donnellysdogs
Master
- Messages
- 13,233
- Location
- Northampton
- Type of diabetes
- Type 1
- Treatment type
- Pump
- Dislikes
- People that can't listen to other people's opinions.
People that can't say sorry.
I think you are missing my point.
It is not up to me to trawl through a vague, blog sourced document listing a range of studies and myriad different sub-subjects. Why on earth would I slog through several studies looking for one thing you may have mis remembered, or misquoted? If you have misremembered or misquoted, then I may not even recognise it if I see it.
You brought up the issues, without adequate references, and now you aren't willing to actually specify which is the source of your 'information'? Plus, apparently your opinion is based on other, currently inaccessible studies, which you are unable to name.
As I mentioned in our previous discussion, I am open to any way of eating having pitfalls, but hearsay on the internet is either anecdote, scaremongering, wishful thinking or gossip. That is why accurate references are so valuable.
I'm also totally open to you having an opinion on this. I even agree with you that keto eating has not been studied for long enough periods to 'prove' its safety. But you will notice that I am not throwing out vague references to imply that my opinion is anything more than personal speculation.
There are plenty of adequate references in the article I linked you to. There is literally 40 studies there that you can delve deeper into if you wish, but it seems like this: you just do not want to admit that there are some problems associated with this diet because right now you are doing good on it.
I do not want to be rude, but how many of you know that this diet was first designed for epileptic children? How many of your Keto (I do not want to call the gurus, what should I call them?) inform you about this? Why aren't they talking about these kids and some of the outcomes? Do they ever mention them at all? Those are more important questions to ask then questioning me after I gave you 40 studies as your start point.
Thanks @AndBreathe I have been taking this tablet for months now as i was having panic attacks and palpitations due to stress dealing with my ill partner.My BP has improved significantly since I reduced my carbs, and weight trimmed up. I think many folks find similarly.
Ickihun, are you aware of the suggested potential side effects? I'm thinking about the mention of diabetes on here: https://www.drugs.com/bisoprolol.html I'm not trying to discourage you from taking the medication or anything else for that matter, just bringing it to your attention.
We can never compare how the Inuits eat to how we do they have evolved over thousands of years to eat their diet which is mostly fish and meat very high in fat and often eaten raw and not much else most of us would not able to eat that way our digestive system would not be able to cope with itI'm no into all this studying medical research and papers as I don't tend to trust the authors. For me , if the human body depended on carbs then the human race would have died out a long time ago. The eskimos wouldn't have stood a chance as carbs were pretty thin on the ground. No many grass seeds to grind up there!
We can never compare how the Inuits eat to how we do they have evolved over thousands of years to eat their diet which is mostly fish and meat very high in fat and often eaten raw and not much else most of us would not able to eat that way our digestive system would not be able to cope with it
We can compare as since carbohydrates have been introduced into their diet, as it was to ours, their, obesity rate, stroke, heart attacks and diabetes rates have all massively increased. I was also including the Yukip and Aluets not just the Inuits.We can never compare how the Inuits eat to how we do they have evolved over thousands of years to eat their diet which is mostly fish and meat very high in fat and often eaten raw and not much else most of us would not able to eat that way our digestive system would not be able to cope with it
I think you are missing my point.
It is not up to me to trawl through a vague, blog sourced document listing a range of studies and myriad different sub-subjects. Why on earth would I slog through several studies looking for one thing you may have mis remembered, or misquoted? If you have misremembered or misquoted, then I may not even recognise it if I see it.
You brought up the issues, without adequate references, and now you aren't willing to actually specify which is the source of your 'information'? Plus, apparently your opinion is based on other, currently inaccessible studies, which you are unable to name.
As I mentioned in our previous discussion, I am open to any way of eating having pitfalls, but hearsay on the internet is either anecdote, scaremongering, wishful thinking or gossip. That is why accurate references are so valuable.
I'm also totally open to you having an opinion on this. I even agree with you that keto eating has not been studied for long enough periods to 'prove' its safety. But you will notice that I am not throwing out vague references to imply that my opinion is anything more than personal speculation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?