what was your second number for a W.H.O. diagnosis,you must have two in a couople of weeks apart
I've been taking 4x500mg of Metformin per day, 2x80mg of Gliclazide, and also Amias (Candesartan) for blood pressure.Certainly possible
You mention other medications apart from Metformin - which ones?
I've been taking 4x500mg of Metformin per day, 2x80mg of Gliclazide, and also Amias (Candesartan) for blood pressure.
To be honest, while I've been careful about what I eat, I haven't been specifically aiming for a low-carb diet, mainly just cutting out sugar and chocolate, eating more fruit and drinking less alcohol.
Actually just after I made the post, the diabetes nurse at the GP practice rang me up to say I could now drop the Gliclazide. In any case, I'd generally only been taking one a day in the mornings, as it's easy to forget before an evening meal and not practical to take if eating out.Well done, that is brilliant. Is your doctor going to reduce your Gliclazide? I would have thought so.
When I was first diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes in March this year, my HbA1c figure was 108.
I've been a good boy and have made modifications to my diet and taken all my medications, particularly Metformin.
Another blood test has just come up with a figure of 36
Is such a dramatic fall in a short period of time credible?
And, not that I'm going to start any backsliding, but what are the implications?
I haven't actually lost more than about 3 or 4 pounds. My current BMI is 26.it would be interesting to know how much wegth you have lost and what is your current BMI to see how this all correlates to the research.
I haven't actually lost more than about 3 or 4 pounds. My current BMI is 26.
I have been consciously eating less and doing more exercise, but for reasons that have been explained to me, but which I don't really understand, it is possible in this situation to alter the calorie input/output ratio without any corresponding weight loss.
I think people who have two HBA1C blood tests a couple of weeks apart are generally those who have a marginal reading. ie very close to being non-diabetic, maybe just a few points in it-just to make sure that it wasn't a lab error or anomaly. That's my understanding anyway. With a number of 108 it would be pretty clear that the person was diabeticso who are the people that have two to diagnosis, because I got one of 50th only and the next three 39 36 34 in one year and not diabetic
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?