Agreed @Pipp ND will bring your bg's down but we have to work to keep them there. I am using shake that weight but as said if you are not fond of sweet you might not like it that much but I am diluting it with more water than recommended. Banana flavour was the worst out of them all, if you like coffee Caffè latte is really nice and so are others. But I hate sweet coffees as wellbut yes it's a good product and I take 3 of those shakes making it about 400 cals and about 200gm of soup, that can't be 200 calories but I think that's what's mentioned. I am so confused with the vegetable portion as at one place it says you have to eat 240g veggies split into 3 time but then below it also says 200ml soup. So just to be safe I take one soup of allowed veggies which is 200grams and put 3 grams of oil. All in all I should be about 600 calories. For a change yesterday I had salad and weighed it to make exactly 50 calories but that looked huge. Although we're allowed 200 cals of veggies I don't know the reason behind such a small quantity of soup. I don't use stock so I make it purely out of water. My 200 gram soup can not be 200 calories.
Any suggestions?
Am I doing anything wrong or understood wrong.
Are you getting support? Gp or nurse? What about medication?Hi all t2 is very confusing isn't it lol
I checked my bloods yday after I'd had white bread, wowsers Sky high, in late teens!! then today scrambled egg and grilled bacon for breakfast, a cheeky 14 mile bike ride checked my bloods and 6.9!!! Which atm for me is low!
I'm looking forward to redoing the diet again and getting right into the exercise again.
Me and gf have put together a gym in garage, very lucky to be able to do that I appreciate, but when I did it last time I soon realised exercise is also key to the diet.
I was really quite fit by the end but lost a lot of muscle mass and looked like a bobble head, going to try to focus on keeping my size, muscle wise, but lose the fat internally and externally is my goal.
I know my sugars will be fine as will cholesterol etc, but there's no denying its going to be tough but going to do it
Did you use any supplements your first go 'round, especially the essential fatty acids (or were they included in the Lipotrim?)I will have a look and get back to you. Limited time online at the moment.
I have tended not to worry too much about the quantity of veg. Usually base homemade soups on celery leeks and green veg, with herbs for flavour. If I am going to do this again properly then I need to study the options. My original ND was with Lipotrim, which is Total Food Replacement, so didn't have to concern myself with any other food. Will read up the Newcastle papers and Shake that Weight literature and report back. I won't be making a start for about a week though. Got too much going on at the moment to be committed to it. It had to be perfect!
How familiar are you with the findings of the Newcastle study? To explain it all would take some time, it would be good to know what you know.I'm no expert so I might be wrong far off the mark etc but ... this place often sounds like a diet club ... I understand why but ... but but but .... I thought the idea was to change your lifestyle not have a diet here a diet there do eight weeks twelve weeks this club that club and so on.
I was told I had a disease that might cause me to lose limbs go blind feel **** and so on.
Told do something about it or suffer.
I chose the do something about it option and changed my lifestyle.
Changed my approach to food forever ... not eight weeks or twelve weeks.
I'm doing great having made that decision.
I slip and do not so great for a few hours maybe a day but I know why I know the risks etc.
So please explain to me in simple terms why all this temporary dieting and then planning on something else when that diet comes to an end etc.
But in other news, the most common form of T2 is indeed a metabolic disorder, so talk of diet is almost always going to be front and center. Over on the cancer boards, it would be strange to openly wonder why everyone is talking about "radiation this" and "chemotherapy that."I'm no expert so I might be wrong far off the mark etc but ... this place often sounds like a diet club ... I understand why but ... but but but .... I thought the idea was to change your lifestyle not have a diet here a diet there do eight weeks twelve weeks this club that club and so on.
I was told I had a disease that might cause me to lose limbs go blind feel **** and so on.
Told do something about it or suffer.
I chose the do something about it option and changed my lifestyle.
Changed my approach to food forever ... not eight weeks or twelve weeks.
I'm doing great having made that decision.
I slip and do not so great for a few hours maybe a day but I know why I know the risks etc.
So please explain to me in simple terms why all this temporary dieting and then planning on something else when that diet comes to an end etc.
Ahhh ... it sounds like I've done something very similar without realising.How familiar are you with the findings of the Newcastle study? To explain it all would take some time, it would be good to know what you know.
But in short, this "8 weeks this" "12 weeks that" is specifically going on a Very Low Calorie Diet, which has been medically shown to reverse Type 2 diabetes. Specifically, it has been shown to restore beta cell function to the point where insulin production is normal, increase liver sensitivity to insulin even better than normal, and eliminate unhealthy levels of glucose dumping by the liver. 12 weeks after such a diet, the large majority of participants were able to pass an oral glucose tolerance test, and there are folks right here on the forums who saw restored carb metabolism (eat like a normal person and have good BG levels) after this type of VLCD.
As you can also see, it's not a long term solution - it's a method of rapidly losing weight without becoming malnourished, "defatting" the pancreas and liver to restore metabolic function (proven through some seriously heavy MRI work on the study participants). Afterwards, it is still your job to maintain a healthy lifestyle (a minority of study participants failed that OGTT 12 weeks after ending the diet).
Yes, my lay understanding is that weightloss in general - if has to be significant, but not necessarily quick - might hold the key to reversal, even in "thin" Type 2/metabolic disorder diabetics (with the understanding that some just would not be able to get thin enough and drew the short end of the genetic stick on this one point).Ahhh ... it sounds like I've done something very similar without realising.
I hit the LCHF thing running.
Total cold turkey for weeks from carbs... not really sure how many.
My results are almost none diabetic results on my last check.
No I din't know the details BUT THANKS FOR EXPLAINING.
i MISUnDerstood and thought it was just another temporary diet thing.
Thankyou.
Good morning .... 5.30 a.m here ... and thank you for your time and explanation.Yes, my lay understanding is that weightloss in general - if has to be significant, but not necessarily quick - might hold the key to reversal, even in "thin" Type 2/metabolic disorder diabetics (with the understanding that some just would not be able to get thin enough and drew the short end of the genetic stick on this one point).
The "Newcastle" diet is just a VLCD, which has drawbacks . . . But generally speaking, so does being obese, so in some cases the benefits more than outweigh the potential drawbacks. In other cases, measured weight loss makes more sense (if you can manage it - in some crazy way, VLCDs can actually be easier than traditional dieting). But of course, with traditional dieting, you're already learning your new lifestyle choice, whereas with a VLCD it would be suicidal to maintain that diet indefinitely. So the transition at the end can be more jarring for VLCD goers . . . But that's tempered by the fact that going on a VLCD can help you (well, it helped me) appreciate food as a fuel from a distance, without having it in your face all the time. When I'm done with my VLCD, I'll have spent two months with no fast food, no trashy snack foods, no going-alone-to-the -buffet and getting my money's worth, no stuffing myself with carbs for dinner then having a late night carb meal again because I'm still hungry. I could redevelop those bad habits, and if I do I will have one person to blame, but this period of rest and willpower has given me more strength than I thought I had when it came to diet, and I think it will carry over for the rest of my life.
And it works - it worked in a clinical trial, it anecdotally worked for a LOT of people after the study and it appears to already be working for me. From a dangerous A1C at diagnosis and scary fasting blood glucose levels even on 20g of carbs a day, I've seen my BG come under insane control . . .and my diet is over 100g of carbs/day, with over 50 of those grams coming from sugars. Last week I cheated (of sorts) and had a meal that included a baked potato, French dressing on a salad, and the most sugary cake you can imagine, and within 2 hours my BG was in the 80 mg/dL range (oh how I wish I would have been able to test at one hour!)
I'll shut up,now, I could talk for hours, and after viewing your profile, I see you've been around the block a time or two already
Good luck! Hope it goes well! I could do with some motivation at the mo' as have slipped a bit with LCHF (stressful times - house move, job change) and drunk too much wine and eaten some **** as of late. Weight wise not too much damage but sugars not as great as normal. Won't join in the Newcastle but will get back to LCHF and join you on the journey! HugsxI know what the doctor will say so I'm happy enough to just crack on. I will go after three months for a full blood work up but I have a bench mark set of stats to compare.
Did you use any supplements your first go 'round, especially the essential fatty acids (or were they included in the Lipotrim?)
I'm no expert so I might be wrong far off the mark etc but ... this place often sounds like a diet club ... I understand why but ... but but but .... I thought the idea was to change your lifestyle not have a diet here a diet there do eight weeks twelve weeks this club that club and so on.
I was told I had a disease that might cause me to lose limbs go blind feel **** and so on.
Told do something about it or suffer.
I chose the do something about it option and changed my lifestyle.
Changed my approach to food forever ... not eight weeks or twelve weeks.
I'm doing great having made that decision.
I slip and do not so great for a few hours maybe a day but I know why I know the risks etc.
So please explain to me in simple terms why all this temporary dieting and then planning on something else when that diet comes to an end etc.
Interestingly, I needed major abdominal surgery 2 years after ND. I asked the surgeon how my liver had looked as he had to rejig much my abdominal organs. His response was that he had been surprised at the minimal visceral fat present. Most of the fat was subcutaneous fat.How familiar are you with the findings of the Newcastle study? To explain it all would take some time, it would be good to know what you know.
But in short, this "8 weeks this" "12 weeks that" is specifically going on a Very Low Calorie Diet, which has been medically shown to reverse Type 2 diabetes. Specifically, it has been shown to restore beta cell function to the point where insulin production is normal, increase liver sensitivity to insulin even better than normal, and eliminate unhealthy levels of glucose dumping by the liver. 12 weeks after such a diet, the large majority of participants were able to pass an oral glucose tolerance test, and there are folks right here on the forums who saw restored carb metabolism (eat like a normal person and have good BG levels) after this type of VLCD.
As you can also see, it's not a long term solution - it's a method of rapidly losing weight without becoming malnourished, "defatting" the pancreas and liver to restore metabolic function (proven through some seriously heavy MRI work on the study participants). Afterwards, it is still your job to maintain a healthy lifestyle (a minority of study participants failed that OGTT 12 weeks after ending the diet).
Hi all I think the one thing that needs to be said is T2 disbetes is directly controllable by what you put in your mouth.
I'm am starting the eight week phase again to get my sugars under tight control, I will then eat a sensible low calorie low carb diet for the rest of my life, something I didn't do at end of last eight weeks, much to my regret.
I got on scales this morning
16st 1.6lb
BG 13
I know that by next Monday this will be a lot better which is quite amazing really.
Gym for an hour tonight, slim fast through day, salad and meat for tea, no eating late at night, no alcohol for eight weeks and very low carbs forever.
I was annoyed with myself initially but am now embracing the programme again abs looking forward to eight weeks time when I will have changed, my eye sight will be like a s*^+ house rat, I will be fit, slimmer, healthy, no mood swings, and excellent by control, here we go lol
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?