Both provide useful data. Neither is a definitive marker of metabolic health. This is because they only tell you what is, or has been in, the blood - not in the entire body - an important distinction to understand if using oral hypoglycaemics or exogenous insulin as treatment.
HbA1c is, in my view, inadequate on its own because it doesn’t tell you how your body reacts to individual meals and/or pharmaceutical drugs. It won’t provide any data on hyperglycaemia or hypoglycaemia events, only an average.
which would you accept.
I'd forgotten I'd asked before. What concerns me is that you could have several meals in a day - all giving an acceptable reading, but from a glycemic loading point of view (i.e. the more you eat) this could drastically affect HbA1c.@Priam , I notice that you asked a very similar question last September. Can I ask what’s worrying you about the two different tests?
I keep to the same number of meals and snacks each day always totally under 50g of carbs a day. That keeps my blood sugars stable and therefore my HbA1c stays stable too.I'd forgotten I'd asked before. What concerns me is that you could have several meals in a day - all giving an acceptable reading, but from a glycemic loading point of view (i.e. the more you eat) this could drastically affect HbA1c.
Don't forget that Hba1c can be inaccurate (either high or low) if you have one of a number of metabolic peculiarities
https://www.goodrx.com/blog/could-your-hba1c-diabetes-test-be-wrong/
Sorry about that. I'm in New Zealand so am not sure why I can view it?Thank you for the link. Unfortunately it seems that the info is only available to U.S. citizens.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?