Patch said:Steve - I've been looking at the cumulative effect of carbs on BG lately. I've found that the body can deal with 1 off "binges" much better than it can deal with a slightly elevated carb intake over time.
Everything in moderation in reverse, I suppose! <<ducks>>>
clearviews said:My version of a Big Breakfast is
2 rashers of bacon (never lean)
1 scrambled egg
Half a tomato
1 slice homemade VLC bread (1-2 grams carbs)fried in the dripping
couple of slices of zuchinni
several mushrooms
Cholesterol continues to improve without medication and is in an extremely happy place.
No longer make marmalade or jams and don't even have them in the pantry any longer.
sugarless sue said:Patch, do you have a source for this idea of yours ?Patch said:Steve - I've been looking at the cumulative effect of carbs on BG lately. I've found that the body can deal with 1 off "binges" much better than it can deal with a slightly elevated carb intake over time.
Everything in moderation in reverse, I suppose! <<ducks>>>
AFAIK the digestive system deals with each meal as it comes. The components are then used to fuel the body and any excess is stored as fat or excreted from the body. Only in this way could you say that carbs are stored !
However, if you eat a meal with a lot of fat then that meal takes far longer than usual to digest. So, in theory, a heavy fat meal eaten at 13.00 could still be being digested at 17.00 when you may eat again so in that way the carbs that you ate at 13.00 would have a knock on effect on your Bg levels at 17.00.
Ken said:I edited your post for uneccesary comment aimed at Sue. You have a problem with that discuss it with me........
Sue said:As for the comments. I took that as banter...didn't you ? :roll:
Sue said:P.S have you factored in all the protein you eat as well. 60% of that turns to glucose don't forget.
viv1969 said:Out of curiosity....I was under the impression that if a post was edited by "the powers that be", then that post was then marked as edited, otherwise all manner of sneaky editing could, in theory, be happening. :?
Patch said:My theory
A spike never fully recovers back to normal pre-carb levels, and the next low (ish) intake of carbs causes another spike, with the original spike only half recovered. Now, these spikes may not even push my BG up by more than 1mmol, but if it only recovers by 0.5mmol before the next small spike, the Cumulative Effect starts to take hold.
The Cumulative Carb Effect. (Copyright: Patch 2011).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?