Yes, many many many many of us use the Libre. Try searching for "Libre" in the field at the top of every page and you will see all the threads.
The value of Libre should not be thought of as replacing finger pricks. It's like thinking a smart phone is nothing more than a device that receives phone calls. The value of Libre is seeing what is happening to your blood sugars between finger pricks that will tell you things like whether you pre-bolus far enough ahead of eating or predict a hypo before it happens.
There are limitations and if you expect it to replace all finger pricks you will be disappointed. From what I remember (although I encourage you to read some of the other threads),
- some of us find our body takes a day or two to familiarise with the alien object in our arm which can affect the readings the sensor gives. This is why I apply my sensor a couple of days before activating it.
- sensors are calibrated to be most accurate between 4 and 9 mmol/l. Therefore, it is advised to confirm with a finger prick reading before correcting a high or low.
- CGMs use interstitial fluid readings to calculate blood glucose. This is 10 to 15 minutes behind finger prick readings. Libre attempts to accommodate this delay by predicting the current reading by extrapolating the current trend. Most of the time, this is great unless the trend has changed in the last 15 minutes such as when treating a hypo. Therefore, it is always recommended to check hypo recovery with a finger prick.
- Libre are factory calibrated. This seems to work well for the majority of people but some of us find we are not like Factory Man so the sensor can be fair out. However, there are unofficial phone apps such as Diabox and xDrip which allow you to calibrate the readings. These are techy apps written by techies so not advisable if you are a technphobe. But, if you fancy giving them a go, they have the added advantage of become CGMs - you only have to scan your sensor to start it.
- some sensor are dodgy. Abbott is pretty good at replacing these if you contact them ... as I believe I should because NHS is cash strapped enough already without funding tech that is broken.