Deediabetic
Active Member
- Messages
- 42
I was diagnosed end of June. I wouldn't worry so much it's just that we are trying to start a family and when I visited the specialist diabetic pregnancy unit at my local hospital to get the go ahead to try conceive, they gave me table with BGL targets to keep to during pregnancy. I've managed to keep all within those targets 99% of the time except for my fasting BGLs. I've been trying hard to keep the fasting BGLs down and it's really frustrating because nothing seems to work. I think I'll just have to live with it because it seems no matter what I do, my body just won't play ball. :/When were you diagnosed? If fairly recently, you’ll likely find that FBG levels come down in due course - it’s often the last number to come down and what you describe isn’t uncommon.
I’ve been using a Libre for some time and consistently the period of the day where my BG is highest is between 6am and 12 noon. The lowest is between midnight and 6am. This applies no matter what range I’m in overall, whether I’m eating once or twice a day and doesn’t vary according to the amount of exercise. Yes, individual readings pre and post prandial or pre and post exercise may vary, but these overall trends are consistent.
If your levels are generally where you want them to be, I wouldn’t fret about FBG. It’s affected by so many things - sleep, stress and so on too.
Edited for typo
Hey there @MbakerI have a multi-faceted approach to diabetes management, biased towards exercise and those Doctors (Dr Ted Naiman, Dr Shawn Baker Dr Jamie Seaman, Dr Garbriel Lyon) and Keto leaning sportsmen and women, who have had blood sugar issues themselves, and or who actively treat clients.....and get results.
Two things to try are to move your last meal of the day to an earlier time (mine is somewhere between 15:00 and 16:00 most days). Maybe I will get a few hisses for this, but also reducing fat (Dr Naiman is the authority on this method, where he says there could be a delay in the glucose rise due to fat suppression, i.e. dietary fat being is excess of what is being used). I would say the less fat option is potentially applicable if a person has what could be considered excess body fat that can be used in place of dietary fat - the fat would be replaced with lean protein.
Thanks. "Associated" means nothing as far as I am concerned, RCT's are a little better. There have been plenty of protein overfeeding studies and the results are increased fat loss, no results report increased risk of diabetes.The short and long term consequences of upping protein intake on IR and BG levels are hard to disentangle from other factors. But most studies do show that, long term, for most people upping protein intake without increasing your total calorie intake, has a lot of benefits both for IR and weight loss.
@Mbaker as a fellow martial arts and exercise enthusiast with T2, you might enjoy reading this:
"High dietary protein intake, reducing or eliciting insulin resistance?"
https://www.nature.com/articles/ejcn2014123#:~:text=sensitivity improving strategy.-,Dietary proteins have an insulinotropic effect and thus promote insulin,glucose clearance from the blood.&text=3-,In the long term, however, a high dietary protein intake,risk of type 2 diabetes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?