CherryAA
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,171
- Type of diabetes
- Type 2
- Treatment type
- Diet only
Well your HDL was even lower then so you are making progress ! I don't know the time difference between the two, but correcting too low HDL takes time .Thanks for reply @CherryAA. When I was on Simvastatin I was still shown as high risk. Here us the results based on those figures. So still confused
My own readings were as follows I adopted LCHF on diagnosis
August HDL 1.04 LDL 3.36 Trig 2.7 Total 5.6
Oct HDL 1.04 LDL2.56 Trig 2.05 Total 4.6
Dec HDL 1.16 LDL 2.54 LDL Trig 1.49 Total 4.3 deliberately increased saturated fats
March HDL 1.38 LDL 2.22 Trig 0.76 total 3.9 - I was getting a little worried here as I would like my total cholesterol to go up
August HDL 1. 60 LDL 2.4 Trig 0.82 total 4.3 - so pleased with this increase
Overall I am hopeful that if I keep up the diet, both HDL and LDL and total cholesterol will increase whilst keeping triglycerides low under 1.0 .
The research suggest having a high cholesterol is protective of health after 60. Some of the fittest people on the planet appear to be hyper responders - so basically if I gradually join that club by increasing both HDL and LDL in proportion from here on in whilst keeping my trigs low - then as far as I am concerned the higher the total cholesterol the better and I will be a happy bunny.