SunnyExpat
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,230
- Type of diabetes
- Prefer not to say
- Treatment type
- Tablets (oral)
Liposuction?
I'm getting very confused to be honest.
That is because you are missing the point. As usual.
And please don't ask me to explain.
The information is already clearly presented on this thread (and many others), for those willing to see it.
Liposuction?!Liposuction?
I'm getting very confused to be honest.
Season's Greetings to you and your pancreas then.It'll be fine.
I know it as if it's a part of me.
But I doubt my pancreas ever read anything about the eatwell plate. It just did stuff that pancreas do.
And now it still does stuff, but it's still not clued up on eatwell plates.
Season's Greetings to you and your pancreas then.
Enjoy and be well.
I won't increase weight beyond my 'remission' level.
SXplat - I have abridged your previous post, but only because I only address one specific point.
How do you know what your "remission level" was? Did something magical happen, whereby you knew you had actually achieved something? And secondly, how do you know that your "remission level" remains the same over time? There is some suggestion that over time our bodies may function less efficiently than in their prime, as is evidenced by many older people having increasing HbA1c scores over time. Of course, some of that increase could be due to "modernising" their diet, to include more processed foods, but that's also adding a veneer of my own speculation.
So, how is a normal BG level in "range" linked with with the knowledge that you have lost enough weight ? Do you think overweight people don't experience BG levels in range ? Or any other levels actually. You've said you "won't increase weight beyond remission level" then explain you know this level according to your BG levels ? Makes no sense whatsoever.Andblow
It's quote simple really.
If you check your BG level, and it's within the normal range, you're below the level.
Beyond that, I'm sure it becomes over complicated.
Andblow
It's quote simple really.
If you check your BG level, and it's within the normal range, you're below the level.
Beyond that, I'm sure it becomes over complicated.
That's the difference in viewpoint.
If I was to be a portfolio person.
I would carefully label all my 'work'.
I would carefully collect it into the portfolio,.
I would label the portfolio.
I would spend my time presenting my portfolio.
I would compare my portfolio to other peoples portfolio.
I'd wonder why other people don't want a portfolio like mine.
But I'm not, I'm a diabetic, so I tend just to view as something I can get on in life with by losing weight because that works for me.
You either misunderstand, or misinterpret my meaning of portfolio. By portfolio, I mean there are many factors involved, with some commonalities. That's what facilitates the scenario whereby not all overweight folks are diabetic, nor do all diabetics have lipid issues (although, as we know, many do), nor do all those with raised glucose profiles, have hypertension. We can have a handful or a Fistful of markers for diabetes, with the common factor we trigger the diabetic diagnostic criteria.
I don't see life in as binary, or monochrome terms as you do, but I'm content with that.
I remember the first time I had a drink tooI tend to take a helicopter view, but I do find diabetes is easier if you get all your ducks in a row, and take the low hanging fruit first.
You should always look under the bonnet, and I find this forum is an excellent place to cascade relevant information.
And it is interesting to sometimes put on the record and see who dances.
But, above all, sometimes though, you need to realise you haven't enough bandwidth, then you need to revisit your personal strategic staircase.
I remember the first time I had a drink too