- Messages
- 4,789
- Location
- Preston Lancashire
- Type of diabetes
- Type 2
- Treatment type
- Insulin
- Dislikes
- Cruelty to Animals/Children
Liars/Manipulators/Bullying
Please do not attack members or the moderators .No - he was registering his own personal opinion as well as conveying the facts - "So the chances are you would be caught out hopefully.". My point, that both yourself and JaneWatt have now completely obscured, is that it is totally unfair that diabetics should be banned from driving for two night time hypos, which has nothing to do with driving. It will just get worse if this is allowed to continue. Now whenever I go into a Doctor with an illness, my driving license is brought up before we actually get to sorting out my malady !? If you believe that banning diabetics for two night time hypos is fair, as Sid Bonkers seems to, and are willing to support it, with even the moderators portraying the context of my message incorrectly, then I don't really think that this forum is in the best interests of diabetics.
I am not attacking anybody if you look at the context of all my posts, I am simply trying to get the point across that banning someone from the road for two night time hypos in a year makes no sense, as you do not sleep when you drive, and you also have no idea of your blood sugar levels when asleep - the events are completely unrelated, I can see why it's so difficult to get this point across to anybody in authority, considering the responses I've had on this forum. I have made good reasons for not banning someone for two night time hypos - if you think someone should be banned, then maybe you should put forward your reasons. In none of my posts am I disputing what the law is, I am saying that it makes no sense. A law made with no debate or reason is akin to dictatorship.Please do not attack members or the moderators .
Take a look at our forum rules on these matters .
That's fine if they've changed - I wasn't aware that they had.... I can't afford to have night time hypos as I live on my own now, but when I had the occasional hypo when when I didn't, I always knew when I was low when not asleep.Sorry.. I disagree.
From my personal experience only and going back to posts from me in July 2010....
I used to have too many night hypo's. In 25 years I needed (I reckon) about 6 assistances from hubby for bad ones. Just 6, NOT 2 a year. So alarminglingly lower than DVLA regs.
These I believe were an alarm bell warning that I was coming up to sh*t... And sure enough 4 years ago many members will remember my postings regarding a driving incident.
The forms have changed. Night hypo's do not impact on driving with dvla.
I went through sh*t that I hope that others will learn from. However my honest experiences tell me that my night hypo assistances were a factor in what happened to me....
100% honesty... night hypo help or assitance is not good. I think it does impact on day recognition of hypo's.
4 years after having pump I have not had one single night hypo needing help. I have had 1 day one from my own stupidity....and in all honesty my hypo awareness is improved from the times that I had night hypos and the helps...
If you feel this strongly about it all .I am not attacking anybody if you look at the context of all my posts, I am simply trying to get the point across that banning someone from the road for two night time hypos in a year makes no sense, as you do not sleep when you drive, and you also have no idea of your blood sugar levels when asleep - the events are completely unrelated, I can see why it's so difficult to get this point across to anybody in authority, considering the responses I've had on this forum. I have made good reasons for not banning someone for two night time hypos - if you think someone should be banned, then maybe you should put forward your reasons. In none of my posts am I disputing what the law is, I am saying that it makes no sense. A law made with no debate or reason is akin to dictatorship.
Am sure I seen article on DVLA web site about only have to renew if something has changed,which makes sense to me.
And this is, I gather being extended to 10 years, just not sure of the start date.That may be for type 2's not on insulin or hypo inducing drugs... But no..... All hypo liable (from meds) diabetics MUST renew every 3 year currently.
And this is, I gather being extended to 10 years, just not sure of the start date.
Not to sure of the finer details Alan, but from what I understood licences can be issued for up to 10 years and obviously you still have to report any assisted hypos and retinopathy that needs laser treatment (both eyes) I did read somewhere that the new potential 10 year licence will be issued around April next year.And this is, I gather being extended to 10 years, just not sure of the start date.
Weird that!That may be for type 2's not on insulin or hypo inducing drugs... But no..... All hypo liable (from meds) diabetics MUST renew every 3 year currently.
Not to sure of the finer details Alan, but from what I understood licences can be issued for up to 10 years and obviously you still have to report any assisted hypos and retinopathy that needs laser treatment (both eyes) I did read somewhere that the new potential 10 year licence will be issued around April next year.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?