If you scroll down a little on that website, you'll see the HDL/Trig calculator, it's just below the Insulin Resistance Calculator but the HDL/Trig ratio is in itself an indicator of insulin resistance - at least that's my understanding of it - but not an expert by any means - am still very new to all this - and aware that there are many more knowledgeable folk in this forum.
Hmmm......
https://www.escardio.org/Journals/E...io-as-surrogate-marker-for-insulin-resistance
Hadn't come across this before.
"Triglyceride (TG) to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) ratio values >2.75 in men and >1.65 in women were found in the Metabolic Syndrome in Active Subjects (MESYAS) study -18,778 active workers enrolled in 3 insurance companies in Spain- to be highly predictive of the metabolic syndrome (MS) diagnosis. TG/HDL ratio was also found to have a high predictive value of a first coronary event regardless of body mass index (BMI)."
Last results (last year):
Tgl 1.18 mmol/L
HDL 1.96 mmol/L
I would like to see an online calculator for this which directly relates the ratio to incidence of IR.
I'm not 100% sure quite how the ratio is calculated but with my two numbers it looks hard to get a ratio of >2.75 whichever you divide by whatever.
The site linked to earlier
https://www.thebloodcode.com/calculators/
gives me a ratio of 1.4 after converting units.
Slightly confused by the conversion from mmol/L to mg/dL because it is a different factor for the two readings.
I assume that this has something to do with different molecular weights when you are converting from volume to weight?
As far as I can see there are two discreet calculations on the "bloodcode" site; one for IR and the other for heart disease risk.
Although there is some suggestion from other research (as in the top link) that a high ratio of trigs to HDL might be associated with Metabolic Syndrome, there is no apparent information on people with IR and a low ratio (which I think applies to me). I suppose I may fall into the marginal area beyond "high correlation".
I would be surprised if I have no IR, especially after that private test I had a couple of years back.
I do note the article talks about high insulin and high glucose circulating in the blood.
My test showed low normal insulin but slightly elevated BG, which implies that the insulin is not fully effective, but does not match the usual "high everything".
One positive thing to take away is that my ratios don't indicate a high risk of a cardio event.