Keto is out for me as I had numbers Of 83!! With my triglycerides. So I have to eat low fat. I also have fatty liver disease and suffer acute pancreatitis.
High fat diet affects all of these organs.
When I did calorie counting and exercise my trigs came down to 1.2 my sugars were still an issue.
Is it possible to have low carb and low fat diet were I still get enough energy?
If so what would you recommend as the max carb intake? At the moment I’m trying not to go over 100g of carbs daily.
I do exercise and have had hypos afterwards. I’m not sure what I can and can’t eat it’s driving me insane ANY ideas are welcome.
Somewhat confused here.Keto is out for me as I had numbers Of 83!! With my triglycerides. So I have to eat low fat. I also have fatty liver disease and suffer acute pancreatitis.
High fat diet affects all of these organs.
When I did calorie counting and exercise my trigs came down to 1.2 my sugars were still an issue.
Is it possible to have low carb and low fat diet were I still get enough energy?
If so what would you recommend as the max carb intake? At the moment I’m trying not to go over 100g of carbs daily.
I do exercise and have had hypos afterwards. I’m not sure what I can and can’t eat it’s driving me insane ANY ideas are welcome.
Somewhat confused here.
The 83 - is that your hb1ac (3 month average bloods)? In which case keto is ideal for that reading.
Triglycerides almost always fall on keto and hdl (good cholesterol that clears the bad) almost always rises, so despite the I’ll informed scare tactics about fat keto usually improves these measures and the ratios. Both of which are far more relevant and risk predictive than simple totals are. Carbs raise these measures way more than fat does.
Non alcoholic fatty liver disease is exactly the reason why some do keto. Again carbs cause more damage than fats do.
low carb and keto don’t have to mean eating huge amounts of fat. It simply means not eating low fat. Protein can be increased for fullness as another option too. Just avoid the highly processed fats that are inflammatory like the seed and veg oils and stick to those that naturally occur.
and what meds are you taking that cause you to hypo? It’s quite unusual that a type 2 on none or just metformin would do so unless they also have another condition such as RH. It could be relevant to how you approach diet changes.
I had similar problems to you regarding my liver and cholesterol so I cut down my fats and upped my protein which helped a lot, I only eat enough fat to satisfy my hunger - I don’t eat high fat just normal natural fats like oily fish, avocados, a few nuts, a little bit of butter and cream. I don’t remove fat from meats etc. I do find to lose weight though I still have to be aware of calories though I don’t count them religiously. Like others say eat to your meter and test if you have room to up your carbs slightly. It may be that you have some wriggle room there
I'm sorry if I'm missing something but a normal trig level is below 150, borderline high is 150-199,just to say 83 was my triglycerides
Just a warning that if you decide to lower your carbs, you must do so gradually because of this medication. Don't suddenly stop most carbs overnight but do it weekly bit by bit of else you run a slight, but real risk of dka because of the gliclazide which has been calculated on a carb heavy dietI’m on Gliclazide one in the morning.
Yesterday I had a two egg omelette with cheese for breakfast, was out for lunch so had a ploughman’s no bread it had ham, 2 types of cheese a bit of pate and a pickle onion and a small spoon of chutney and a bit of salad - I asked for extra lettuce to wrap my cheeses and ham in. Wasn’t very hungry so late dinner/supper 2 cold 97% sausages a few cubes of cold roasted butternut squash - I love all veggies cold and a square of 90% chocThank you for the reply. Could you supply an example of a day of your way of eating. I would inspire
Did you really mean DKA or should that say hypo? Dka is high glucose and high ketones usually and typically caused by lack of insulin (which glic helps you make even more of and as a type 2 hats probably already high). Hypo would be where the amount of glic is in excess to the new lower demands causing too low blood glucose levels.Just a warning that if you decide to lower your carbs, you must do so gradually because of this medication. Don't suddenly stop most carbs overnight but do it weekly bit by bit of else you run a slight, but real risk of dka because of the gliclazide which has been calculated on a carb heavy diet
https://www.nhs.uk/medicines/gliclazide/
I think you might need to check if there’s any decimal points or units attached to that number. Too much fat in the tube? Are you really sure that’s what was happening? Who declared this? What sort of specialist? I’m wondering if you were simply dehydrated and and standard protocol is no more than two attempts at a blood draw by any one professional before a colleague should take over (not necessarily a “specialist”)Thanks for your reply
just to say 83 was my triglycerides they took 3 days to get a blood test as there was to much fat in the tube the called in a specialist to do the test. I’m on Gliclazide one in the morning. Any numbers under 5mmol I start getting the shakes and fast heart beat. I’m so worried about fats. It’s all consuming I’ve got so much going on.
Yes you are right. I was thinking of the 'flozins' with dka. Both the 'flozins' and glicazide can cause hypos but only the flozins show dka as a risk.Did you really mean DKA or should that say hypo? Dka is high glucose and high ketones usually and typically caused by lack of insulin (which glic helps you make even more of and as a type 2 hats probably already high). Hypo would be where the amount of glic is in excess to the new lower demands causing too low blood glucose levels.
It's the opposite of what you think:
View attachment 53958
View attachment 53959
View attachment 53960
I think you might need to check if there’s any decimal points or units attached to that number. Too much fat in the tube? Are you really sure that’s what was happening? Who declared this? What sort of specialist? I’m wondering if you were simply dehydrated and and standard protocol is no more than two attempts at a blood draw by any one professional before a colleague should take over (not necessarily a “specialist”)
Sorry I’m still convinced there’s an error somewhere here. Triglycerides of 83mmol/L equate to over 7000mg/dL. The world record is apparently just over 3000mg. 30mmol is still nearly 3000 mg. Whether it’s figures from one test being reported as another or decimal points being missing or sheer random numbers it makes no sense. I’m shocked that no one is running around doing all sorts of things to you with numbers like this if they are as reported here.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?