Helss
Active Member
Hi there,
Back in February I had a 24 hour Blood Pressure monitoring and the usual blood tests. Turns out I don't have high BP, but had a fasting glucose of 7.1 and GP said I was probably Type 2. Took me a fortnight to get a GP appointment after the tests, where she told me she was going to test again and not to do any drastic diets until the results were in. I did nothing until after that second test, then decided to go lower carb to see what happened and started testing my blood sugar. A fortnight later and I finally had an appointment for result, where I was rather surprised that she was furious with me for doing anything until I had the results. I genuinely didn't know I'd done anything wrong - just felt empowered. I had 7.1 fasting and 43 HBA1C at that point. (Didn't even know which tests she was running that time). She wants me to do the glucose drink test, which with Easter and hospital opening hours for the blood clinic will mean another four weeks until I hear for certain if I'm diabetic.
I'm trying to be positive and not get overwhelmed by all the different information plus feeling pretty unsupported by my GP. But I'm struggling with getting my head round this and denying myself food I love. I'm slightly overweight (5'6" weigh 11stone 9) so although we have a family history, I wasn't expecting it at age 46. And I'm furious with my GP to the extent that I'm thinking of changing surgeries. She said if I am, I must have metformin, if I'm not then I don't. I would only get a referral to the diabetic services if I am Type 2, not pre-diabetic.
What I suppose I most want to know is that if I technically am Type 2 but have already brought my bloods down to Pre-diabetic levels, would that matter for the short term in terms of taking this third test?
Back in February I had a 24 hour Blood Pressure monitoring and the usual blood tests. Turns out I don't have high BP, but had a fasting glucose of 7.1 and GP said I was probably Type 2. Took me a fortnight to get a GP appointment after the tests, where she told me she was going to test again and not to do any drastic diets until the results were in. I did nothing until after that second test, then decided to go lower carb to see what happened and started testing my blood sugar. A fortnight later and I finally had an appointment for result, where I was rather surprised that she was furious with me for doing anything until I had the results. I genuinely didn't know I'd done anything wrong - just felt empowered. I had 7.1 fasting and 43 HBA1C at that point. (Didn't even know which tests she was running that time). She wants me to do the glucose drink test, which with Easter and hospital opening hours for the blood clinic will mean another four weeks until I hear for certain if I'm diabetic.
I'm trying to be positive and not get overwhelmed by all the different information plus feeling pretty unsupported by my GP. But I'm struggling with getting my head round this and denying myself food I love. I'm slightly overweight (5'6" weigh 11stone 9) so although we have a family history, I wasn't expecting it at age 46. And I'm furious with my GP to the extent that I'm thinking of changing surgeries. She said if I am, I must have metformin, if I'm not then I don't. I would only get a referral to the diabetic services if I am Type 2, not pre-diabetic.
What I suppose I most want to know is that if I technically am Type 2 but have already brought my bloods down to Pre-diabetic levels, would that matter for the short term in terms of taking this third test?