bowell said:
Here you go me lord next case :wink:
http://www.eortrial.co.uk/default.aspx?id=1035916
an Interesting stat i found
The employees with the highest success rates at tribunal were those who alleged that they
had diabetes ?
Now that is a long and complicated one. I think the final judgement was right though in that they blamed the kid and the school.
The kid was definatley at fault, but he was a kid. If the school had said "No you can't come on this trip until we know you are doing things right" and then let him join in again once he'd proved he wasn't going to make the same mistake again then the school would have got away with it. They seem to have just decided that as a diabetic had had a hypo on a previous trip tey are now banned from any activity.
If another kid had misbehaved in some way on a trip would they then have been banned forever from taking part in any further trips, or would they be excluded from one as a punishment but then let back again after that?