I half wanted to go back for the boredom. I tried following government guidelines.(which employer seem unaware of)Work from home not possible, cant redeploy myself to another role to work from home.
Then it says i should be offered safest available on site role available. When I have suggested what I thought would be "safe"(even safe roles impossibility to totally distance from people). I was told I couldn't return until occupational health appointment.
This is now drawing near via telephone appointment and the end of my sick note (which I didnt want to put in the last time) the appointment is a few days before my return so dont know if anything will get sorted. So getting anxious again especially in the knowledge a lot of my colleagues have got antibodies eg had the virus, possibly from work.
Diabetes uk mention furlough and extending it for clinically vulnerable people yet i have never even been offered furlough.
The guidance also states "As for any workplace risk, employers must take into account specific duties to those with protected characteristics, including, for example, pregnant women who are entitled to a suspension on full pay if suitable roles cannot be found". My employer/occupation health said type 2 isn't a disability but hypertension maybe but is hard to prove you suffer from it. (I have type 2, metformin sitagliptin, and hypertension ramipril)
Also interesting is how the virus is more contagious/lethal in different areas of Britain for example Wales government advises you not to leave home to work at all
Well, this would get me back at work:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...us-drivers-prioritised-Covid-vaccine-50s.html
But it's all guesswork.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?