Everything follows the money in the end.
Hi Everyone
Dr Michael Gregor was in London this April and gave a talk to the college of Naturopathic medicine. He discusses diabetes around 40 minutes, but the whole talk is very interesting
Sue
I tried to access the second link but seem to be locked out of the US Microsoft login process. The video link I found very difficult to follow - the slides behind the presenter were impossible to follow and were very distracting. Do you have access to the slide data without the presenter? There seems to be very little cross reference to any scientific sources to back up what the presenter was saying. I gave up before the 40 mins was up, so did not see what the presenter had to say about diabetes.
If you pull the button along the bottom of the video you should be able to get it to 40 mins easily, no need to watch the whole thing if you don't want to. As for as the other links go, just put in the www. follows by the site into your browser.
Sue
plump/very slim.... in the eye of the beholder. Not too crazy about very slim myself.Thank you everyone for replying! I am not related to the fine Dr M G, who is he? I have read the China Study more than once! Denise Minger has changed her tune somewhat since she wrote the Critique of it. I consider the China Study to be a very good book and Colin Campbell to be an open and honest man. I have heard him speak in person.
I am 62 and have had a whole food plant based diet for nearly 6 years. It has been the best thing I have every done for my health. My BMI is 18.5, blood pressure 103/64, cholesterol 4. I have an under active thyroid.
By whole food plant based I mean. Nothing from an animal, no processed food, no added fat/oils, no added sugar, plenty of complex carbs (this is where the bulk of your calories will come from), so brown rice, wholemeal bread, wholemeal pasta, sweet potatoes, normal potatoes, millet. You can eat as much as you want to fill you up (I am thin but I eat a lot, believe me). This way of eating is not about reducing calories or starving yourself. When I began I did not think I would lose weight, I was eating so much, but I did.
It would be interesting to see how people fared on LCHF long term. If you eat like this how long have you been doing it? I know people who have been eating WFPB for many years who are in fine health and look likely to continue so. Many have reversed serious diseases lots of info on the www.drmcdougall.com site and forum.
I wish you all well, I just wanted to give some information about Whole Food plant based, because I am sure there are many people who would find it beneficial.
All the experts who espouse the 'Atkins' type diet look plump to me and all the Drs who espouse the Whole Food Plant based are very slim (Drs John McDougall, Craig McDougall, Caldwell Essylsteyn, T Colin Campbell, Tom Campbell, Neal Barnard, Joel Kahn, Baxter Montgomery, Michael Klaper there are lots more).
Best wishes, Sue
plump/very slim.... in the eye of the beholder. Not too crazy about very slim myself.
BMI has issues, 18.5 could be anything without a height to go with it.
I started LCHF 30 months ago, lost a load of weight, brought my BP and BG under control. I currently eat like a horse, trough by trough and still struggle to keep to my weight.
It works for me.
I'm not evangelical about it though.
Each to their own.
Agree, just looked up the table and the ranges, yellow and all are the BMI number and height has nothing to do with... brain fail here.I thought BMI was weight over height squared?
WFPB is a way of eating that gives ethical veganism a bad name in the low carb diabetes community. Hope that helpsSlightly off-topic here but can someone please explain the difference between veganism and WFPB? Is there a difference or is this yet another acronym to make things sound more scientific?
Veganism has arguably been around since 600BC and it's known health benefits have been shown for many, many years. However, in all that time it has never professed to be a cure-all for illnesses and disease. It has argued that the avoidance of meat, dairy and animal products is both ethically justified and nutritionally sound.
If WFPB is the same as veganism can we get away from pointless acronyms that are little more than "dietspeak" and confuse those seeking help.
And, if it is the same then I find it interesting that no recognised vegan organisations have latched onto the notion that the lifestyle can "cure" diabetes. Is it because the science proposing such a notion is flawed?
Slightly off-topic here but can someone please explain the difference between veganism and WFPB? Is there a difference or is this yet another acronym to make things sound more scientific?
Veganism has arguably been around since 600BC and it's known health benefits have been shown for many, many years. However, in all that time it has never professed to be a cure-all for illnesses and disease. It has argued that the avoidance of meat, dairy and animal products is both ethically justified and nutritionally sound.
If WFPB is the same as veganism can we get away from pointless acronyms that are little more than "dietspeak" and confuse those seeking help.
And, if it is the same then I find it interesting that no recognised vegan organisations have latched onto the notion that the lifestyle can "cure" diabetes. Is it because the science proposing such a notion is flawed?
plump/very slim.... in the eye of the beholder. Not too crazy about very slim myself.
BMI has issues, 18.5 could be anything without a height to go with it.
I started LCHF 30 months ago, lost a load of weight, brought my BP and BG under control. I currently eat like a horse, trough by trough and still struggle to keep to my weight.
It works for me.
I'm not evangelical about it though.
Each to their own.
A whole foods plant based (WFPB) diet is based on whole or minimally processed whole grains, legumes, vegetables and fruits. It excludes animal-based foods, including fish and dairy, and also highly processed foods such as oils (that means no olive oil or coconut oil)Slightly off-topic here but can someone please explain the difference between veganism and WFPB? Is there a difference or is this yet another acronym to make things sound more scientific?
Veganism has arguably been around since 600BC and it's known health benefits have been shown for many, many years. However, in all that time it has never professed to be a cure-all for illnesses and disease. It has argued that the avoidance of meat, dairy and animal products is both ethically justified and nutritionally sound.
If WFPB is the same as veganism can we get away from pointless acronyms that are little more than "dietspeak" and confuse those seeking help.
And, if it is the same then I find it interesting that no recognised vegan organisations have latched onto the notion that the lifestyle can "cure" diabetes. Is it because the science proposing such a notion is flawed?
Presactly! The insulin/glucose response of metabolically damaged people cannot possibly be compared to metabolically healthy people. It's a pointless exercise.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?