I agree that the hierarchy of evidence is important when interpreting research - in a perfect world. However, when industry funds RCT's or in other ways tries to control or manipulate the message to one that benefits their product (Big Tobacco, Big Sugar), or restricts access to research studies (for example, restricted access to Statin studies) then there is a problem.
Here is a link to a wonderful presentation by Dr. Rob Lustig and colleagues from yesterday which describes (among a host of other things) how the evidence can be manipulated, and how the food industry and their trade organizations with deep pockets have managed to control the message and influence public policy so well since at least the 1940's, giving us the metabolic mayhem we see today throughout the world:
https://lecture.ucsf.edu/ets/Play/9c2c1a8eaf4249c7b841471a5f7aa8141d
The presentation starts at 7:30 minutes into the recording, so fast forward to begin. It's almost 2 hours long but well worth the time IMHO. In the interests of full disclosure - I do have massive confirmation bias when it comes the points of view expressed in the presentation!