Poor Doctors

Of course this has nothing to do with the fact that the doctors refused to play with the tories NHS reform plans. So they decided to change their pensions.

Not that I want to disagree with people and I know that not all doctors are great, but the majority of them had trained for 9-10 years to get where they are and they worked very very hard to be a doctor, this is 1 profession where I think they deserve what they should get. Nearly most of us rely and put a lot of trust in our doctors and in return they have a lot of responsibility to care and treat for us. I bet in most cases if a patient of some doctors die in their care and did all they could to prevent or increase lifespan they take it to heart and it affects them, how could it not?

Just my view....

I agree too, but only a small percentage actually striked, most doctors did not, that percentage is the "not so great Doctors I mentioned" but would you not be miffed on years and years of paying your contribution suddenly it was worthless? You would have been better of putting it under the mattress. If the pension fund was not raped by labour and money was not saved for a rainy day then this would not have been an issue. And yes everyone should be taking a small hit (even though that's not right) there are plenty of other ways the government could save millions if not billions, but they don't seem to care about those ways for some reason.

A good doctor is worth their weight in gold :thumbup:

We may have to agree to disagree then

we had a midwife appointment yesterday and all the doctors were in and all staff, only 2 of the doctors were striking and the others saw some patients, though most were cancelled from management and not the actual doctors, anyone who had a serious appointment were seen. My wifes best friend is a secretary there and said that the doctors spent they day working hard on all the other things they usually have to let slip because of patients appointments.

Having paid themselves into the the pot for years and having additional payments form the taxpayer for many years is fine with me for doctors, they have worked hard and missed out a lot in social life for training and hours worked, this reflected in them cutting some hours put in 2008 or 2004 I can't remember when that was. My surgery still does late night openings each week. if the doctors did not think they would be getting the payments when they retire, I bet all of them would be putting more money aside privately, but they are not because this is the contract they signed up for.

On other aspects of private jobs it is a different thing, bankers for instance we all think that is wrong, they do not appear to be worth earning there massive bonuses and pensions and payoffs. They are heading multinational million pouns companies all private, so why should they not get the money is also argued. This excludes the banks that currently have public funds propping them up, until ths money is repaid they should not get bonuses.

I find it strange that we want to cut GOOD pensions as being too much money instead of trying to raise BAD pensions to the same rate.

The doctors and government signed an agreement on pensions 4 years ago. Now the government are reneging on the deal. If the doctors say okay and give in, how long will it be before the government want to move the goal-posts again?

I personally, don't like the idea of doctors working longer. A surgeon is bound to be less steady over 60 than before. Would you like a 67 or 70 year old performing operations?

I don't begrudge highly trained individuals, who are expected to maintain their training from having a good wage - and one man's good wage is another man's riches. I think doctors deserve more money than - bankers say. As for 'us' paying for the doctors' pension - the more you earn the more tax you pay. If, as I used to do, paid £300 per month tax on your £6750 wage you're not paying a lot towards anyone's pension - including your own. 5% of a pittance is - a pittance :lol: . My brother who worked on computer programming at HSBC retired at 50 on over £1100 net pension paid more into the public workers pensions than I did - and got more out of it personally too.

Hey there!

Well, I don't defend doctors very often, but there's always an exception! People accept a job (any job) based on a set of terms and conditions - a contract that applies to both sides. To unilaterally change the T&Cs without agreement is simply wrong. It doesn't matter how much money is involved. It is simply wrong. As far as i'm concerned, the employer is in breach of contract and the strike action is justified. Doctors (and everyone else in this position) agree to take a certain set of duties/responsibilities for a certain remuneration package of which pension is a significant part. If the remuneration package is forcibly changed, they are entitled to withdraw their side of the contract - hence the strike. It doesn't matter whether we think they're worth the money, whether we are jealous of their income, pension etc or anything else - a contract is a contract and they have a right to expect it to be honoured. The politics of envy is a common tactic of governments when attacking employees terms and conditions. This is backed up by a very nasty and biased press in this country.

Smidge

They are certainly well paid but I could never do the job they do, apparently yesterday those who turned up for work but didn't treat patients were still paid £480 according to Radio 2 (average daily wage) so their industrial action didn't hit them hard in the pocket unlike most public sector workers, £100-125,000 a year a year salary is excellent money and the pension benefits are more than generous IMHO.

noblehead said:

They are certainly well paid but I could never do the job they do, apparently yesterday those who turned up for work but didn't treat patients were still paid £480 according to Radio 2 (average daily wage) so their industrial action didn't hit them hard in the pocket unlike most public sector workers, £100-125,000 a year a year salary is excellent money and the pension benefits are more than generous IMHO.

Click to expand...

As I mention previously the doctors that were striking still went to work and saw important patients, in the time they were not they were still working in all the other aspects of the job they were doing, it is only the patient aspect that was lacking. They have a lot of other jobs to do that do not involve direct patient involvement, they were still doing this.

BioHaZarD said:

As I mention previously the doctors that were striking still went to work and saw important patients, in the time they were not they were still working in all the other aspects of the job they were doing, it is only the patient aspect that was lacking. They have a lot of other jobs to do that do not involve direct patient involvement, they were still doing this.

Click to expand...

That's correct Bio they were saying as such on the Radio, I'd imagine a good proportion of a GP's working day will be taken up with paperwork and reviewing medical reports etc.

noblehead said:

BioHaZarD said:

As I mention previously the doctors that were striking still went to work and saw important patients, in the time they were not they were still working in all the other aspects of the job they were doing, it is only the patient aspect that was lacking. They have a lot of other jobs to do that do not involve direct patient involvement, they were still doing this.

Click to expand...

That's correct Bio they were saying as such on the Radio, I'd imagine a good proportion of a GP's working day will be taken up with paperwork and reviewing medical reports etc.

Click to expand...

I would suspect in a wierd way, they probably caught up a lot and may even have spent more time than usual going through records and updating themselves.

BioHaZarD said:

I agree too, but only a small percentage actually striked, most doctors did not, that percentage is the "not so great Doctors I mentioned" but would you not be miffed on years and years of paying your contribution suddenly it was worthless? You would have been better of putting it under the mattress. If the pension fund was not raped by labour and money was not saved for a rainy day then this would not have been an issue. And yes everyone should be taking a small hit (even though that's not right) there are plenty of other ways the government could save millions if not billions, but they don't seem to care about those ways for some reason.

Click to expand...

My gp's surgery did not go on strike yesterday, great I thought, but I couldn't get an appointment with my dr because he will not be in for the rest of the week so hopefully I will be able to make an appointment for Monday, as I do need to see him.

Our practice has 3 doctors to cover 2 surgeries and widely scattered rural home visits - I think I read somewhere that the area is 3500 square kilometers, and you can't cover it as the crow flies.

One GP is on holiday, another was at a parent's funeral - but the PCT wouldn't supply a locum because of the strike, which left one GP covering the whole lot! Okay, he was only covering urgent and emergency cases . . . I'd like to know how many hours he worked yesterday! I shall undoubtedly find out. Both our nurses were working, as were surgery staff - all their pensions have been tinkered with too!

I don't begrudge doctors a penny they're paid in wages - it's not only a wearying physical job, it has an emotional cost as well. I get a bit miffed about the fancy cars and the second homes etc - but they will pay tax on that pension, just as I do on my paltry state+private - under 10k a year and I'm still taxed on it :shock: After all, they're contributing to my housing benefit.

Viv 8)

viviennem said:

Our practice has 3 doctors to cover 2 surgeries and widely scattered rural home visits - I think I read somewhere that the area is 3500 square kilometers, and you can't cover it as the crow flies.

One GP is on holiday, another was at a parent's funeral - but the PCT wouldn't supply a locum because of the strike, which left one GP covering the whole lot! Okay, he was only covering urgent and emergency cases . . . I'd like to know how many hours he worked yesterday! I shall undoubtedly find out. Both our nurses were working, as were surgery staff - all their pensions have been tinkered with too!

I don't begrudge doctors a penny they're paid in wages - it's not only a wearying physical job, it has an emotional cost as well. I get a bit miffed about the fancy cars and the second homes etc - but they will pay tax on that pension, just as I do on my paltry state+private - under 10k a year and I'm still taxed on it :shock: After all, they're contributing to my housing benefit.

Viv 8)

Click to expand...

+1

Agree with Smidge and Minitata. No one should have the right to tear up an individuals contract of employment (public / private sector whatever) - what's the point of employees having a contract at all if this is allowed to happen.

And a junior doctor aged 23,working 45 years to the age of 68 and then recieving a pension of £68,000 P.A,well you have to take into account inflation and we're judging £68,000 in todays values and I imagine in the year 2057,£68,000 won't buy you as much as it would do today.