- Messages
- 818
- Type of diabetes
- Gestational
- Treatment type
- Insulin
Before you read this, if you are easily triggered by food talk and will be tempted to eat something naughty, click away now.
I have quite a sweet tooth and am slowly getting used to not eating sweet things like I was. Going cold turkey for a month after a diagnosis of gestational diabetes has made it easier to appreciate the natural sweetness in vegetables and makes the naughty sweet things taste sickening, which I am happy about. But sometimes I just feel like making a low-carb nut cake, eg. hazelnuts, eggs and a tiny bit of sugar. I'm still confused about whether sugar, or honey is worse (sucrose vs fructose I guess?) for your blood glucose levels. I've only heard from the Diet Doctor spiels that fructose is stored only in the liver so if you have impaired fasting levels, fructose could well be worse than sucrose. Have I understood that correctly? Has anyone else read anything about it?
Anyway, I have been experimenting today doing my before and after readings when I am eating something with a small amount of added sugar. The hazelnut cake I made today had 4 teaspoons of sugar in total so if I ate two small pieces in a two hour period, I probably had a total of one teaspoon of sugar. My BG was very normal beforehand after eating only salad with a bit of meat and cheese so my before was only around 5.0 mmol. At one hour after the first portion of cake (with probably only 1/2 teaspn sugar), I was 5.6. So I had a second slice (told you, sweet tooth), and then an hour later I was still only around 5.3 mmol.
An hour and a half after eating salmon and 1/2 cup of rice, on the other hand, I was 6.2. And the other day a couple of hours after eating corn chips, dip and an almond milk with honey it in, I was 9.9 mmol.
So I'm just wondering, rice does seem a healthier option if you are going to have any carbs, but if a teaspoon of sugar here and there doesn't give you too much of a spike, do you continue consuming sugar in homemade goods? Would honey be better?
I recently tried Stevia in something and decided artificial sweeteners not only leave a bad after taste, but will more likely allow my sweet tooth habit to remain in full force as the tendency is to keep things as sweet as before. But really, that after taste, I'd rather have something natural in tiny proportions if I can do it.
I guess the last concern is, if sugar is what attaches to LDL cholesterol and causes it to stick in your arteries, is that a case for using honey or fruit as a sweetener and lean more towards fructose than sucrose if I'm going to treat myself to something a bit sweet?
I have quite a sweet tooth and am slowly getting used to not eating sweet things like I was. Going cold turkey for a month after a diagnosis of gestational diabetes has made it easier to appreciate the natural sweetness in vegetables and makes the naughty sweet things taste sickening, which I am happy about. But sometimes I just feel like making a low-carb nut cake, eg. hazelnuts, eggs and a tiny bit of sugar. I'm still confused about whether sugar, or honey is worse (sucrose vs fructose I guess?) for your blood glucose levels. I've only heard from the Diet Doctor spiels that fructose is stored only in the liver so if you have impaired fasting levels, fructose could well be worse than sucrose. Have I understood that correctly? Has anyone else read anything about it?
Anyway, I have been experimenting today doing my before and after readings when I am eating something with a small amount of added sugar. The hazelnut cake I made today had 4 teaspoons of sugar in total so if I ate two small pieces in a two hour period, I probably had a total of one teaspoon of sugar. My BG was very normal beforehand after eating only salad with a bit of meat and cheese so my before was only around 5.0 mmol. At one hour after the first portion of cake (with probably only 1/2 teaspn sugar), I was 5.6. So I had a second slice (told you, sweet tooth), and then an hour later I was still only around 5.3 mmol.
An hour and a half after eating salmon and 1/2 cup of rice, on the other hand, I was 6.2. And the other day a couple of hours after eating corn chips, dip and an almond milk with honey it in, I was 9.9 mmol.
So I'm just wondering, rice does seem a healthier option if you are going to have any carbs, but if a teaspoon of sugar here and there doesn't give you too much of a spike, do you continue consuming sugar in homemade goods? Would honey be better?
I recently tried Stevia in something and decided artificial sweeteners not only leave a bad after taste, but will more likely allow my sweet tooth habit to remain in full force as the tendency is to keep things as sweet as before. But really, that after taste, I'd rather have something natural in tiny proportions if I can do it.
I guess the last concern is, if sugar is what attaches to LDL cholesterol and causes it to stick in your arteries, is that a case for using honey or fruit as a sweetener and lean more towards fructose than sucrose if I'm going to treat myself to something a bit sweet?