Sorry it meant to signify fat and/or lazy not that fat people are lazy. I had a dance teacher once who appeared very overweight but was so light on his feet and certainly not lazy so the two don't go together in my mind. I'l see if I can edit it.Great message, I'd like to suggest that fat/lazy makes it look like fat people are lazy and nothing could be further from the truth. It might be a personal thing and an idiot endocrinologist's comments to me some years ago. I worry about terminology too much and freely admit that I want things to be accurate.
Sorry it meant to signify fat and/or lazy not that fat people are lazy. I had a dance teacher once who appeared very overweight but was so light on his feet and certainly not lazy so the two don't go together in my mind. I'l see if I can edit it.
Also as Brunerria points out - having insulin resistance and/or diabetes can make you feel very lethargic so to outsiders you appear lazy. The energy definitely comes back once you change diet to low carb. I would never have dreamed of running a 10k nor been able to before I went LCHF. No more after lunch naps, no more tired all the time.
If people are interested in helping change ideas the Tim Noakes foundation is asking diabetics to fill in a questionnaire to help them further research in to benefits of LCHF. I'll try and find the link.
Not to mention that most of these healthy foods are starch and carbohydrate overloaded. Lactose free foods and gluten free foods are still high on carbs.Aeconding catherinecherub's comment - we are not all lazy couch - we do not all make ourselves ill! Secondly - the big 'sugar' issue - still too much sugar in many foods and too many foods 'advertised and presented as healthy' are still full of sugar - that cannot be healthy!
The only problem I foresee is that for the effective use of a meter the patient must be instructed and then motivated.I think in addition to what most people have already said I would mention the fact that if T2 where given a bg monitoring meter most diabetics would avoid taking any medication as they would be able to work out for themselves what and does not affect their bg. Therefore avoiding that food and learning more about how their decision on certain food groups affects them. People who don't know about this site are wandering blindly through life miss managing their diabetes and getting complications due to just not knowing! If doctors gave them a bg meter I think the nhs would save thousands of pounds. Knowledge is key!
I also think there is an important role for sugar substitutes.
I would be cautious about advocating sugar substitutes...some factors observed to cause hyperinsulinemia...
“Hyperinsulinemia: Cause or Consequence?”
http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/content/61/1/4
"Several additional nonlipid stimuli were also identified in our screening, including artificial sweeteners and iron.Artificial sweeteners that are also frequently present in modern foods were found to impact insulin secretion.Shown here is insulin secretion at basal and two stimulatory concentrations of glucose in response to saccharin,aspartame, and sucralose. All stimulated basal secretion acutely, but saccharin was most potent and also inhibited glucose-stimulated secretion. Interestingly,only saccharin stimulated basal secretion at concentrations that might be achieved by high levels of consumption,for example,in diet beverages."
I Do think when people hear low carb fat diet they visualise something they conceptualisee as 'unhealthy ' . In practise practically any plate based on a bed of greens, with a normal say (100 g) of protein looks just like a normal dieters plate. If you add to that plate a dressing of balsamic oil and mayonnaise, some avocado and some nuts or seeds you transform it to an Lchf meal that can easily be 60-70 percent fat, full if nutrients and very low carb.30 minutes is an astonishing amount of time in the context you have found yourself in. I believe prevention and management is important. In the prevention camp I would encourage Doctors to perform FBG tests where possible for patients who attend clinic on other matters and for those in at risk groups. In terms of management they could provide a powerful collective voice for Type 1 CGM's. Doctors can help change the "normal". So called normal mainstream food tends to processed carb laden rubbish (which unfortunately tastes nice due to familiarity eating over a lifetime), why should this even be considered normal. Doctors deal with first line consequences of carb addiction. I would politely challenge them compare the general outcomes of LCHF against the Eatwell plate outcomes. I think if you were able to project on screen the powerful self explanatory pictures on Diet Doctor such as meat, fish, broccoli, berries etc and ask if any of these are objectionable, maybe contrasting these with prevalent fast food or even what is considered a balanced plate. I see it as vitally important to ensure that LCHF is not seen as dangerous, a fad, unbalanced and a health risk, to do this facts will need to demonstrated, these might be available from those @Brunneria referenced. I would provide a cheat sheet with thought provoking references to Diet Doctor, successes stories on this site, Dr. Jason Fung, Dr. Sarah Hallberg, asking the Doctors to review the material. Last I would implore Doctors to offer LCHF and exercise as a first step (with support).
You state you are managing on diet and exercise. What diet and how much extra exercise?
I would imagine that your own experience would be a good place to start. Did you try the usual advice and fail and then find something better? Need to know more about your own journey.
Obviously I would push an ultra low carb diet with fasting because that's what i do. Exercise.. not so much.
You could take a look at the success stories section here and report back from there.
I think you need to be a little more specific about the track you intend to take before we can assist.
Hope that helps.
Mark
yup fair point
my view is that 90% of T2 diabetes starts and ends with food.
in most cases people get T2 because they make "poor lifestyle choices", I know I did
but why, (I am (was) an ad man by trade)
The answer lies in a combination of lack of good choices, poor knowledge, poor direction and the wrong desires.
what we tend to see in response is a focus solely on knowledge, but realistically most people have a reasonable general sense that junk+sweet+sofa=bad whereas veg+fruit+exercise = good. Knowledge is helpful in the hands of the willing - the low carb mantra at the heart of this site are an excellent example. But with no will there is no way.
But there are 4m diabetics in the UK, a reasonable small number are active here. The reality is that 60% of diabetics are failing to managed their glucose, fat and pressure levels. The system is failing them - a skinny healthy looking nutritionists grinning away suggesting we swap chips for lentils rarely works. Any plan that requires will power will ultimately fail, which is why 99% of diet fail (fact). The only thing that works is a change in desire.
We need:
- at home we need recipes that are easy, delicious, affordable and don't spike our glucose - we need to encourage the chefs, grocers and food makers to give us these choices. As diabetics we mostly see recipes and products that are either soulless or often irresponsible high in sugar but labelled as low/no sugar.
- in restaurants we need delicious choices on the menu that are clearly flagged as being low sugar, ideally with a recognized and trusted kitemark
- and we need snacks that are tasty, delicious, occasionally naughty but always low in sugar - so we can be human, stress eat, comfort eat, have treats and rewards but do so safely.
Above all we need to use the power of advertising in its many forms from TV through to packaging to make no sugary choices exciting and attractive.
I could go on, but that is the heart of it.
What do you guys think?
Another thought for you.Thanks all for your feedback. I won't reply to all as i'm sure you don't want 10 posts from me.
We need to shoot for where we can win.
I very much like @kokhongw picture, high road low road.
We all know low carb is the most important message, but there is also a real concern about fiber and the complexity of explaining glycemic load, but we MUST find a way to navigate this so we get people off high glucose/low fiber carbs.
I also think there is an important role for sugar substitutes.
Realistically we could not, and should not, move the focus from obesity and lifestyle. 90% of newly diagnosed diabetics are overweigh (fact) and the link between high glucose diet, sedentary lifestyle and T2 is absolutely clear. There are a few exceptions, but they are rare.
If we want to be listened to as a patient group, as a consumer group and a social group, if we want to get a better world for ourselves we need to be open, honest and realistic - denying these links would be futile, and would lose us any credibility. Diabetics currently have little voice in this debate at public health level (I bet I;ll be the on T2 in the room), if we want to change that we need to face the hard truths.
What we need to do is change the language and tone to be less "blame and shame" to encourage better quality education, particularly on carbs, and for the system to provide more emotional support.
totally agree.
I very much like you mountain and molehills and your blog site
this is exactly right, though i would add sugar substitutes to the molehill path
my view is anything that requires ongoing will power will ultimately fail
Currently people are not even given the chance to see before the prescription comes out.
If you say high fat one visualizes a cornucopia of lards and sausages, not absolutely some olive oil and goat cheese. The problem is that the advertising as good food some cereal based wholegrain or not things tends to skew what one sees as good food.I Do think when people hear low carb fat diet they visualise something they conceptualisee as 'unhealthy ' .
Cutting the carbs totally as in ketogenic diet is a thing. Cutting to 35-45% is reasonable and easy if the diet is tailored on what one eats. I think the problem with willpower and discipline is on control the food intake in general before looking at the food plate composition.I have a feeling that most GPs find that telling a patient to cut their carbs is a recipe for disaster because the vast majority of people don't have the will power or the discipline to make such a change to their diets.
I have a feeling that most GPs find that telling a patient to cut their carbs is a recipe for disaster because the vast majority of people don't have the will power or the discipline to make such a change to their diets.
I know several people, 3 of whom are relatives (including my father), who find it impossible to cut their carbs. Two in particular are insulin dependent and having poor BG control.
But most GP's mine included haven't a clue that cutting carbs will be of huge benefit.I have a feeling that most GPs find that telling a patient to cut their carbs is a recipe for disaster because the vast majority of people don't have the will power or the discipline to make such a change to their diets.
I know several people, 3 of whom are relatives (including my father), who find it impossible to cut their carbs. Two in particular are insulin dependent and having poor BG control.
Another thought for you.
For very many of us, our blood sugars went down within a two weeks of starting to low carb. lt is that aspect of the journey that makes it so exciting because it is something that one can see is starting to work almost immediately so you know that even though there is a long haul ahead you can see how you can make it happen.
Currently people are not even given tje chance to see before the prescription comes out.
Maybe some kind of plea that doctors consider the idea of giving their patients a diet sheet that simply says no potatoes, flour. Wheat packaged foods, rise pasta and sugar and a meter for one month as the very first stage so that all the patients who have enough self control to see for themsrlveshow they can control it together with a link yo this website. , in the end diabetics will end up with a lifetime of medical intervention so at least trying to give control to all those capable of taking control and thus reducing the pressure on the health service.
It's hard to see how a simple instruction to cut out sugars and fattening foods like your grandma would have told you to, for a short period and see what happens can rw as let bring tje entire medical profession into disrepute.
That could be backed up with things like the recent study that just three consecutive low carb meals makes a difference which was also reported on this website.
The tr agedy of it all is that for very many people the whole thing can be nothing like as traumatic as it currently is.
@LivingLoud. Sounds as if you have some great thoughts. i would like to add one (perhaps an aside): can you distinguish between the different types of diabetes. I have been amazed by how many HCP don't know.yup fair point
my view is that 90% of T2 diabetes starts and ends with food.
in most cases people get T2 because they make "poor lifestyle choices", I know I did
but why, (I am (was) an ad man by trade)
The answer lies in a combination of lack of good choices, poor knowledge, poor direction and the wrong desires.
what we tend to see in response is a focus solely on knowledge, but realistically most people have a reasonable general sense that junk+sweet+sofa=bad whereas veg+fruit+exercise = good. Knowledge is helpful in the hands of the willing - the low carb mantra at the heart of this site are an excellent example. But with no will there is no way.
But there are 4m diabetics in the UK, a reasonable small number are active here. The reality is that 60% of diabetics are failing to managed their glucose, fat and pressure levels. The system is failing them - a skinny healthy looking nutritionists grinning away suggesting we swap chips for lentils rarely works. Any plan that requires will power will ultimately fail, which is why 99% of diet fail (fact). The only thing that works is a change in desire.
We need:
- at home we need recipes that are easy, delicious, affordable and don't spike our glucose - we need to encourage the chefs, grocers and food makers to give us these choices. As diabetics we mostly see recipes and products that are either soulless or often irresponsible high in sugar but labelled as low/no sugar.
- in restaurants we need delicious choices on the menu that are clearly flagged as being low sugar, ideally with a recognized and trusted kitemark
- and we need snacks that are tasty, delicious, occasionally naughty but always low in sugar - so we can be human, stress eat, comfort eat, have treats and rewards but do so safely.
Above all we need to use the power of advertising in its many forms from TV through to packaging to make no sugary choices exciting and attractive.
I could go on, but that is the heart of it.
What do you guys think?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?