borofergie said:xyzzy said:Taking Omega 3 is apparently a good way of reducing insulin resistance (at least in mice) because of its anti inflammatory action I upped my Omega 3 to 2g a day after reading this well known study.
Supplementing Omega 3 is a pretty bad idea unless you seriously cut back on your Omega 6s. If you're eating vegetable oils (seed oils are worst, but even olive oil is bad), anything grain based, or animals that eat grain (chicken being the worst) then your 6 to 3 ratio will be so out of kilter that there is not point in taking Omega 3. The ideal ratio is 2 to 4:1. Most people run at 15:1 or more.
That's one of the central tenets of the Paleo thing: we didn't evolve to eat grains, and our food chain is so polluted by them, that we all get a massive overdose of Omega 6s which competes for receptors with Omega 3s. This means that Omega 3 in your fish oil doesn't get utilised properly, and all you're doing is increasing your intake of unhealthy polyunsaturated fatty acids.
I try and eat a bit of oily fish, but try and avoid anything that derives from grains, especially vegetable oils (I limit my olive oil intake).
http://www.archevore.com/panu-weblog/month/may-2009
xyzzy said:borofergie said:xyzzy said:Taking Omega 3 is apparently a good way of reducing insulin resistance (at least in mice) because of its anti inflammatory action I upped my Omega 3 to 2g a day after reading this well known study.
Supplementing Omega 3 is a pretty bad idea unless you seriously cut back on your Omega 6s. If you're eating vegetable oils (seed oils are worst, but even olive oil is bad), anything grain based, or animals that eat grain (chicken being the worst) then your 6 to 3 ratio will be so out of kilter that there is not point in taking Omega 3. The ideal ratio is 2 to 4:1. Most people run at 15:1 or more.
That's one of the central tenets of the Paleo thing: we didn't evolve to eat grains, and our food chain is so polluted by them, that we all get a massive overdose of Omega 6s which competes for receptors with Omega 3s. This means that Omega 3 in your fish oil doesn't get utilised properly, and all you're doing is increasing your intake of unhealthy polyunsaturated fatty acids.
I try and eat a bit of oily fish, but try and avoid anything that derives from grains, especially vegetable oils (I limit my olive oil intake).
http://www.archevore.com/panu-weblog/month/may-2009
Right Stephen recognise you're the resident expert on all of this but not all of us want to do the caveman paleo thing to the level you do. So if I want to eat chicken and fry my bacon and egg in a bit of olive oil (yes did swap) and have a slice of Burgen a day but rarely eat products that are rich in fish oils what's the suggestion then.
The insulin resistance Omega 3 research is well known and pretty respected so I believe there is something in it. Any suggestions?
xyzzy said:Right Stephen recognise you're the resident expert on all of this but not all of us want to do the caveman paleo thing to the level you do. So if I want to eat chicken and fry my bacon and egg in a bit of olive oil (yes did swap) and have a slice of Burgen a day but rarely eat products that are rich in fish oils what's the suggestion then.
The insulin resistance Omega 3 research is well known and pretty respected so I believe there is something in it. Any suggestions?
borofergie said:best of all lard or dripping
xyzzy said:There you go. My mum was right all along. She used lard for cooking and fry-ups etc. When I got married back in the depths of time I weighed in just under 10 stone with a 28" waist. It makes me smile now that as a lad in the 60's and 70's it wasn't until I gained some independence that I ever came across pasta or rice (except creamy rice pudding for pud) or pizza etc. She wouldn't do "foreign" stuff so I never got it.
I doubt the Grannies round here used lard for cooking.That's exactly the point: your mum was right, your gran(s) were right, all your great-grans were right, etc, etc, all the way back to Mitochondrial Eve
borofergie said:xyzzy said:There you go. My mum was right all along. She used lard for cooking and fry-ups etc. When I got married back in the depths of time I weighed in just under 10 stone with a 28" waist. It makes me smile now that as a lad in the 60's and 70's it wasn't until I gained some independence that I ever came across pasta or rice (except creamy rice pudding for pud) or pizza etc. She wouldn't do "foreign" stuff so I never got it.
That's exactly the point: your mum was right, your gran(s) were right, all your great-grans were right, etc, etc, all the way back to Mitochondrial Eve (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_Eve). None of them used sunflower oil all of them would have happily cooked with lard, very few of them (if any) had T2 diabetes. Go figure.
I found the smell of cooking with lard very evocative of my (long-gone) Grandmother's kitchen.
phoenix said:I doubt the Grannies round here used lard for cooking.That's exactly the point: your mum was right, your gran(s) were right, all your great-grans were right, etc, etc, all the way back to Mitochondrial Eve
They might, as they still do, use some duck fat and walnut oil,but for the most part it would be olive oil at least back to Roman times. They don't grow olives here but it isn't that far to transport it. They possibly used chestnut oil in the 18th to early 19C since chestnuts and rye were the staples.
Cretan grannies definitely used olive oil as did Italian grannies.
My granny would use lard for pastry, refined lard is fairly neutral in taste .
Cooking was done in dripping (beef) and the dripping pot used, added to and reused. It was clarified in hot water every now and then.
We had a dripping pot when we were first married but I've moved on. I'll stick to olive and the odd bit of duck fat from the confit for saute potatoes .
People round here eat a lot more fish here even though we're 100km from the sea. There's a lot more of it and a far bigger choice than in the UK It took time to adapt and get over my typically English food conservatism when faced with unknown fish but now we eat a lot more than we used to.
I don't know if the figures would be similar in the UK but the biggest cause in the huge rise of omega 6 intake in the US seems to have been from Soy oil.
You'd only eat a lot of that if you ate lot's of processed foods. http://www.ajcn.org/content/93/5/950.long
WhitbyJet said:Thoroughly depressed now - I use lard, ghee, butter and dripping for cooking and baking, but what am I to use for making my mayonnaise? I cant live without mayonnaise HELP
Defren said:borofergie said:[quote="xyz
Steve, I didn't know you were another of the redhead brigade on here, we seem to be a rather large group. :lol:
phoenix said:I doubt the Grannies round here used lard for cooking.
They might, as they still do, use some duck fat and walnut oil,but for the most part it would be olive oil at least back to Roman times. They don't grow olives here but it isn't that far to transport it. They possibly used chestnut oil in the 18th to early 19C since chestnuts and rye were the staples.
Cretan grannies definitely used olive oil as did Italian grannies.
Olive oil is a bit of a politically correct fad. It has it's origins of course in the supposed mediterranean diet - of which there are several, and of which only some had any olive oil in them. The support for olive oil was the general scheme (not supported by the evidence) that SFA is bad and MUFA and PUFAs were the alternative.
When you eat animal products and have low carbohydrate intake, you are getting huge amounts of MUFA from the animal fat - check out the MUFA content in a steak or in butter and it nearly matches the sat fat. Bone marrow is the big evolutionary source of MUFAs, not cold pressed olive oil. Of course there is some oxidation going on when you cook with olive oil that will defeat the purpose, so I eat it cold for flavor, but I get plenty of MUFA without olive oil in my animal based diet.
phoenix said:I don't know if the figures would be similar in the UK but the biggest cause in the huge rise of omega 6 intake in the US seems to have been from Soy oil.
You'd only eat a lot of that if you ate lot's of processed foods. http://www.ajcn.org/content/93/5/950.long
Unbeliever said:Defren said:borofergie said:[quote="xyz
Steve, I didn't know you were another of the redhead brigade on here, we seem to be a rather large group. :lol:
Yes , someon eshould do a study. Are redheads geneticlly more inclined to T2 diabetes? :lol:
Common racial ancestry would probably be Celtic or Viking. I know celts are supposed to have originated in the old ugoslavia region and of course we all knw {or think we do} about the Vikings I wonder what hat would tell us?
More looting, pillaging and raping nmight stave off the disease? It would certainly be good eercise!
How about these red heads for ancestors?And is the red hair gene a 'Celtic gene' – as is widely supposed? (Not really, but it is safe to say that – a few rare exceptions aside - all red heads are MC1R variants that derive from European populations; the prevalence of these alleles is highest in Celtic countrie
Grazer said:you could buy "Helmans paleo mayo"
If they made it.
lucylocket61 said:Another red-head xyzzy!!!!!
defren said:Steve, I didn't know you were another of the redhead brigade on here, we seem to be a rather large group
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?