http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-41256454I've just read a BBC news report this morning,headed"GPs unaware diabetes can be beaten".This is a report published in the BMJ of the study led by Professor Mike Lean from Glasgow University's Human Nutrition Section.The BMJ report is quoted as stating"patients and doctors may be unaware that type 2 diabetes can be reversed,despite recent publicity.It is in everyone's interest to reclassify people with type 2 diabetes when they become non. diabetic.Official guidelines and international consensus for recording diabetes in remission are needed"Has anyone else read/watched this ?Im not tech savvy enough to transfer the whole article here.
My understanding is this is part of Professor Taylor's longer term study, following his initial work, based on the Newcastle Diet.
The longer term study is funded by the charity Diabetes UK.
As I understand it, Professor Taylor is due to present initial findings later in the year, the the published work will be early next year.
I think we should take the positive note that this is published in the BMJ, which effectively tells Doctors to take possible reversal seriously, as well as taking into account that by using the term remission they will not loose money. These 2 areas are massive and significant.
Ok so they have thrown their hat behind the Newcastle Diet, which we know can work (I have assumed this is the protocol as Professor Taylor is in the credits). There is no reason why the weight loss can't be lchf as eell as low calorie, should one wish. In context for me I feel this is a moment of significance.
I really wish in just one of his interviews or press statements he would say those words. Even in the latest press statement yesterday it still talked about the current protocol.Mbaker, having corresponded with Professor Taylor directly, he doesn't care how people lose their weight, but for his (and any other) study, the conditions need to be strictly controlled, so if the study subjects are using manufactured shakes they will be consuming a defined amount of nutrition in those, then the veg part; 200 cal of veg is quite a lot of veg.
By and large, on that protocol, it'd be easier to ensure compliance than to suggest that someone consume x carbs or y calories a day.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?