A
Good question. I agree with much of what Andy says, without the web my diabetes control and knowledge would be worse and I also tend to switch off from scientific reports and studies. The possible negative side is you can get confused and even misled by information overload and conflicting ideas. My wife loves the internet and every time she gets a blemish or an ache somewhere, she Googles it. Results can differ from indigestion all the way up to cancer ! So, much like diabetes, it's an individual thing. Some can manage to filter out the **** and find an answer whilst others latch onto the first page that pops up.
Yes of course I am into the basic internet searches but not the scientific ones as there is so much conflicting information how do we seperate the reliable from as Mo1905 said the ****Knowledge is Power. What you do with that knowledge and how much of it you believe, is a personal choice. I GOOGLE a lot, it's a huge wealth of information not just for academic papers, which I'm not really in to, but for general info and basic stuff, such as How to? or Where can I buy? Sometimes I wonder how many people ask questions on here instead of Googling for the answers themselves
Geri
Another thing is articles about mice being used to get results. People will decry mouse studies unless, once again, it agrees with their personal beliefs.
im not a great reader of studies, i do tend to have a little look at anything that crops up on the net especially medical stuff though, i reckon knowledge can only be a good thing, as you say opinions do differ a lot so its a case of deciding which to believe, i do always try to look at responses to reports made by real people, a bit like when looking to buy something i tend to give more credence to the reviews than the advert of a product, but without the internet i don't think i would have controlled db anywhere near as well so its all good imo
If I am looking to purchase something then the internet is where I go first. I will read customer reviews, Which reports and the like before making a decision. I will also look for the best price. This saves me traipsing around all the shops that sell this particular product. This also applies to clothes and some stores do customer reviews which helps.
An example with the clothes might be that reviews suggest you need a larger/smaller size than you usually buy.
If your question is about diabetes related articles then you will find that if it suits a person's beliefs then they will take it on board.
Newspapers have a tendency to write headlines about studies that will grab the reader's attention but if they put a reference to the actual study it can be a different article altogether as newspapers rely on spin.
Another thing is articles about mice being used to get results. People will decry mouse studies unless, once again, it agrees with their personal beliefs.
There are some interesting studies that this NHS website dissects to come up with a better rationale.
No it was not just about diabetes
http://www.nhs.uk/news/Pages/NewsIndex.aspx
They explain how half of health news is spun.
http://www.nhs.uk/news/Pages/about-behind-the-headlines.aspx
How to avoid miracle cures and medicine scams
http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/Pharmacy/Pages/Miraclecures.aspx
Miracle foods and the media.
http://www.nhs.uk/news/2011/02February/Pages/miracle-foods-special-report.aspx
I could read a report that says that my particular way of managing my diabetes does not work and will cause health worries. I know that this is not true for me because of my personal beliefs and the anecdotal evidence I can supply. Whether the article would influence someone else I don't know, others may read it and decide it is not for them. Our belief system will always influence how we interpret articles IMHO.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?