• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

LCHF & Cholesterol.


There are also "significant numbers of qualified medical people" (I count myself in those numbers...) who do NOT believe that having a high cholesterol necessarily indicates any pathology or adverse finding at all. It depends on many factors and is not as simplistic as just "having high cholesterol" which is in itself, actually meaningless unless the ratios are known and the particle sizes and probably also the CAC scan results............
Most of the old mantras about T2 are definitely showing signs of changing, thank heavens. The good carb / bad carb / brown rice / white rice advice etc.........
 
My cholesterol level was below average last time it was suggested that I take a statin again. It seems to be a mindless thing they have to d. When I asked if they'd read my reaction to statins at diagnosis it was obvious they had not.
 
My cholesterol level was below average last time it was suggested that I take a statin again. It seems to be a mindless thing they have to d. When I asked if they'd read my reaction to statins at diagnosis it was obvious they had not.
I had the same conversation with a new GP at my practice - until I told him to go back through my notes and find out what happened last time I was on statins. He took one look at the rise, and fall, in hba1c from 48 at diagnosis to 54 then down to non diabetic levels after stopping them that he’s now put statin intolerant on my notes as neither of us wants to risk it happening again.
 
I would add to that another recent study that showed low cholesterol is not helpful for elderly people either.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/he...ittle-cholesterol-is-harmful-for-elderly.html
 
Cholesterol numbers in my signature.. yes they have gone up but am I worried about them? no way..
I'm quite happy to take on my doctors when they mention stains as it seems I now know more than they do about T2 and cholesterol.
So ... my results are in ...
cholesterol 6.8 (usually 4.5)
Triglyceride 0.6
HDL 2.5
LDL 4.0 (usually 2.4)

May I have your thoughts?
 
So ... my results are in ...
cholesterol 6.8 (usually 4.5)
Triglyceride 0.6
HDL 2.5
LDL 4.0 (usually 2.4)

May I have your thoughts?
Brilliant! Your triglycerides are less than 1.0...that's fantastic. My guess is that the increase in total cholesterol is because your HDL (good chol) has gone up so your ratio will actually be better than last time.

Women need higher cholesterol figures as they age anyway. I would be over the moon with your results.
 
So ... my results are in ...
cholesterol 6.8 (usually 4.5)
Triglyceride 0.6
HDL 2.5
LDL 4.0 (usually 2.4)

May I have your thoughts?

Absolutely brilliant results.. Trig/HDL ratio of 0.24 (anything under 0.87 is thought as very good) stunning.
 
Absolutely brilliant results.. Trig/HDL ratio of 0.24 (anything under 0.87 is thought as very good) stunning.
Cheers - Trigs have been 0.5 last 3 years and have gone up to 0.6 -so if the trigs are good is that the main thing do you know and HDL is 1.7, 2.0 and now 2.5 so are they the main ones, LDL was usually 2.4 & 2.5?
 
Cheers - Trigs have been 0.5 last 3 years and have gone up to 0.6 -so if the trigs are good is that the main thing do you know and HDL is 1.7, 2.0 and now 2.5 so are they the main ones, LDL was usually 2.4 & 2.5?

LDL does all sorts of odd things but is interestingly never used to calculate CVD risk.

It is however lowered by statin usage so it has been labelled "bad" to makes drugs companies oodles of money ..

Pfizer made almost $2 bio out of one statin last year.
 
Why do women need higher figures and from roughly what age?
 
Interesting - so - the lower my trigs the better?
 
Its more the ratio between trigs and HDL but yes lower trigs (when fasted for 12-14 hours pre blood test) are far "better" than high trigs.
Many thanks for you help - much appreciated
 
Anyone have any idea how much a cac test costs in the UK? I find it really frustrating that not one website like buoa, nuffield etc will give a price.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn More.…