• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

"Pre-Diabetic" - 8000 Questions

bgup

Newbie
Messages
3
Type of diabetes
Prediabetes
Treatment type
Tablets (oral)
Hi, welcome to my novel.

Over the past...let's say decade, even, I've been in various states of less than exciting health. Tests were always at best inconclusive if not outright free of any alarms whatsoever, leading to a likely diagnosis of 'hypochondria'. It was also rather easy to assign "feeling lousy" to my **** diet and lack of exercise, which would improve sporadically here and there, often when I felt compelled to lose some weight for aesthetic purposes. The last time that happened was in August of last year, after climbing to a lifetime high of 235 lbs on a 6'3 frame. I was fat, and unhappy about it, and winnowed it down to a 215 lb plateau with some intermittent portion control and exercise. Unlike previous self-improvement phases though, I still felt lousy. I was also getting some worrisome heart-like symptoms...racing heart most usually. So, back to the doctor.

A battery of tests revealed three things. A mysteriously enlarged spleen (it did this before, and was eventually labelled "idiopathic"), a fatty liver, and a fasting blood glucose of 6.5. The latter was given to me as a passing point of interest. I asked if that was pre-diabetic, and was told "yup", and that was the end of that conversation. It was only after accidentally over-fasting for a follow up blood test and not feeling horrible that I looked into pre-diabetes a little harder, having always viewed it as a "You should be 10% less stupid" shot across the bow ho-hum medical warning, and lo and behold it appears "pre-diabetes" is "basically diabetes" and I'm on an express train to disaster. On my next trip to the doctor, I raised the question of the pre-diabetes, and asked whether I should be on Metformin. "That's a great idea". Alright then. Would've been capital if YOU had suggested it, but alright then.

Where I'm at over the last two-three weeks:

1. Down another 8 lbs to ~207. Have stuck at 207-208 for a couple of days, which is annoying me. My inflamed/tender abdomen seems to have settled down. I can now suck my stomach in and approximate a semi-flat torso, instead of simply sucking my gut in and making an anecdotally smaller gut. Huzzah.
2. Exercise changed from 50 minutes "when I feel like it" to 30 minutes a day six times a week no excuses. I'd say 6-7 times a week but that 7th time is still up for debate, I'm getting really knackered. Exercise is pure cardio thus far, it's what I have time for, heart rate between 120-150 for at least 25 of the 30 minutes.
3. Dramatically reduced portion sizes. All vice foods scuttled.
4. Over the last week, adopted the Low Carb High Fat diet bandied about here and elsewhere, dropping first under 100 carbs then under 50. I think. I'm reading labels, but vegetables do not come with labels. I'm avoiding starches and fruits like the plague. I did eat 5 strawberries the other day.
5. Metformin 250mg twice a day for the last week.

Where I was at before:

1. Classic **** western diet, probably worse than most, but not the sort of thing you'd see on a "You Won't Believe What This Man Eats" article. Lots of KD (for financial reasons, and I liked it). Lots of white bread. Lots of white rice. Lots of sugary iced tea. I know, I know. Shocking.
2. Exercise here and there, but it wasn't uncommon to go weeks or months without any. Sedentary work, sedentary hobbies.
3. Stress. Lots of stress. So much stress. A decade of stress. Sudden death of loved ones, constant financial crunches, health constantly in the air. Uh, I guess this one probably shouldn't be in the "before" section because it's not like I'm any less stressed post diagnosis. Very much more so, really.

Others things to know:

1. My father was pre-diabetic when he passed away at 56 (from an unrelated, or at best tangentially related ruptured aneurysm). He was moderately overweight, but surprising fit in spite of it.
2. No history of diabetes on my Mother's side.

So, questions. Answers to any and all would be appreciated.

1. The Metformin. It's making me nauseous. I was aware of this potentiality, but it's actually gotten worse over the week, and ideally I was to scale up to 500mg twice a day. I like the notion of what Metformin can do for me, so I'd like to stay on it, perhaps even long term. This nausea though. I take it with food, and the general result of that is I get nauseous after meals. Which...whee. How long until this settles down? How high a chance that it NEVER settles down?

2. The diet. I've been under 50g for about three days and it's freaking me out. I had an initial burst of well being (likely from giving my gut a break from nigh endless inflammation) but now I'm in a grey area of my body losing its gourd. How the hell does someone eat enough food on this diet? You can't just go ham on protein, that creates its own issues. No one can eat 1000 calories in vegetables without calamity ensuing. I can make up massive dietary shortfalls in fat without making myself dangerously nauseous, to say nothing of the mechanics of it. I'm confused by the carb restrictions on paleo/keto...why does a 200 lb man have virtually the same carb ceiling as a 100 lb woman? I need almost twice the energy of my partner for a daily caloric allotment, but we're supposed to eat the same amount of carbs? It's confounding. Additionally...energy. Exercising is getting hard, there's not a lot of pep in my legs. I'm sleepy as hell at night time. I imagine my blood sugar is lower (I can't imagine how it WOULDN'T be, switching from what I was eating to what I'm eating now), but is too low just as damaging as too high, or at the very least damaging in its own right? What does everyone snack on? Virtually everything "snacky" seems to be off limits, save possibly cheese, and it's hard to credit a "diet" where I'm eating half a block of cheese a day in a desperate race for satiety. Why the hard cut off lines? Is the only benefit to diabetics ketosis? Is a 29g diet full of benefits, but a 31g diet a wretched failure? Or is it just a rough guideline? Did I reduce carbs too fast? Is this just the "low carb flu"? Or am I eating starvation rations and trading one set of problems for another?

3. "Pre-diabetes". Is there any kind of scientific consensus on this? Opinions are all over the map. 10 minutes in the pre-diabetic sub forum and I can read from a man who "reversed it completely" while eating carbs just by doing crossfit, and from a guy saying you can literally never eat from restaurants or supermarkets again and if you look at a potato you'll die. Committing to a program of self-improvement is a lot easier when there are tangible goals, as opposed to "Hop on this grim treadmill, son, you'll be running on it forever", but if that's the reality, that's the reality. Long term I'd at LEAST like to be able to comfortably re-introduce fruits and starchy vegetables like carrots, it seems ludicrous to be eliminating them from a "healthy diet". To say nothing of the desire to eat a bun or a wrap and not be functionally stabbing myself in the heart with a dagger made of sugar. Possible? Not possible? Is diabetes/insulin resistance simply a continuum you get on at one point, and after you've passed Go the condition only worsens? Is it a binary situation, where you're sugars tolerant Y/N and it's only a question of how many complications you've unleashed? Or can you "rest" your system and actually enable some healing/recovery of prior function? This is not an entreaty to return to eating like a moron, by the way, I'm pretty stupid but I'm not THAT stupid. "Everyone is different", I know, but I'm curious.

4. Stress. How big a role does this play in blood sugar elevation? I took a "stress test" online with a friend and it came back as "dangerously stressed" with the sage advice of "try to avoid life crises", which was extraordinary. The diabetes and massive lifestyle overhaul haven't done much to improve that. Am I trading one inflammatory factor for another? And on that note...

5. Testing blood sugar. How essential is that, at this stage? I ask because simply the diet changes have created an uncomfortable level of financial crunch (produce and meat are expensive, processed kibble not so much), and I'm loathe to add to it buying hundreds of test strips so I can test my blood glucose 10 times a day unless there's an immediate, tangible benefit to doing so. If it's a question of "Not all carbs are terrible, you might be able to endure some, and the meter will tell you this", that's interesting. If it's "Keto or bust, diabetes boy" then shouldn't I just not eat carbs and assume the diet is doing what it's supposed to? Am I going to get interesting meter readings off the salmon I ate?

6. Not a question, but if I seem crazy, I had an emotional pining dream about a wholegrain bun last night. A wholegrain bun. I don't even like whole grain buns.
 
Hi @bgup,

I'm not going to answer all your points, as in most questions, you have answered them yourself.
I've tagged @daisy1 to give you the newcomers welcome information.

You do come over as intelligent enough to understand how your prediabetics can be controlled. What I will say is, take it slow, reduce carbs, reduce sugar, reduce your plate size, increase walking exercise.

Metformin, ask your doctor for the SR type (slow release). It will be easier on your stomach.

One of your issues is how and why prediabetics comes about.
It is insulin resistance, however it could be you have too much insulin in your blood, which is not good. It could be either or both.
They only test for blood glucose not insulin levels.

Have a read of the low carb forum and the success stories thread, to see how others have got in under control.

Welcome to the forum.
 
A very entertaining piece of writing, @bgup, it seems you are able to remain cheerful in the face of adversity - even stress - so that's a good start! It's obvious that you've learnt a few things already from your browsing around the site, and Daisy1 will add to that for you.

I don't know how essential it is for you to test at this stage - probably only you can decide that on the basis of how much detail control you want (or something similar) One thing I will share, though, is that I have found it invaluable to have my own meter so that I can figure out for myself those foods that cause me to spike and those that don't. The SD Codefree is used by a lot of folks, because the strips are the cheapest, and for me it has been a good investment. Cost of strips can be a bit of a stretch financially when you're on a pension, but once I have a good idea of the range of stuff I can eat, I plan to cut down drastically on the testing. At the mo I do a waking check, prior to food & 2 hrs after food, and with a few adjustments here and there I have seen my numbers come down gradually from 8s-10s, 8 weeks ago, to now regularly in the 5s and sometimes even 4s. I'm well pleased with that. You never know, you might find that you can learn to love that whole grain bun :D


p.s. I don't know yet whether I can return to eating bread and potatoes again, after "resting" my internal bits, but I would really really like to think that is possible. One thing for sure, I definitely do not want to move into being full diabetic . ......
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A very entertaining piece of writing, @bgup, it seems you are able to remain cheerful in the face of adversity - even stress - so that's a good start! It's obvious that you've learnt a few things already from your browsing around the site, and Daisy1 will add to that for you.

That came off as cheerful? My goodness. I don't know if I'm cheerful, necessarily. I guess I'm jokey. It's just how I express myself. Like most people, I'm a bit thrown for a loop. The initial stages of low carb dieting are really not fun. Dizzy spells, nausea from the Metformin, generalized weakness, fatigue, it's a treat. It's hard to not throw one's arms in the air and just eat an entire cake to spite the Gods.

I don't know how essential it is for you to test at this stage - probably only you can decide that on the basis of how much detail control you want (or something similar) One thing I will share, though, is that I have found it invaluable to have my own meter so that I can figure out for myself those foods that cause me to spike and those that don't. The SD Codefree is used by a lot of folks, because the strips are the cheapest, and for me it has been a good investment. Cost of strips can be a bit of a stretch financially when you're on a pension, but once I have a good idea of the range of stuff I can eat, I plan to cut down drastically on the testing.

That seems to be the primary use of the thing...to see what one can get away with. I'm trying not to eat any carbs that aren't green at the moment, and generally succeeding. Do I need to know if spinach is spiking my blood sugar? If it is, do I really want to know that? I'm a very data-centric person so I'd love to see the results, but I'm a very data-centric person so I'd love to see the results...constantly. And I'm not sure a constant influx of data regarding my blood sugar is particularly constructive or informative at this juncture. Maybe it is though. I dunno. It's all a mystery.

I'm not on a pension (I'm only 40) but money is tight. I have a dependent...two if you count the one that walks on four legs and meows a lot...and live in one of the more expensive cities in the world. So if I'm going to buy a glucometer...and I still might...I need a constructive plan for what to do with it.

At the mo I do a waking check, prior to food & 2 hrs after food, and with a few adjustments here and there I have seen my numbers come down gradually from 8s-10s, 8 weeks ago, to now regularly in the 5s and sometimes even 4s. I'm well pleased with that.

So what does 8-10 mean, in this context? I got one number...a fasting glucose test. It was the only "notable" number provided to me by the doctor, who to be honest I'm not sure I 100% trust to give me other relevant numbers. I don't know if that means other numbers were available and weren't alarming, or if she didn't test for them, or if one can divine further numbers from that single fasting glucose number.

I don't know yet whether I can return to eating bread and potatoes again, after "resting" my internal bits, but I would really really like to think that is possible. One thing for sure, I definitely do not want to move into being full diabetic . ......

The success people have had with the Newcastle diet, to say nothing of more modest gains made via the Mediterranean, Paleo or Ketogenic diets suggests that Insulin resistance can be reduced by simply "losing weight and exercising more", which would imply a higher degree of "safe carb consumption" without erratic blood sugar resulting. Whether that's true or me misunderstanding the science, I have no idea. I imagine the type of diabetes matters as well (if it's a result of your immune system deciding your pancreas is a mortal enemy you have a more complicated problem than if you're simply hedonistic and it's time for the party to stop). Mostly I want to know how we define these things and what the logic is. If you've shuffled over the medical threshold from "pre-diabetic" to "diabetic", which is often a matter of a few digits...why is one condition hypothetically "reversable" and the other incurable by any means? I would expect "decreased pancreatic function" to be the canary in the coal mine there, but shouldn't we have a means for determining that beyond simply watching someone eat with bated breath and waiting to see if they become rife with diabetic complications?
 
@bgup

Hello and welcome to the forum :) I hope this information which we give to new members will help to answer some of your questions, especially on diet. Ask more questions and members will flock along to help.


BASIC INFORMATION FOR NEWLY DIAGNOSED DIABETICS

Diabetes is the general term to describe people who have blood that is sweeter than normal. A number of different types of diabetes exist.

A diagnosis of diabetes tends to be a big shock for most of us. It’s far from the end of the world though and on this forum you’ll find over 150,000 people who are demonstrating this.

On the forum we have found that with the number of new people being diagnosed with diabetes each day, sometimes the NHS is not being able to give all the advice it would perhaps like to deliver - particularly with regards to people with type 2 diabetes.

The role of carbohydrate

Carbohydrates are a factor in diabetes because they ultimately break down into sugar (glucose) within our blood. We then need enough insulin to either convert the blood sugar into energy for our body, or to store the blood sugar as body fat.

If the amount of carbohydrate we take in is more than our body’s own (or injected) insulin can cope with, then our blood sugar will rise.

The bad news

Research indicates that raised blood sugar levels over a period of years can lead to organ damage, commonly referred to as diabetic complications.

The good news

People on the forum here have shown that there is plenty of opportunity to keep blood sugar levels from going too high. It’s a daily task but it’s within our reach and it’s well worth the effort.

Controlling your carbs

The info below is primarily aimed at people with type 2 diabetes, however, it may also be of benefit for other types of diabetes as well.
There are two approaches to controlling your carbs:

  • Reduce your carbohydrate intake
  • Choose ‘better’ carbohydrates

Reduce your carbohydrates

A large number of people on this forum have chosen to reduce the amount of carbohydrates they eat as they have found this to be an effective way of improving (lowering) their blood sugar levels.

The carbohydrates which tend to have the most pronounced effect on blood sugar levels tend to be starchy carbohydrates such as rice, pasta, bread, potatoes and similar root vegetables, flour based products (pastry, cakes, biscuits, battered food etc) and certain fruits.

Choosing better carbohydrates

Another option is to replace ‘white carbohydrates’ (such as white bread, white rice, white flour etc) with whole grain varieties. The idea behind having whole grain varieties is that the carbohydrates get broken down slower than the white varieties –and these are said to have a lower glycaemic index.
http://www.diabetes.co.uk/food/diabetes-and-whole-grains.html

The low glycaemic index diet is often favoured by healthcare professionals but some people with diabetes find that low GI does not help their blood sugar enough and may wish to cut out these foods altogether.

Read more on carbohydrates and diabetes

LOW CARB PROGRAM:
http://www.diabetes.co.uk/low carb program


Eating what works for you

Different people respond differently to different types of food. What works for one person may not work so well for another. The best way to see which foods are working for you is to test your blood sugar with a glucose meter.

To be able to see what effect a particular type of food or meal has on your blood sugar is to do a test before the meal and then test after the meal. A test 2 hours after the meal gives a good idea of how your body has reacted to the meal.

The blood sugar ranges recommended by NICE are as follows:

Blood glucose ranges for type 2 diabetes
  • Before meals: 4 to 7 mmol/l
  • 2 hours after meals: under 8.5 mmol/l
Blood glucose ranges for type 1 diabetes (adults)
  • Before meals: 4 to 7 mmol/l
  • 2 hours after meals: under 9 mmol/l
Blood glucose ranges for type 1 diabetes (children)
  • Before meals: 4 to 8 mmol/l
  • 2 hours after meals: under 10 mmol/l
However, those that are able to, may wish to keep blood sugar levels below the NICE after meal targets.

Access to blood glucose test strips

The NICE guidelines suggest that people newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes should be offered:

  • structured education to every person and/or their carer at and around the time of diagnosis, with annual reinforcement and review
  • self-monitoring of plasma glucose to a person newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes only as an integral part of his or her self-management education

Therefore both structured education and self-monitoring of blood glucose should be offered to people with type 2 diabetes. Read more on getting access to bloodglucose testing supplies.

You may also be interested to read questions to ask at a diabetic clinic

Note: This post has been edited from Sue/Ken's post to include up to date information.
 
I am no expert and can only say what worked for me. I now have normal BS levels and am 30pounds down in weight.
Exercise: still working like mad on that one six days per week. I was advised to do cv stuff AND weights as the positive effects from the latter last while I have an easier day
Spinach: yes you do need to know if it spikes your BS . Initially I had no idea at all what spiked mine and it was a revelation to find out what did. It was only by religiously testing that I have been able to determine what is ok for me (or not as the case may be.) I follow the LCHF diet which has been a revelation to me as I had low fat for years (gallstones) and continued by choice post cholecystectomy.
If it's any help I no longer have food cravings, I am running regularly, feel less stressed, am more alert, no longer feel lethargic at all and know that the hard work has all been worth it. And it IS hard work, don't let anyone kid you. You will have good days and bad days, you will meet a mixture of helpful, supportive or misinformed and condescending health professionals ( I say that as an ex health professional myself!)and most importantly get so much help from these forums. I have been so impressed by the knowledge of fellow posters and also the spirit in which advice is so freely given. You CAN succeed.
 
So what does 8-10 mean, in this context? I got one number...a fasting glucose test. It was the only "notable" number provided to me by the doctor, who to be honest I'm not sure I 100% trust to give me other relevant numbers. I don't know if that means other numbers were available and weren't alarming, or if she didn't test for them, or if one can divine further numbers from that single fasting glucose number.

Hello again, @bgup

Well, seems you weren't joking about the 8000 questions ! Sorry about not explaining this comment better. The numbers I'm talking about here are the day-to-day blood glucose levels that I get from my home-based tests. Daisy1 has included the NICE recommendations in her post, and from memory I think there is other info in some of the links that she gives. Your GP is not likely to mention details about these levels because they usually do the HbA1c, which is a 3-month average, though I've read that it concentrates on the most recent 4-6 weeks. I haven't figured out yet just how the 2 sets of numbers interrelate, but I'm working on the basis that if I can get the daily figures down, that must influence the outcome for the next HbA1c - and how I am recorded by the medicos.

We'd all like definitive answers, to a whole range of issues, but till those come along we're stuck with doing the best we can.
 
Back
Top