NewdestinyX
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 205
Sorry to disagree (I think), KaMon. People who are still elevated above 7 or 8mmol after 2-3 hours are pretty much "prediabetic" by any medical Dr I've ever consulted out there on this topic or whose work I've ever read. Ask your own. I think they'll agree. Please don't attach links to 'blogs'. The only real worthwhile evidence on these topics are peer reviewed studies, test books and articles from Google Scholar. I have a very high standard for 'proof texts' on these sort of topics.Ka-Mon said:I have personally tested many non-diabetics and some even after a "normal" portion of chips were still in the 7's even 2 hours after meals meaning that they definitely must have been at a higher spike after only one hour. Same as diabetics, non-diabetics are also not all the same and some will spike depending on the size of the meal they've eaten and the amount of movement/exercise undertaken.
The thing that differentiates a -non-diabetic to a diabetic is that under normal circumstances (ie: eating normal portions) the non-diabetics "spike" will fall within 2 hours post-meal but definitely not all of them as I found out personally, especially if they eat a large (ish) meal.
Thanks for the education about the state of things there, Viv. Very helpful! Wow -- T2's with NO meters at all is the goal??? Whew.. That makes me glad to live on this side of the ocean... :wink:viviennem said:Testing is a matter of expense, I'm afraid, Grant, at least here in the UK.
As you'll have seen from some of the other threads, some of our Primary Care Trusts are withdrawing strips from Type 2s; some GPs think Type 2s don't need to test; others limit us to one pot of 50 strips per month, unless you have a cast-iron case for having more.Viv 8)
For obvious reasons we won't get into THAT hornet's nest conversation... :lol:viviennem said:Oh, we have our advantages, Grant.........
Following the X-ray I've been referred to the orthopaedic surgeon, whom I shall be seeing in a week or so, and then getting a CT scan. if appropriate I'll be listed for surgery, probably in less than 2 months. And all for free!
That's sadly true in the US too, Viv..Those of us who have diabetes, have to do our best to educate those who don't - starting with doctors! :lol:
Viv 8)
Again, I won't take the bait on the comparison of the 2 health care systems. Each has strengths and weaknesses.jopar said:As to whether it's better health care wise this side of the pond or your side of the pond, belive me this side is actually better... We get health care which isn't marked on what health care insurance cover you can afford and when my PCT agreed to fund my insulin pump they fund it all, I don't have to pay a percentage of anything such as the insulin or the consumables! the only problem is every now and again I get a debate with my doctors practice prescription manager concerning how I can't control my diabetes with a pump on the 50 test strips she thinks I should and not the amount I say I need! but hey hole small price to pay..
NewdestinyX said:I've also see the kind of Google charts as Sid just posted. But 'spiked' readings up and over 11 I have to believe are just not normal for the diabetic. It's not about what I 'believe', it's about reliable sources I read like: 'Anatomy and Physiology books, of which I have several and it's about what endocrinologists and GP's tell me and whose writings I've read.
Are you really going to keep saying that 'most' non diabetics hit these levels when even your own data states caveats like they were of 'higher BMI' than normal, etc.. Probably prediabetic by any medical standard out there. It is a 'fact', Sid, no matter how much 'caveat bearing data' you bring that 'normal blood glucose reaction is exactly as my chart shows it to be. I trapped myself in this argument a little (won't make that mistake again) by making the 'contrast' with that ever changing 'word' -diabetic versus NON diabetic. There's too much wiggle room there and you were right to 'drive a truck' through my imprecise argument.Sid Bonkers said:NewdestinyX said:I've also see the kind of Google charts as Sid just posted. But 'spiked' readings up and over 11 I have to believe are just not normal for the diabetic. It's not about what I 'believe', it's about reliable sources I read like: 'Anatomy and Physiology books, of which I have several and it's about what endocrinologists and GP's tell me and whose writings I've read.
Here is another paper sent to me by someone last night.
http://www.springerlink.com/content/a55 ... ltext.html
Extract:
Results
We found that 93% of participants reached glucose concentrations above the IGT threshold of 7.8 mmol/l and spent a median of 26 min/day above this level during continuous glucose monitoring. Eight individuals (10%) spent more than 2 h in the IGT range. They had higher HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), age and BMI than those who did not. Seven participants (9%) reached glucose concentrations above 11.1 mmol/l during monitoring.
Again clearly stating that non diabetics can and do spike and that 93% of participants hit higher levels than 7.8 mmol/L and that 9% hit levels above11.1 mmol/L.
Are you really going to keep on arguing your point even after being presented with these facts?
You may not choose to believe the facts but they are still the facts.
You wrap your assertion in so many caveats that it is dangerously close to being a tautology: you may as well say that BG control is perfectly normal in people who have perfectly normal BG control.NewdestinyX said:... NORMAL BLOOD GLUCOSE curves 'NEVER', for any substantive length of time, rise/spike above 7-8mmol in otherwise 'healthy people' at their proper BMI, unless 'pre-diabetes' is at hand. ...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?