borofergie said:Is it UNDETECTED diabetes that causes a problem for the NHS finances or DETECTED diabetes?
Doe the cost of TREATMENT outweigh the cost of POTENTIAL COMPLICATIONS?
Maybe they don't want lots more of us on the books, asking them for expensive BG testing strips?
The treatment regime they suggest doesn't do much good for the majority of T2 diabetics anyway, so even if they pay for (ineffective) treatment, it doesn't necessarily reduce the cost of complications.
lucylocket61 said:The Media reporting is partly to blame for people not being aware. They have been brainwashed into thinking "I am not overweight, so I cant have type 2 diabetes"
they are not being informed that slim people get Diabetes too, so they think they are immune.
A bit like it used to be with passive smoke and lung cancer. It wasnt being picked up in non-smokers because of the way it was presented as a disease of smokers only.
smidge said:Hi GraceK!
There are mobile testing units in some areas of the country. I saw a news article on a mobile diabetes unit that goes to various locations in Leicester. Basically, there is a high Asian population in Leicester and that part of the community are more prone to diabetes and less likely to visit hospitals/surgeries for testing, so they take the unit out into the community. Looked like a good idea, but I'm not sure if other areas of the country do the same.
Smidge
catherinecherub said:Here's what happened when people in the U.S. were given personal assessments of their risk for heart disease and diabetes.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 104043.htm
The public perception of Type2 diabetes has been media fuelled to say that obesity and inactive lifestyles are the culprit and until that perception changes people will bury their heads in the sand. Whether we like it or not, there is a stigma attached to Type2. There is no mention of the 20% of normal weight people who develop Type2. It is also seen as a disease of the elderly which it was until a few years ago. You would be surprised how many people do not read newspapers or watch TV adverts about health. I often wonder if the answer is to post flyers through every house in the country explaining more about diabetes and it's symptoms and possible effects. The need for observation and symptoms with regard to meningitis in children got the message across so why not diabetes?
I was thinking that a flyer with an obese person and a slim person standing together, side by side and the question, "Who is at risk for Type2 diabetes? Answer, "Both as genetics also play a large part". It could also include symptoms and risks.
catherinecherub said:Here's what happened when people in the U.S. were given personal assessments of their risk for heart disease and diabetes.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 104043.htm
The public perception of Type2 diabetes has been media fuelled to say that obesity and inactive lifestyles are the culprit and until that perception changes people will bury their heads in the sand. Whether we like it or not, there is a stigma attached to Type2. There is no mention of the 20% of normal weight people who develop Type2. It is also seen as a disease of the elderly which it was until a few years ago. You would be surprised how many people do not read newspapers or watch TV adverts about health. I often wonder if the answer is to post flyers through every house in the country explaining more about diabetes and it's symptoms and possible effects. The need for observation and symptoms with regard to meningitis in children got the message across so why not diabetes?
I was thinking that a flyer with an obese person and a slim person standing together, side by side and the question, "Who is at risk for Type2 diabetes? Answer, "Both as genetics also play a large part". It could also include symptoms and risks.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?