- Messages
- 4,388
- Location
- Suffolk, UK
- Type of diabetes
- Type 2
- Treatment type
- Tablets (oral)
- Dislikes
- Diet drinks - the artificial sweeteners taste vile.
Having to forswear foods I have loved all my life.
Trying to find low carb meals when eating out.
I have read in various places that Metformin cannot give you a real hypo (BG less than 4, I think) - firstly, is this true?
We visited a friend from years back last weekend and it turned out that we are both T2 diabetics.
I am still on diet and exercise, but he (if I understand corrrectly) is on Metformin.
There are T1s in their family/friends so they are familiar with hypos, and they say that he has to eat regular small amounts to avoid hypos, and can get very distracted and irritable if he doesn't do this.
I suspect that he may be having 'false' hypos as discussed extensively here but this assumes that Metformin cannot give you 'real' hypos.
Which brings me on to 'false' hypos.
Does this chain of logic hold up?
A hypo is your brain reacting to a lack of blood sugar - essential to power the brain.
[Or does something apart from the brain trigger the symptoms - the wooziness being a secondary effect?]
Diabetes can be the inability to get sugar out of the blood and into the tissues - insulin resistance.
Can your brain be insulin resaistant?
i.e. be unable to effectively remove and utilise sugar from the blood.
Or is it only the major organs and body tissues?
Because if the brain is insulin resistant then the hypo could be real - the brain running out of fuel because it can't extract the sugar from the bloodstream despite the reasonably high level.
The alternative is that there is a warning mechanism in the brain designed to slow down or stop activity before the body crashes due to total lack of blood sugar, and this has been recalibrated by constantly high blood sugar levels.
So which is it?
[and does this mean that if you run at constantly low blood sugar levels the warning level will be recalibrated downwards so that you can go very low without hypo symptoms?]
Which finally brings me to the best way to treat 'false' hypos.
Do you treat them just like real hypos and hope that in time your body recalibrates the warning level, or do you tough it out to force your body to recalibrate?
It seems possible that if you treat false hypos like real ones you are maintaining your blood sugar levels artificially high and you may take a much longer time to get your numbers down.
Are false hyops, in fact, a good thing?
Should you be cheering them on (after testing to confirm BG levels) because they are a sign that your treatment and diet are reall working well?
Usual warnings about driving and operating machinery obviously apply.
Cheers
LGC
We visited a friend from years back last weekend and it turned out that we are both T2 diabetics.
I am still on diet and exercise, but he (if I understand corrrectly) is on Metformin.
There are T1s in their family/friends so they are familiar with hypos, and they say that he has to eat regular small amounts to avoid hypos, and can get very distracted and irritable if he doesn't do this.
I suspect that he may be having 'false' hypos as discussed extensively here but this assumes that Metformin cannot give you 'real' hypos.
Which brings me on to 'false' hypos.
Does this chain of logic hold up?
A hypo is your brain reacting to a lack of blood sugar - essential to power the brain.
[Or does something apart from the brain trigger the symptoms - the wooziness being a secondary effect?]
Diabetes can be the inability to get sugar out of the blood and into the tissues - insulin resistance.
Can your brain be insulin resaistant?
i.e. be unable to effectively remove and utilise sugar from the blood.
Or is it only the major organs and body tissues?
Because if the brain is insulin resistant then the hypo could be real - the brain running out of fuel because it can't extract the sugar from the bloodstream despite the reasonably high level.
The alternative is that there is a warning mechanism in the brain designed to slow down or stop activity before the body crashes due to total lack of blood sugar, and this has been recalibrated by constantly high blood sugar levels.
So which is it?
[and does this mean that if you run at constantly low blood sugar levels the warning level will be recalibrated downwards so that you can go very low without hypo symptoms?]
Which finally brings me to the best way to treat 'false' hypos.
Do you treat them just like real hypos and hope that in time your body recalibrates the warning level, or do you tough it out to force your body to recalibrate?
It seems possible that if you treat false hypos like real ones you are maintaining your blood sugar levels artificially high and you may take a much longer time to get your numbers down.
Are false hyops, in fact, a good thing?
Should you be cheering them on (after testing to confirm BG levels) because they are a sign that your treatment and diet are reall working well?
Usual warnings about driving and operating machinery obviously apply.
Cheers
LGC