@Seacrow please try visor for next time and let us know what happens ...Out of interest would they have accepted if you'd worn a visor?
Oh dear, I don't want to be a contributing factor for unnecessary stress/high blood pressure please!!@Seacrow please try visor for next time and let us know what happens ...
If you look on the government website it says it is not necessary to have a card stating you are exempt. If you feel the need to carry a card, a home made one is sufficient. If I was going to see the GP again I could really start to torment the receptionist.
For those worrying about receptionist morale, I remained calm, didn't raise my voice. I may have failed in keeping some frustration out of my voice, but so did she. I even thanked her profusely for being willing to find a work around. It's the bureaucracy gone mad.
Oh, and the government website also says a visor cannot be substituted for a face mask, although you are welcome to wear both if you want to.
I know the scenario described in the OP seems ludicrous, but the reading of patient records without either confirmed/written authorisation or a clear and urgent medical need is a breach of data protection, and could in certain circumstances lead to dismissal and/or a large personal fine.
I don't work in healthcare, but where I work breaching the rules on data protection can result in staff facing dismissal, personal fines of up to £10,000, and the business could be fined into the millions.
So however bizarre the apparent behaviour of the staff in question, they are actually doing their best to
- do their job as they are required to
- avoid risk of dismissal or a severe fine
- and probably find the situation 10x more irritating than you do, because they have to have these same repetitive, annoying conversations several times a day. Also, because they have to stay professional, they cannot express the frustration and impatience that the general public is free to do. Nor can they come onto a public forum and mock the public, as the public is free to mock them...
But as professionals then they should be aware that there is no such exemption card as the surgery (if anything like mine) will have refused to countenance providing them anyway.
The law about face coverings is fairly self evident and clearly states that people should not be questioned if they are claiming exemption. It has been in force since June last year so there really is no excuse for ignorance here.
Ahhh. I'm back again. Posting here I figure is better than howling at some poor receptionist.
So, my GPs surgery doesn't let you in unless you have an acceptable reason. No biggie, I mean I don't go to the GP for fun. They have a new camera/doorbell thing. The conversation goes like this:
Receptionist: you must wear a mask
Me: I'm exempt
R: can I see your official exemption card please
Me: there's no such thing
R: oh yes there is. Issued by the government, the lanyard with yellow flowers on.
Me: that's sold by a private, for profit company, and all you have to do to get one is pay
R: I'm sure they check your health
Me: no. My husband bought one for me. He gave them money and an address.
R: I need to see some form of proof.
Me: you are legally not allowed to ask for that.
R: wait please
Ten minutes later
R: I need to see something that shows you have medical conditions
Me: this is the doctors. You have my medical records.
R: we're not allowed to look through your medical records, patient confidentiality
R: but I can print them out for you
Me: and then you can read them
R: no, but I can give them to you
Me: uhhhhh
R: and then you can give them to me and tell me I can read them
We actually ended with her printing a piece of paper, handing it to me, and me handing it back for her to shred (because they don't keep patients private papers). I'm still speechless. At the time I didn't know whether to howl in aggravation or laugh myself silly.
Please note that my post you quoted was not discussing the wearing of masks, it was explaining the consequences of not complying with the UK rules on Data Protection.
However, if the member of staff has been given instructions by their line manager to follow certain procedures, then they will do so, as do most of us in our jobs. Yes, staff can question. Yes staff can roll their eyes and consider things to be unnecessary or different from how we/they would run things, if they/we ruled the world. But until those instructions change, expecting a receptionist to just rip up the rule book for where they work is unfair.
Far better for any patient who disagrees with surgery policy to write a letter to the office manager, rather than to argue the toss with the receptionist, who is simply following the instructions with which they are required to comply, and who will face consequences if they don't.
Do you have online access to your blood test results etc? I can book appointments online through the same link although there isn't the same amount of choice online as on the phone.Annnnnd here we go again. I have a phobia of telephones (well documented, due to events as a child), I can rarely use one.
Turning up at what shall now be known as Fortress Surgery, to find the rules have changed. Great! you may think. Not so.
1) You may only enter the surgery with a pre-existing appointment
2) Appointments must be made over the telephone
The sharp witted among you may see my problem.
3) Appointments may not be made over the intercom
4) Exceptions can only be made by a GP. At an appointment.
I see two ways out
1) I get my neighbours to phone for me after having explained the symptoms of a UTI that the receptionist will ask for
2) I write a letter to the practice manager asking for an appointment
Oh, and this is not just for COVID, this is for as long as 'they see the need'... I guess I should think myself lucky I'm not in serious pain or need.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?