Replace him with more of the same under a different banner?
Or waste a vote by voting for the greens?
.
It's a principled stance.I don't believe you can either complain or take the moral high ground if you choose not to vote. If, instead of that, you stood for election, for what you believe in, then I might have some respect.
Instead by choosing to do neither, you lose the right to complain about what we have, as you have done nothing to change it.
It's a very 70s punk view of the world.
Yes but then nobody bloody well votes and they get in again!If my political decision is there is n one I would vote for how can voting for someone I don't want to vote for be a more productive thing to do?
Deciding there is no one I can vote for is my vote at the moment.
I think people think that moving your legs in the direction of the polling booth is important and I have already said I will go and probably write none of the above.
A lot of people seem to be saying this country has to get rid of the Eton boys.
Everywhere I go and on other forums so the polls are not reflecting the real mood of the country by any means.
With rights come responsibilities! You can't have one without the other!It's a principled stance.
Everyone wants me to go against my principals.
I live in a country that has given me an incredible amount of freedom compared with many places in the world and I cherish that ... am very grateful that I was fortunate enough to be born in such a country.
Some of you it seems want to take freedom of choice from me.
My choice is probably more political than many who will turn out to vote just because.
And yes I can complain.
I can complain that what I'm being offered is a sham and won't change anything.
As I said before if voting changed anything then voting would be illegal.
If no one voted then we would have a constitutional crisis or some such thing and something would have to be done.Yes but then nobody bloody well votes and they get in again!
Anyone read /watched "Starship Troopers"?...With rights come responsibilities! You can't have one without the other!
If nobody voted, the incumbents would decide that they should stay in power.... Nothing would change. Except that the entire population would now be governed by a group of people they hadn't voted for. And thus an authoritarian state would be born.If no one voted then we would have a constitutional crisis or some such thing and something would have to be done.
Something would have to change.
The incumbents would have no mandate to govern and we would have a crisis.If nobody voted, the incumbents would decide that they should stay in power.... Nothing would change. Except that the entire population would now be governed by a group of people they hadn't voted for. And thus an authoritarian state would be born.
Sadly, your crisis depends on those that sit in the seats not voting for themselves, so is highly unlikely to occur. A parliament voted in with 600 votes is little different to one voted in with fewer than half the population voting.The incumbents would have no mandate to govern and we would have a crisis.
I think you are naive. Lovely, principled, rational but sadly theory and reality don't always match - I only wish we had more people with your integrity but we don't. It's an imperfect world and we have to make imperfect choices but I still think it's wrong not to vote.The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. - Eric Hoffer, The Passionate State of Mind, p 176, 1955
I would like to vote for, sceaming lord such and the monster raving looney party.Just before I hit the sack .... anyone want to own up to who they're voting for at the G.E.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?