desidiabulum
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 709
Dear All,
I haven't been on the forum for some years now, basically because all has been going fine. Weight, bloods, hba1c all OK. Diabetes clinic and my GP are now pushing strongly for me to go on to semaglutide. I am resisting because I am on so many drugs already (dapagliflozine, atorvastatin, lisinopril, bisoprolol, aspirin, gliclazide, B12 injections etc) and I feel I have the right sort of balance and I definitely don't need to lose weight. Gastrointestinal issues are my Achilles heel (I still have nightmares about my brief initial use of metformin) and I don't relish the possibility of having these exacerbated by new medication (also the muscle wastage, need to boost protein levels etc). The arguments I get back is that gliclazide is 'old-fashioned' (!) whereas semaglutide would be good for my heart etc. My instinct is that if a drug interferes so much with how the body functions it is only going to be a matter of years before long-term side effects are identified. I know I am lucky to be offered it, and I have been lucky to have mostly supportive healthcare professionals, but my instinct is 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it'. What do other people think?
I haven't been on the forum for some years now, basically because all has been going fine. Weight, bloods, hba1c all OK. Diabetes clinic and my GP are now pushing strongly for me to go on to semaglutide. I am resisting because I am on so many drugs already (dapagliflozine, atorvastatin, lisinopril, bisoprolol, aspirin, gliclazide, B12 injections etc) and I feel I have the right sort of balance and I definitely don't need to lose weight. Gastrointestinal issues are my Achilles heel (I still have nightmares about my brief initial use of metformin) and I don't relish the possibility of having these exacerbated by new medication (also the muscle wastage, need to boost protein levels etc). The arguments I get back is that gliclazide is 'old-fashioned' (!) whereas semaglutide would be good for my heart etc. My instinct is that if a drug interferes so much with how the body functions it is only going to be a matter of years before long-term side effects are identified. I know I am lucky to be offered it, and I have been lucky to have mostly supportive healthcare professionals, but my instinct is 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it'. What do other people think?