- Messages
- 215
- Type of diabetes
- Type 1
So, I've just had an interesting first appointment with the dietician at the diabetic clinic. For background, I was diagnosed 6 weeks ago with diabetes. The DSN couldn't say which, but as BG was 26+ and Ketones were 1.1 she said they would treat it as if it were type 1.
The dietician found my blood results, and thankfully GAD and c-peptide came back negative so she suggested maybe coming off the insulin in favour of dietary remedy (as it was probably type 2, which I suspected from the outset), but she consulted a nurse who said no, stick with the insulin for now (2x14 Levemir plus 6 Novorapid per meal).
She asked me how I was getting on. I pointed out my relatively stable fasting BG numbers in the 4-7 range, that I was feeling much better, that I had lost a little weight and that I had removed any sugar from my diet and eating meals that had no simple carbs with some complex carbs.
She seemed very surprised and asked why I had changed to this policy. I just pointed out that, in the absence of any other dietary advice from the NHS, I was going off what I read here, that it would make control easier.
Her take on it was that it screwed up the diagnosis if I was changing my dietary habits, that it was dangerous whilst I was still taking fixed bolus (if no carbs then no Novorapid), and that I would end up replacing my energy source with less healthy dietary fats, and that it may cause ketosis, which would exacerbate complications. She's not suggesting to carb count or modify insulin injections, but to reintroduce more normal ratios of pasta, rice and bread, but smaller portions of everything, especially saturated fats. She's also suggesting to test the post-meal (+2hr) BG levels to ensure that the rise is no more than 3 mmol/l.
Her point was that if it's type 1, reducing carbs makes no difference anyway and if it's type 2, everything will need to be reduced, including sat fats.
To be honest, all this makes sense. So why is there such an emphasis on low-carbohydrate diets on these forums as a way of controlling diabetes?
I feel a bit conflicted now.
The dietician found my blood results, and thankfully GAD and c-peptide came back negative so she suggested maybe coming off the insulin in favour of dietary remedy (as it was probably type 2, which I suspected from the outset), but she consulted a nurse who said no, stick with the insulin for now (2x14 Levemir plus 6 Novorapid per meal).
She asked me how I was getting on. I pointed out my relatively stable fasting BG numbers in the 4-7 range, that I was feeling much better, that I had lost a little weight and that I had removed any sugar from my diet and eating meals that had no simple carbs with some complex carbs.
She seemed very surprised and asked why I had changed to this policy. I just pointed out that, in the absence of any other dietary advice from the NHS, I was going off what I read here, that it would make control easier.
Her take on it was that it screwed up the diagnosis if I was changing my dietary habits, that it was dangerous whilst I was still taking fixed bolus (if no carbs then no Novorapid), and that I would end up replacing my energy source with less healthy dietary fats, and that it may cause ketosis, which would exacerbate complications. She's not suggesting to carb count or modify insulin injections, but to reintroduce more normal ratios of pasta, rice and bread, but smaller portions of everything, especially saturated fats. She's also suggesting to test the post-meal (+2hr) BG levels to ensure that the rise is no more than 3 mmol/l.
Her point was that if it's type 1, reducing carbs makes no difference anyway and if it's type 2, everything will need to be reduced, including sat fats.
To be honest, all this makes sense. So why is there such an emphasis on low-carbohydrate diets on these forums as a way of controlling diabetes?
I feel a bit conflicted now.