• Guest, the forum is undergoing some upgrades and so the usual themes will be unavailable for a few days. In the meantime, you can use the forum like normal. We'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

Low carb didn't work for me.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've only had one heated exchange problem with one person here about lchf and that was noblehead who thought it was zero carbs, go figure...

Strange I don't recall us ever having a heated exchange Jack. No one could possibly follow a zero carb diet and stay healthy for very long, so I'm perplexed as to why you thought that I thought LCHF was zero carbs.
 
Reading your posts it's obvious that you have reduced your calories and in so doing reduced your carbs, so I don't understand how low carb didn't work for you

Fair enough, it's part of my journey.
I reduced my calories, by reducing fat to zero initially. Or as close to zero as was possible.
So calories of 800 to 1200, eating to my meter.

Low GI, things like fruit, veg, pulses, salad, anything that didn't spike me.
I lost the weight I wanted to, and now need more to eat to maintain my weight.
Nowhere near the excesses of previously, so in that sense I have reduced my carbs, but also my protein and fat.
Now, it's low fat, good protein, and limited variety of carbs. I'll still eat carbs I'm good with, but that includes some white bread now, if I need to.
Tbh, it includes anything now, if I need to.
If I know it's bad, I'll eat the calories I need, if I'm exercising afterwards.
Or go hungry, if I don't eat.

My biggest problem was when I did try low carb. I found my BS rose higher than I liked when I did eat carbs like beans, wraps, sandwiches, bananas, apples, 'convenience' food, if you like. And saying as I don't choose to spend my time restricted on diet, I introduced carbs back in. For me, my stability is better that way.

It worked for me, but I am normally low GI where possible, and anything when not, and eat around 2000 to 2500 calories a day on a normal day.
 
no at annie


Sent from the Diabetes Forum App
I don't know where you get the idea I am a LCHF hater because I'm not my diet is a mixture of low carbs and low fat I do not eat most high fat food simply because I do not like them.. is that not allowed can we not customise it to suit ourself... if that makes me a LCHF hater then so be it
 
So you cut food, lost weight and ate and now eat to your meter. Low fat diets work and if your meter is ok on the 2000-2500 you do eat. There is no problem.
You may even have found you can eat more carb now without the meter spiking after losing weight
 
That's about it. I lost 30kg in all, which was about 1/4 of my body weight.
I didn't like the look, so I put about 3kg back on.
The difference really is the ability to actually do things I want to. I didn't realise how much the extra weight was holding me back, until it had gone.
 
I've got 40kg to lose, so far I've got rid of 10kg, I'm on 1500 metformin and eat to my meter which is 30g carb max a meal now.
I don't normally eat that many as I want to get rid of my insulin resistance, so the lchf suits me for now.
I'm getting calories from fat to make up the loss of carb calories, but overall it's still calorie negative with normal protein intake

If I went low fat, I would have to take more meds to eat more carbs
 
As I said in another post to you I don't hate LCHF I customise it to suit me and that is all the matters to me. ...I have certainly never said I hate it or rubbished it
 
As I said in another post to you I don't hate LCHF I customise it to suit me and that is all the matters to me. ...I have certainly never said I hate it or rubbished it
But you have Annie. You have said we shouldn't keep pushing it just because it suits so many of us. It's the only thing that has helped me so that's what I used to tell new members to the forum. I can't tell them about diets I don't have faith in. I don't bother any more though.
 
Just putting my feet up for the night. Dinner was another burger, brisket and pulled beef, with a salad, and pushed the boat out with a bit of low fat coleslaw, and a few chilli stuffed olives.
6.2 before food, 6.9 one hour after, even with the can of Coors Light.
I think I can mange another one later.

The only problem I really have here is that all the local pubs do real ale, all within walking distance, one even boasted they have 14 different ales from a range of micro breweries. Too wet and windy for a walk out though.
 
@douglas99 well done on your weight loss and control. I am glad that you have a diet that you have found suits your life style and body; that is all everyone is trying to do.

From what I have read your diet now and weight lose journey is much the same as mine. I will say this though; at diagnosis I reduced carbs down to between 60g and 90g per day (didn't really know what I was doing) and didn't increase fat. The reduced carbs worked in that with the reduced calories as well I rapidly achieved control (aka newcastle). [wonder what would happen with High Carb low Calorie - would it work as well?]

So low carb works, High Fat isn't for everyone so how low people go is a personal threshold. I am still doing about 150g/day (well I was until I injured my legs and haven't been able to exercise so have cut the calories by cutting the carbs).

I do not understand animosity towards any diet. I listen to all, as one day I may need to change my approach, so need to be armed with every piece of information I can get hold of.

Well that's my two penneth
Ever the Diplomat
A
 
I can only speak for myself. Initially my diet was 800 to 1200 calories, minimal fat, some protein. So on ratio, out of the 200g of food that made up the carbs and protein, based on the fact most food was veg or salad, it would by definition a high carb, high fibre. Based on quantity, it was low everything. I put some fat back in when I wanted to maintain my weight, and generally upped the portion sizes. It worked for me, I didn't try to label it, I just ate it and I'm reporting back now.
 
That sounds exactly like me except I got to a certain amount of fat and went more carb to see where I could take it. Didn't find a limit but have gone back down to 150g as I seem happy there. It allows me to have an occasional bread and butter pudding at a restaurant (or eat the occasional pound of peanuts uncontrollably again and again ) but not so silly that I am having to do hours of exercise just to keep my body happy when I do indulge. Even more importantly I find that when I do do an hour on the bike and burn 1000 kcal my bloods stay around the 4.8 to 5.2 no matter the intensity. Stability brings variation in routine.

Keep at it and keep it up
 

What a journey, Douglas. You've kept at it and it has worked. A tip that I can offer is to do your best to steer clear of PROCESSED food, then you will automatically eat the right stuff if most of what you eat hasn't been too processed. It makes a lot of sense, but doesn't mean that you shouldn't dabble with processed food sometimes, 'cos some of it is very nice.

Russ
 
I cannot have HF because as another poster reminded me (I had forgotten) I do not have a gall bladder (the storage is used to break down fat overloads) my gall bladder had 2 stones in it and they filled the whole thing and killed it (gangrenous). I had a pacemaker inserted early this year and I had all the heart tests and family history examined and I got some stern warnings re my chances of hardened arteries (build up of plaque (which killed my brother). I also get gout and gout sufferers have it all the time but diet sends it over the top and it start to crystalise. When a crystal forms or lodges in a joint it agravates the joint and the joint tries to lubricate the joint with fluid (swelling and heat).and of course pain, I was also getting low on potassium, and trending lower towards danger levels.

Those are my diet considerations that I know about re. my bod and that list does not even include diabetes.

So I strongly suggest that before going on any radical diet we should all seek medical advice.

Apart from that I do not have an issue with HF, but what puzzles me is why anyone would choose eating extra grease when extra veg will do the job. The only thing knowing about the LCHF has done for me is made me a bit slacker with grease in my diet which might end being my downfall like my brother.

Re weight loss my medical advice is slower is better because we have a better chance of keeping it off..

Re carb tolerance my medical advice is it gets better with weight loss and then I should increase my carbs..

Unlike a lot of posters in here, I value my medical advice and I pay for it, it is not part of a free service.
 
But that is far from saying

Yes I probably have said that because it is true it is pushed on here as the only suitable diet but thats not saying I hate it personally I have customised it to suit me as I imagine everyone does if they choose to do it
Unlike many people here though I also think about the people it does not suit People come here for diet advice but are never told there are options to LCHF and that there are other diets to be considered if they can't or don't want to do LCHF for whatever reason.. medical conditions etc
You have to be brave like Douglas on this forum to say you eat any other way but LCHF because you only get knocked back about it and told you hate LCHF and are discouraging people from doing it. Is that the way a forum should be totally biased to one diet only no I don't think it should be
 
Interestingly, I was just reading @Pipp thread.
I can see similar results, although I won't claim to be 'post-diabetic' I have certainly had a great improvement with my BS and carb tolerance.

I haven't pushed it though, but fish and chips, (with the batter) cornetto, caramel magnum, have all been tolerated, and seem not to take my much over my self-imposed limit of 8. Not all at once though.

As to 'what is a normal number', that's another question.
I took the liberty of testing most of my family, some reading from them were over 8, so it's not an easy question to answer.

I don't seem to need carbs to excess, if I do eat them, I can put them down, maybe that's the result of the regime of 'portion control' as a nagging voice tells me to stop, no matter what food it is, and if I'm still hungry I distract myself.

As @Russ says, unprocessed food in the way to go, keep the additives out.

Fasting this morning was 5.7, so the salads seen to be working again, and the scales are going the right way.

As a long term plan, particularly after reading the other thread, I think I will have a trial of the Newcastle diet in November, and see if I can improve my tolerance to carbs even more. So thanks to @Pipp for posting that.
I'll have a chat to my doctor, they are supportive, and see what they can offer me.
(The only downside is I may turn into a skeleton, so it could be a shortened version)
Coffee break over, back to more work!
 

No of course that's not the way a forum should be Annie, but I also feel I have to be brave to mention LCHF! I am not brave enough to answer new members questions now. That can't be right either. I havn't noticed people jumping in with advice about other diets though and although I follow LCHF because it's the only thing that has worked for me, I hate it because I'm not fond of protein without 'white carbs'. So if anyone really has a decent alternative diet that will help me lose weight and keep my BG's down I would love to hear it.
 
You can get bile salts to substitute
You can't be high carb and high fat, it will kill you, so go easy on the grease

For fun google lchf stuff about fat deposits and lipids
Statins are good for you too and even low doses for vascular inflammation
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn More.…