D
Because your body was desperately trying to dump as much sugar as it could whilst it had a chance.
And then you topped up your sugar levels with a banana.
By spreading out your meals you are keeping your demand for insulin production going for a longer time which has lead to the insulin resistance you are currently demonstrating with high blood sugar levels.
If I sound a bit exasperated it's because you are almost self harming doing what you are doing.
Im afraid that all your "trusted sources" have got it wrong.
But hey what do I know. I realise you must try whatever you want.
Yes, do experiment, that is what my endo had me doing. A food diary is such a good idea. To go with your cgm.I can see why you would think that, but my rationale is that I don't actually eat more - I just spread out what I would eat in 2 meals across 4 or 5 smaller meals. I'm thinking this might flatten the glucose curve. Or maybe it won't, I don't know - I'll experiment on myself!
With numbers like these I would relax.Sorry, I had to delete my original reply to your comment as I misunderstood it at first. I get it now. Interesting explanation, and I will definitely consider it as a possibility. I don't believe I'm self harming though as my levels stayed pretty stable throughout the snacking/grazing - I mean, come on, 4.9, 5.2, 5.2 on that day can't be too bad. To me, this just shows that I didn't have a glucose spike and my levels stayed pretty normal. I felt good too, no cravings. Perhaps a CGM would show a different result, I don't know but I plan to find out soon using myself as a Guinea pig!
ps. it was a very small banana and I immediately burnt off the extra glucose with a 3-mile walk home, so please don't make me feel guilty about that. I need to eat something, sheesh! Previous to that, lunch was salad (lettuce, cucumbers, celery and pickled red onions - my own recipe, no sugar!) humous, olive oil, some cheese and - horror of horrors - a small piece of pumpernickel bread!) Hardly carb laden and I'm not aiming for keto, though I probably generate some ketones during fasting when I can manage the 16-hours. I do not need to lose weight. I'm not a vegetarian but I'm not a big meat eater either. I'm just trying to find a healthy balance.
@Susan369
With numbers like these I would relax.
Your lunch looks like mine. Even with a small piece of bread this is only a fraction of 130g of carbs, which Dr Unwin calls low carb https://www.diabetes.co.uk/diet/low-carb-diabetes-diet.html
At the end of the day you have to find out yourself how many grams of carbs you can tolerate.
Regarding your response to my earlier post
@Susan369 said: "When I say I'm "snacking" - what I mean is that I'm distributing the same food intake over several smaller meals as I can't seem to eat too much in one go - also I'm a very slow eater. I don't actually eat more this way and it's mostly healthy, wholefood stuff."
Slow eating is definitely good. Most of us eat way too fast. Restricting the window of eating also has a positive effect, as it gives your body more time where the pancreas does not need to produce insulin. Many people restrict their eating window, e.g. no breakfast and it appears sustainable. Now the same argument applies also to why eating a single lunch is considered to be better than several smaller meals, even if these are wholefood stuff.
PS Regarding bananas, I have given these up as they are fast releasing sugar and have a higher carb content
and replaced these with a small apple.
You are talking from an T3 perspective and not from someone who has T2. You seem to be fixated on studies, which in general there is a lack of and relying on mainstream mantra. It does work, and should be promoted as an alternative, rather than relying on Mr Google with a lot of dodgy information. I like to work on facts. If I followed the mainstream mantra in diabetic care, I would be on insulin, because I would have had uncontrollable diabetes. I stripped my carbs right back going into keto, I have slipped a bit and carbs have creeped back in, but my A1c is 44 much lower than I thought it would be. I know having carbs is dangerous for us to keep our BM under control and weight.Well, you're right. Most diet studies are inherently flawed because it would be unethical to do double blind studies. So just about all of them are observational studies. That's why I said that if the keto diet worked for some people then that's great. I don't think we should be promoting it though
I thought myself, when I wanted to find a disagree response button and there was not an appropriate symbolI really really wish there was a sad or disagree response button. It seems rude to laugh at comments you consider inaccurate or plain daft but there isn’t any other to use. Perhaps calling it creative is the best there is.
I wonder if my Gp practice have changed their stance on low carb and keto, I should askSpeaking as a T2, I’m finding keto diet now pretty mainstream and there is lots of well respected studies and medical people recommending it for diabetes and other things (my hubby is on low carb no red meat for IBS and colitis and it works well for him, recommended by his gastroenterologist) My GP surgery advocate it and encourage it for control and weight loss (if weight loss is needed) for T2, my nurse at the surgery said that they have a number of patients that do keto and quite a lot do low carb and they have the best results.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?