Obviously, cardiologists will be a bit shaken and confused as will most dieticians and a lot of other medical staff.
The 76 studies that were reviewed, with all the 550 000 observed people (49 studies) and the 103 000 individuals in randomised, controlled studies (27) aren't enough, we need more studies, don't we?
All these studies confirming there isn't anything sinister with saturated fat can´t be enough, can it?
Abstract: http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=1846638&resultClick=3
Didn't Eddie the Eagle Edwards want to practice skiing down the butter mountains
As the article from the BHF says more research is needed:
https://www.bhf.org.uk/media/news-from-the-bhf/fats-in-your-diet.aspx
Personally, I now freely eat saturaturated fats, butter, full cream, fry my eggs in bacon fats, have meats with fat in them - and am doing fine.
The clever people out there say (in another forum and in several scientific articles) , that if you ratio is below 2.0 (triglyceride number divided by your HDL), you are doing fine - no reason to overly worry then about cardiac problems. But of course your way may vary - only telling what my take on this is ...
I will admit that it was with some trepidation I took this course - the fat-scare had been along all my life. - But when after three months after having - somewhat worried - adopted this LC/HF way of eating, suddenly all my cholesterol/lipid numbers (bad until then) were to dream about.
Annelise
(T2, latest HbA1C at 5.7 - still no meds) (Denmark)
- and my grandmother who lived to 105 would always pick the fattest pieces from the Sunday steak ...
Hi, I was the same with cholesterol changing to LC/HF improved my lipids and ratios, triglycerides/HDL ratio 0.570
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?