deadwood2 said:The case has to be big enough for the contents :wink:
Actually, I have been really impressed with it - to be honest the NHS issue one was smaller and had smaller strips, but was too fiddly to use, and as for the pricker - pygmies could use it to slay mammoths.
Gets my vote. Shame the free batteries and control solution doesn't extend to strips and sharps.
deadwood2 said:Agree about the wastage, but I'm sure that (time aside) this is a technique issue. It only requires a minute spec of blood, but this has to be delivered to the front or upper face of the strip, otherwise you could go through an armful before it is satisfied.
CiaraJansonFan said:deadwood2 said:Agree about the wastage, but I'm sure that (time aside) this is a technique issue. It only requires a minute spec of blood, but this has to be delivered to the front or upper face of the strip, otherwise you could go through an armful before it is satisfied.
You're actually supposed to apply the blood to the END of the strip as per the picture in the box, not to the top of the strip!
deadwood2 said:CiaraJansonFan said:deadwood2 said:Agree about the wastage, but I'm sure that (time aside) this is a technique issue. It only requires a minute spec of blood, but this has to be delivered to the front or upper face of the strip, otherwise you could go through an armful before it is satisfied.
You're actually supposed to apply the blood to the END of the strip as per the picture in the box, not to the top of the strip!
Granted, but if which bit of the end? If you lie the nano on it's back and put a strip in, the receptive material is to the top/ front. If you introduce blood from below, it won't be absorbed to the same extent. Wrong technique = wastage.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?