You are singing from the old hymn sheet here. Recent studies and research published last year, and even last week, is beginning to show that there is no significant correlation between CVE and LDL level, especially the iscaemic events you describe. There is also evidence showing that plaques are not LDL getting trapped, but oxidised trigs called sLDL which is not the same thing at all.What is atherosclerosis?
One type of cardiovascular disease includes physical blockages that can stop blood flow in the coronary vessels and cause ischemia of the heart muscle. When this is severe and sudden, this is what is commonly referred to as myocardial infarction or a "heart attack." However, years of coronary artery disease typically precede the attack with gradual narrowing and blocking of the blood vessels. The blockages are formed by lipid or cholesterol deposits that cause inflammation and form plaques. These plaques calcify, block the vessels, and limit blood flow to the heart muscle. This process is called atherosclerosis. The plaques can also rupture, releasing a thrombus or clot that can block blood flow downstream and cause ischemia (decreased oxygen delivery to tissues) elsewhere in the heart or brain.
Because the body was not designed to have high levels of cholesterol (specifically LDL) in the blood, immune cells called macrophages move it into the blood vessel walls to get it out of the circulation. In this process, it becomes oxidized, and this is what triggers the inflammatory process. The macrophages become overwhelmed with the oxidized LDL, try to engulf it, becoming "foam cells." These foam cells trigger the need for further "clean up," and the body tries to sequester the unhealthy foam cells and forms a hard plaque around it. These plaques cause further inflammation within the tissue of the artery wall; this is how atherosclerosis progresses.
There are differences between how atherosclerosis develops in men and women. https://www.medicinenet.com/heart_disease_in_women/article.htm
You are singing from the old hymn sheet here. Recent studies and research published last year, and even last week, is beginning to show that there is no significant correlation between CVE and LDL level, especially the iscaemic events you describe. There is also evidence showing that plaques are not LDL getting trapped, but oxidised trigs called sLDL which is not the same thing at all.
Rocking my tuna lunch today!!and there is mounting information that the initial inflammation causing "things" to get stuck is caused by too much omega 6 and too little omega 3 in the western diet.
https://medium.com/@Kahn642/the-new...alth-eat-like-a-bolivian-tsimane-5815e333a100 These guys eat only 14% total fat ,hardly any of it saturated. They have the lowest rates of heart disease known in the world.Yes, but are there any studies that show reducing saturated fat intake to less than 6% of calories is actually healthy?
The AHA has been giving advice for decades and yet the rates at which death from atherosclerosis continue to spiral even with the advent of statins. The ADA and its British counterpart still push the low fat mantra and yet the rate of T2 and obesity has reached epidemic proportions. Decades of advice and even in the face of mounting criticism it continues. The fear of sat fat was promoted and sustained by decades of bad advice based on shoddy science.
They also have a small gene pool that is uncorrupted by the genes associated with diabetes, so may be protected by their isolation. They do not yet have mod cons, and the industrial pollution that goes with it and which is suspected as leading to DNA damage and inflammation, leading in turn to atherosclerosis. They lead a very active life with 90% of daylight hours occupied with physical activity. They do not have access to transfats or added sugar or any refined food sources. They have a Low GI diet, which is found to be of benefit to some diabetics (Mediterranean diet is considered low GI) so this news is not unexpected.https://medium.com/@Kahn642/the-new...alth-eat-like-a-bolivian-tsimane-5815e333a100 These guys eat only 14% total fat ,hardly any of it saturated. They have the lowest rates of heart disease known in the world.
But are they particularly healthy overall? The following suggests they aren't:https://medium.com/@Kahn642/the-new...alth-eat-like-a-bolivian-tsimane-5815e333a100 These guys eat only 14% total fat ,hardly any of it saturated. They have the lowest rates of heart disease known in the world.
But are they particularly healthy overall? The following suggests they aren't:
View attachment 24900
View attachment 24901
View attachment 24902
View attachment 24904
I think I'm right in saying organic chicken better. No added steroids or water.There is also the idea that all fat from animal sources is saturated.
Chicken - a whole one oven ready - is likely to be 14 percent fat, but only 4 percent saturated fat.
This is what Webmd says about CRP.But are they particularly healthy overall? The following suggests they aren't:
View attachment 24900
View attachment 24901
View attachment 24902
View attachment 24904
Added steroids and water? That would be illegal to offer for sale.I think I'm right in saying organic chicken better. No added steroids or water.
More recent info says their life expectancy is now 53.This is what Webmd says about CRP.
https://www.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/c-reactive-protein-test#1
The Lancet study report does indicate high levels of inflammation in the population, but does not elaborate on what it means for them in long term health terms. I wonder how many centagenerians there are? Certainly the Lancet report is giving a longer life expectancy than the statistics you give here, but what is your source? I note the Lancet report does not seem to declare their source either. I am suspicious of this Professor Kahn and his institute as a reliable centre for study. A study size of 706 is quite small compared to say the Harvard Nurses study (which is ongoing).
Edit to add: In addition I used to subscribe to Medium Daily Digest too, because Dr Jason Fung contributes regularly to it, but I have had to give it up now since I found it was publishing any old rubbish and not a reliable journal to quote. It is linked to a media company that has a distinct commercial interest in alternative health that I find interfering and misleading.
Not me. The paper that this is based on even states that the reason for their low calcium scores is not known. It may have nothing to do with their low saturated fat intake. I'm guessing that the reasons for their low calcium scores are that they don't eat sugar, refined carbs, or processed food and lead a less stressful and more active life than westerners.Their sat fat intake is less than 6% of cals, their total fat intake 14%, protein 14% also. Their arteries are clean as a whistle even at age 85, despite far higher levels of inflammation than ours. That's enough to convince me to avoid saturated fat like the plague in order to have less clogged arteries.
Their sat fat intake is less than 6% of cals, their total fat intake 14%, protein 14% also. Their arteries are clean as a whistle even at age 85, despite far higher levels of inflammation than ours. That's enough to convince me to avoid saturated fat like the plague in order to have less clogged arteries.
Not me. The paper that this is based on even states that the reason for their low calcium scores is not known. It may have nothing to do with their low saturated fat intake. I'm guessing that the reasons for their low calcium scores are that they don't eat sugar, refined carbs, or processed food and lead a less stressful and more active life than westerners.
I am inclined to avoid omega 6s because I know they are inflammatory. But quite how they are inflammatory (where they cause inflammation ), I don't know. I have also heard lots of people including posters on here say they are bad for you, but they never say in what way. Do you have any links to information on the ill effects of seed oils and how they are caused?I also guess that they don't consume seed oils and vegetable oils that contain massive amounts of the highly inflammatory omega 6. All these cheap oils are used in processed foods, take-aways, fast food, ready meals, pies and pastries etc. They are the danger foods, not natural real foods like meat, fish, dairy etc.
http://healthyeating.sfgate.com/omega-6-harmful-8622.htmlI am inclined to avoid omega 6s because I know they are inflammatory. But quite how they are inflammatory (where they cause inflammation ), I don't know. I have also heard lots of people including posters on here say they are bad for you, but they never say in what way. Do you have any links to information on the ill effects of seed oils and how they are caused?
I am inclined to avoid omega 6s because I know they are inflammatory. But quite how they are inflammatory (where they cause inflammation ), I don't know. I have also heard lots of people including posters on here say they are bad for you, but they never say in what way. Do you have any links to information on the ill effects of seed oils and how they are caused?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?