• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

Not just my GP who tells new T2s don't bother testing!

It's a bit hard to generalize. I was diagnosed with T2 seven months ago, A1C 8.3% (67). Managed to control it entirely with a low-carb diet and exercise: two months after diagnosis A1C 5.5% (37), five months after diagnosis 4.9% (30). No self-testing at all, just those three A1C tests taken at the doctor's surgery. Soon, the testing interval is likely to be increased to six months.

I have no specialized medical knowledge but this regimen seems to make sense for me. I did lose 10KG in the few weeks after going on the diet and have kept all of that weight off (current BMI is 19). My only regular "self-monitoring" is to weigh myself every few days. I hope this will be a good "proxy" for how well I am managing my T2. If the weight starts creeping up again, I can adjust the diet. (It is already very low-carb, but I can always reduce the portions.)

I'm grateful that the testing is so occasional and non-intrusive, and full of admiration and empathy for those of you who have to do it a lot more often.
 
Last edited:
I was having none of that hocus pocus hoodoo voodoo chew leaves instead of deeply researched scientific medicine nonsense Butterfly.
Not my scene at all.
But then I started to research vaccines and other meds.
Western medicine is as good as totally toxic.
The medicines we get are to relieve not cure.
Many of them seriously suspect and many of them dangerous.
We're led to believe that western medicine is the best.
I no longer think like that.
Food as medicine has become part of my life and the way I approach my T2 and I'm having far better results than anyone else at my surgery who take the toxic route.
Honey garlic ginger herbs spices and so on are filled with very powerful substances.
I've come to the conclusion that the west has gone very very wrong in so many ways.
We are destroying our health by destroying peoples knowledge and contact with and of the natural world.
The natural world is you and me and everything else.
But our faulty education and information systems have now led the majority to see the natural world as being something over there. Something seperate from ourselves.
Something we encounter now and then.
Something we should save.
We see science as not the great destroyer but only as the great saviour.
One day our science will cure all ills comfort all needs entertain every desire.
It won't.
For all the wondrous things our science has achieved we still can't feed the world. There's more than enough food and money and we know what it is that needs to be done.
But will we do it?
No.
Stubbornly no.
Many put some kind of freedom argument forward that prevents us.
If we know a simple way to solve such a distressing and deadly problem but refuse to do it then our entire political religious scientific economic grandness is never ever going to fulfill it's potential.
The west has become a fully functioning materialistic dead end.
The west have abandoned the spirit of life for shiny things and comfort and to hell with the important things.
My advice?
Go hug a tree.
There'll be a nice one somewhere nearby.
Make the hug a long one.
Ask the tree a question.
Wait a while and see what starts to fill your mind.
That will tell you an awful lot.
Okay rant over.
 
In the early days ..my random meter-readings ranged between 6.2 → 23.8 mmol/L ..which justified all the aggro I had doing the home-tests.

Even if this was just a one-dimensional metric ..it was a ✻rain-check✻ ..and since I was using my own cash to buy the kit, and because this was about what was happening inside my own body ..it seemed an appropriate action to take at that time.

As my HbA1c has a reached a ✻steady-state✻ ..I have stopped using the glucometer for the time being.
 
Last edited:

Sorry I am a bit late to replying to this @Butterfly1960 ... This is useful stuff to take on board when I see my mate this weekend. I am going to ask the surgery for a printout of my results anyway, ahead of a review with the GP (and I think I will casually say I am happy to see any GP just to get a second opinion from someone at the surgery) and will take them over to show them how it has helped.

I have been quite interested in seeing how my carbs have gone down and if I do have a carby meal (last night I had my favourite Japanese Pancakes using 60g of spelt flour) and I hardly spiked and stayed nice, level and more important IN TARGET. So finally something is working, but I also try and have something immediately less carby the next day.

I am suffering a little though even on 2xMetformin SR - It jams me solid at least once a week... which can be... irritating, to say the least!
 

I m really glad that it has worked out well.for.you, but I think I have to disagree about the testing. Like you I have lost weight and now have a non diabetic hba1c. But to be honest for me this has always been about avoiding the complications of d. I really really dont want to.go blind. Not only is a continually raised hba1c an indication of continuing t2d, but so are spikes. I would have no way of knowing if some foods spike my bgl if I dont test.
I have no idea if having a relatively low hba1c can be achieved if you are having spikes as well. I suspect that it could be, if you keep your overall carb intake low, with just a few high spikes during the week. Does anyone know?

In any event, I have decided not to risk it. I might change my mind if there is evidence that occasional spikes make no difference to retinopathy. I dont think anyone really enjoys poking holes in thier fingers!
 
kokhongw said:
...besides close monitoring is rather expensive if financed by the health services...
Click to expand...

@kokhongw you have a valid point here. The NHS metrics are for the most part process metrics not outcome metrics. As individuals with this disease, we are interested in the best possible outcomes for ourselves as individuals, not the population level process metrics - e.g. "percentage of T2DM patients with HbA1c below 7.0%" - for which GP's are rewarded if they meet their QOF targets. Also, while GP's are very aware of the long term effects of poorly controlled diabetes, they work within a short-term budgetary cycle. They have to provide services for all patients during that time with their set budget at the same time meet their QOF quality metrics. The diabetes complications issue gets punted down the road because it is not here and now, staring the GP in the face, and for many with T2DM lifestyle changes and improvements take too long, and relapse may be frequent. GP's are penalized for poor process metrics, many of which are measured and reported quarterly. That is why the DM treatment is intensified at such frequent intervals if HbA1c targets are not being met. Take a look at the NICE treatment algorithm: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng...apy-in-adults-with-type-2-diabetes-2185604173

By incentivizing and rewarding process measures instead of outcome measures the end result is that an unfortunate concept is normalized within the medical profession and the general public, viz that Type 2 DM is a progressive disease, and that treatment escalation is normal and inevitable.

Those of us who actively manage our disease through self funding of our glucose monitoring strips and careful control are "co-producing" our health, and in doing so, we are increasing the capacity of the NHS by actively doing our part, and ensuring better long-term outcomes for ourselves (and the NHS budget). It is unfortunate that many individuals with Type2DM are not. There is hope however, with this wonderful website, and the burgeoning research into control and remission via dietary and lifestyle changes.
 

Interesting. My doctor said that the whole point of the HbA1C test is that it reports the level over a period of (about) three months, as opposed to a momentary glucose spike that might have coincided with the time of testing. I did see the eye doctor, and the foot doctor, and had a general medical-checkup, and there were no signs of diabetes complications at the time of diagnosis.

Is there any medical evidence that diabetes complications are possible even if HbA1C is below (say) 5.7% when tested every three months?

Kentoldlady1, well done for getting it under control!
 
Grateful said:
Is there any medical evidence that diabetes complications are possible even if HbA1C is below (say) 5.7% when tested every three months?
Click to expand...

Jenny Ruhl has collected a series of glucose related organ damage in this slightly dated, but still relevant blog
http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes/14045678.php
 
Grateful said:
My doctor said that the whole point of the HbA1C test is that it reports the level over a period of (about) three months, as opposed to a momentary glucose spike that might have coincided with the time of testing.
Click to expand...

@Grateful, the same could be said of the HbA1c - it measures the average glucose level over the past 2-3 months. So you have an average number, not a clear picture of the actual levels (both high and low) that got you that average. The following quote and link is to an article which describes this well. I found their graphs very useful:

'As Drs. Aaron Kowalski and Sanjoy Dutta described in 2013: “A mean speed of 55 mph over the past three months of commuting will never reflect times when a vehicle is racing at 100 mph and far in excess of the speed limit or is slowed to 10 mph in traffic congestion. Similarly, the clinician only receives the most basic of information from the HbA1c measurement and masks the occurrence and frequency of dangerous highs and lows.”' https://diatribe.org/BeyondA1c
​
The article makes the point that the HbA1c is a good process metric to measure how well a given GP or GP practice is doing in terms of how well their patients with diabetes are controlled. However, as individuals, we need more granular information so that we can achieve the best we can in terms of control. The HbA1c does not give us this level of detail, our meters do!
 

I thought the modern definition of T2 diabetes hinged on regular HbA1C tests. That particular test was only standardized quite recently (2009?). Is it not the case that people's daily/hourly glucose levels can go all over the place even if they are not diabetic?

Anyway, to each his/her own approach. I am lucky that the periodic A1C tests show that my T2 is under control. My doctor defines that as A1C below 7.0%; my actual figure has settled between 4.9% and 5.5% over time. In my case I do not see the benefit of self-testing. Until and unless the three-monthly figures worsen, the current regimen seems fine for me.

I am on a low-carb diet (below 30g/day), walking between 3 and 6 miles a day, and doing additional physiotherapy at home.

I do completely understand why some of us need daily monitoring but am not persuaded that it makes sense for me.
 
@Grateful,
Your results are stellar! Keep doing what you are doing; your hard work and dedication is clearly working really well for you!
 
Biggles2 said:
@Grateful,
Your results are stellar! Keep doing what you are doing; your hard work and dedication is clearly working really well for you!
Click to expand...

Thank you. I do feel relatively fortunate. The T2 is, for the time being, not much more than a "major inconvenience" especially as concerns my loved ones who have to live around the strict diet. Our current compromise is that my wife and I eat completely different meals at breakfast and lunch, but have the same supper (which is close to zero carb). As a result she has been slowly losing weight, which is something that she wanted to do anyway.

I am lucky that I don't seem to miss the starchy foods much. About the only time I "lapsed" was a couple of months ago when I tried my sister-in-law's famously scrumptious apple crumble. But strangely enough it tasted awful (unbelievably rich, in fact almost nauseatingly so).

I am one of those "thin T2s." I am 6'4" and the BMI is currently 19 (it was 22 at time of diagnosis at the start of this year). I am 60 years old. The challenge of course is to stay with the low-carb, moderate exercise routine for the rest of my life -- and to be prepared for a possible worsening of the T2, *if* the docs are correct about it usually being a progressive disease. When I first researched the complications of T2 I was horrified, but now I am much more relaxed: as long as I get regular checkups for the main suspects (eyes, feet, heart, etc.).

Perhaps my biggest motivation is to put off, for as long as possible, the stage when one starts taking lots of medicines (our elderly parents seem to be taking dozens of pills per day). So far, I am taking no medicines at all.

Bizarrely, the T2 diagnosis actually had a silver lining, because the things I have been doing to cope with it are very good things in their own right -- diet, exercise, making sure I get enough sleep, moderating the alcohol intake down to one glass of wine per day (edited to add: pre-diagnosis, it was 3 pints of beer and several glasses of wine). I'm a lazy SOB and frankly it was only because of the shock of the T2 diagnosis that I changed my ways -- I would never have done it otherwise.

I really appreciate the support from this forum, and also seeing how much support is being extended to hundreds of others with T2. Great stuff.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn More.…