I mean it in the context of them saying the person might become obsessive about it, and be anxious, stressed out etc. Some doctors actually believe that the more information a person has about their body and their health, the more likely they are to be anxious, so they think ignorance is bliss, and it's their job to know all the stuff, and patients should just be passive recipients of their wisdom. They are paternalistic, think doctor knows best, and they are not up to speed with the contemporary culture of personal empowerment.First I've heard about anyone in the field suggesting testing is harmful.
Oh I agree with you. I'm saying that is what these doctors think. And clearly, they are wrong.That is one giant leap and a generalization I think is going way too far. The overwhelming number of people here WANT to test, WANT discounted strips and WANT to keep track of where they're going. You might get the occasional needle phobia person but education here re lancets / settings / fingers reassures them it's quick and painless.
There is NOTHING wrong with being obsessive about testing and in reality any stress and anxiety is related to the figure they might see rather than the simple action that provides them the result. The ignorance is potentially a far greater cost
This is not about whether the NHS should, or can afford to, provide test strips on a permanent or temporary basis to non-T1 diabetics. Having read #EveryCloud ’s post, and so many more like it over the years on this forum, I wonder whether we could gather together examples of Healthcare Professionals who have told people that it is either unnecessary or just plain wrong to test their blood sugars. It is a scandal that needs highlighting.
Yep, just diagnosed with Type 2 last week. Met 'diabetes nurse specialist' to hear all about how to proceed.
I'll summarise:-
Step 0: Diabetes 101 talk.
Step 1: Go away for 4 weeks, read these leaflets on what diabetes is and how diet and exercise may help (essentially repeats and expands ever so slightly on what was told in Step 0).
(FYI - My diet is fairly good anyway, I avoid processed food, don't have a lot of salt, avoid ready meals, rarely have take away's, don't have much of added sugar etc. etc.. and I struggle to be more active than I am most of the time because I have a form of arthritis i.e. I already do what I can whilst keeping in mind 'pacing' myself so I don't aggravate joints and various connective tissues and end up suffering serious fatigue which is utterly the last thing you want 'cos then you can't do anything for days on end!!!)
Step 2: at 4 wks Come back for, err, actually I forget the point of the next appointment - lol
Step 3: 6 wks after initial diagnosis submit blood sample for HbA1c test to find out if your getting better yet.
So, essentially some guess work, crossing fingers and hoping it'll go away - ***.
What _I_ want to be doing is testing blood glucose before meals, 2hrs after, 4hrs after, etc. to see which foods are pushing my BG up and which aren't. You know, actual facts and stuff that I can then make informed decisions on the basis of, to make the changes that'll really bring down my BG.
I have cut down on sugar by not having the one spoon of it in tea/coffee that I used to have. I have switched relatively fast carb cereals (i.e. cornflakes) for porridge or a cooked breakfast (low fat of course). The main effect thus far is I am more often weak and wobbly feeling which gets better after I next eat. Seems like a good indication of lowered BG, but I'd rather have a measure!
I thought, sod it, I'll get myself a BG meter and get on with it. Chemists attached to my GP's didn't want to sell me one because I answered honestly when asked why I wanted one. I said I've just been diagnosed T2, they said, you'll be given one if and when your Dr/Nurse wants you to have one!
I'll buy one online shortly I think ...
/edit/
I didn't mention the bit that directly relates to the question!
DNS said testing would be unnecessary unless on insulin and counterproductive because I'd get all confused with the numbers and stuff. Condescending much...
/edit/
We in UK get plenty of offers of free meters. I have had several recently and accepted 2. Unfortunately the test strips and lancets are not provided free , beyond the initial 10 that come with the meter. The strips can cost up to £30 for 50. No wonder the different companies are giving away meters. Once they have us they make a lot of money from us.That's exactly what I meant when I said they tell us testing is unnecessary and would do us "harm", because we would get all confused and such. They treat us like children when they do this. Also, when the pharmacists interrogate us about why we want a meter and then remind us that our parents, sorry, doctors and nurses, will decide if we should have one.
I think the best approach is to lie to the pharmacist and say something like, I've got T1 and I want a spare meter for convenience. (While going to a pharmacy we don't normally go to). Or order one online. Luckily for me, T2s are freely offered a meter in NZ, so I didn't have that problem.
Oh apparently it is, as you can turn into a compulsive obsessive tester, or you can get upset and depressed by high test results. So physically harmful - no, but mentally - maybe.First I've heard about anyone in the field suggesting testing is harmful.
Add to that the comment 'all you will achieve is sore fingers'! Nurse speak!Oh apparently it is, as you can turn into a compulsive obsessive tester, or you can get upset and depressed by high test results. So physically harmful - no, but mentally - maybe.
Robbity
PS To clarify - this is a fairly standard excuse in the UK for not dishing test equipment.
Yes - I forgot that one!Add to that the comment 'all you will achieve is sore fingers'! Nurse speak!
I think we'd all rather have sore fingers than diabetic complications.Add to that the comment 'all you will achieve is sore fingers'! Nurse speak!
Try telling that to nurse using the NHS protocol script..I think we'd all rather have sore fingers than diabetic complications.
Aw, Robbity. Just shows how different we all take these things. I was conceited enough to believe I no longer needed to test because I had been an A star patient who because of her virtuous ways had cured herself, thus saving the NHS lots of money on test strips eye screening, blood tests, and treatment for future complications that I now had no chance of getting.Yes - I forgot that one!
I actually got a bit depressed after the diabetes doctor at our practice had told me I shouldn't be testing - it didn't happen immediately after my appointment and I absolutely knew I was doing what needs to be donefor me to keep things under control and I certainly wasn't going to stop on his say-so, but his comment hit below the belt and ended up making a quite a serious and long term dent in my confidence, which had a knock-on effect on my glucose levels for a while.
Robbity
And I wonder then what do they tell type 1 diabetics who probably do need to test - do these nurses perhaps believe that their fingers are somehow immune to pain? If it wasn't so sad it might actually be funny...I think we'd all rather have sore fingers than diabetic complications.
I'm not sure that I'll ever actually cure myself, though my GP when giving me my diagnosis told me that if I lost enough weight, my pancreas might be able to manage properly again. The best I feel that I can do is control my glucose levels, and since I've no intention returning to a carb heavy diet, I'll never find out if I could go back to my previous way of eating. I find testing though actually gives me a certain power over my condition, and believe that's probably an additional reason to continue testing.
It's a bit like my migraines - I've suffered from them for most of my life, and have been able (for the most part) to manage them with medication and by avoiding certain foods, but I've come to the conclusion that I'll never be rid of them completely - my doctor has said they can be genetic, and they do actualy run in our family.
Robbity