it sounds like they changed adhesive from the 1st batch, which didn't have this problem
Had an interesting observation with the Libre tonight. Feeling a little "ropey", I scanned and showed an IFG reading of 5.8 with a mildly upward trend arrow. The blood test showed 4.9. I felt like I was heading towards hypo, but didn't treat immediately as neither of the readings demanded this. Roll forward 35 mins and I am definitely below 4, both feeling it and testing it.
I guess this is just a reminder that the trend indicator and scanned data is not always where you really are now. More importantly it goes to show that the gap between IFG and bg readings probably also needs to be interpreted, and when I have a stable sensor, it means that my bs is moving in one or the other direction fairly quickly.
Just goes to show that, even with all the tech, it's not infallible though. The feelings were right!
Anyone tried blocking the application's outbound connection at their firewall? I'm wondering if the application would still work. I can't see any need for the application to have outbound access. It needs inbound to update, but should not need outbound without permission.
I'm not sure if it actually breaks UK DP laws. Our laws are a little lax around the definition of 'personal' data - unless it's user-identifiable, the Information Officer doesn't even have to be informed of breaches and neither do the individuals whose data it is. If medical data on one system is left inappropriately accessible but someone would need access to another system to actually identify the users and the likelihood is that they wouldn't have access to both systems, it is not deemed a breach and is not reportable to the Information Commissioner.
Unless it's necessary to tell the Information Commissioner of a breach it's up to the company involved whether they inform users. A breach is only defined as a known unauthorised access of the data - if the data has been available to unauthorised access but there is no evidence of access, it is not deemed breached and nobody needs to be informed.
All I'm really saying here is that people in the UK often think they have more rights and that there are more safeguards than there actually are. What Abbott are doing is very bad, very underhand, and certainly very poor practise, but I doubt that it breaks UK law because to identify individuals from the data, I expect you would need access to multiple systems, e.g. sales and R&D, which Abbotts would probably claim their staff do not have.
Smidge
Hm not so encouraging to see that even the most positive users so far are reporting quite serious skin problems.
I put my 3rd sensor on yesterday, after a break of 4 days. Took another unused spot on my arm, which hurted a bit during insertion since there is no fat. So far no skin irritation I guess..lets see how this goes..
Have to say I used way too many teststrips in the days without sensor.
Readings and trends seem to be right on this sensor though! Second one was also ok, mine being send from France..
Why is it a concern if Abbott are downloading reports? its not as if they are downloading anything else thats private. Its probably just to better the product.
Sorry...dont mean to sound rude. I just dont understand. its just a bg report
Not everyone is having skin problems. I just went onto sensor 8 and not even a red mark! I alternate arms every 2 weeks. im quite muscly too and havent had any issues.
only issues ive had have been with ordering and delivery!
Why is it a concern if Abbott are downloading reports? its not as if they are downloading anything else thats private. Its probably just to better the product.
Sorry...dont mean to sound rude. I just dont understand. its just a bg report
Hey guys. Can anyone remember that date we put on our first sensor?
This may be stored in the US ( Abbott has a safe-harbour certificate) They also refer to local privacy policies which are peculiar to each country.In addition, from time to time when you use a System, we may collect anonymous or aggregated
information for the purposes of quality and product improvement and research. We only collect
information which is de-identified; it cannot be used to identify you or your IP address.