actually you are slightly mistaken with the analogy of lucozade being a wimp's drinkYou guys with the hypo's. You are using the wrong stuff: Lucozade is a wimp's drink
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-35831125
As a type 1 with 55years + experience, I rely on original Lucozade for the more serious hypos, and very occasionally, it has been the difference between recovery and going into a coma. I keep 350ml bottles in strategic places like our kitchen, by the bed and in the car. As everyone knows, you can get lucozade into yourself (as long as you are concious) so much quicker than munching Dextose tablets. My concern, is not so much about a possible price increase (as I don't use lots) but that the manufacturer might reduce the sugar in the product. I will write to the manufacturer, and I urge anyone concerned to do the same.
As an aside; do any who use Lucozade wish there was a see-through strip down the side of the plastic bottle to give an idea of how much you are gulping?
Yay!I still find myself curious as to what the government defines as a fruit juice and what they define as a soft drink and what they do with stuff in between (Entirely from an intellectual standpoint) not trying to be argumentative or anything, just curious!
I'll probably look it up later for the sake of knowing
Yes, that worried me too. I heard on the news that manufacturers are being encouraged to reduce sugar in drinks. Worrying for quick hypo treatments.
Also, although my children rarely have fizzy drinks, I'd rather they had sugar than artificial sweeteners.
I hope manufacturers continue to make proper sugary drinks as well as lower/no sugar ones. I'd like a choice.
Im not in favour of the sugar tax, I often need 2 sips of Lucozade to get rid of a hypo, mind you, a few pence on top of a bottle doesnt bother me. Sugar in water doesn't do the trick because it could be too far to walk to the kitchen, and then it has to dissolve. Fruit juice doesn't work quickly enough for me - very insulin sensitive and long term type 1 (46 years) on really low doses but often hypo.
Yes, that worried me too. I heard on the news that manufacturers are being encouraged to reduce sugar in drinks. Worrying for quick hypo treatments.
Also, although my children rarely have fizzy drinks, I'd rather they had sugar than artificial sweeteners.
I hope manufacturers continue to make proper sugary drinks as well as lower/no sugar ones. I'd like a choice.
If worried about what to take when having a hypo, stick with a 200ml small carton of Orange Juice (or other types of fruit) from concentrate, as these only have natural sugars and contain 20g of Carbohydrate in each 200ml carton, regardless of manufacturer or supermarket, less calories than Lucozade, cheaper to, and plenty of other alternatives. If blood sugar has dropped to 2mmol/ml one carton will bring you safely back up, then you can take some slower released carbohydrate item to stop it dropping back again. Many Diabetic Clinics now don't advise these products as the sugar content has been reduced with no warning, unless you check each bottle. Same goes for many a Diet drinks, whatever you use though check the sugar content, whether natural like fruit juices, or otherwise, be safe out there.
Please also remember if driving and on Insulin you must have a minimum blood glucose reading now of 5mmol/ml to legally drive and most clinics say not below 5.5. Don't loose your licence over this, and do frequent stops on a long journey to check and have things in the car to bring it back up. The guideline is not to drive for 40 minutes after hypo, as long as back above the 5 level.
Yep, dietary pleasure trap. Same reward circuit as any drug.People will pay if they really want sugary drinks.
Talking of dietary pleasure traps.. How are you?Yep, dietary pleasure trap. Same reward circuit as any drug.
I guess it more just limits our options in regards to what is affordable as a part of that kit. Fruit juice isn't taxed so juice is still fine and so are a number of other sugary alternatives. I am in full support of where the money is going, but at the same time I'm a little bummed that the drinks are going up in price. (Not in the least because I'm sure the drinks companies will hike the prices of their diet beverages to match the sugared equivalent with tax applied.)
I am wondering about things like Jam, which is the must sugary product you can get. Fruit sugar we are told, is used in a different way by the body, than refined white sugar. Not sure how true this is. Honey seems to be a bit different as well, seemingly because it is digested in a different manner. Does any one have a high reading after ingesting a bit of honey? I am going to try taking readings to check if honey affect me or not. We are told that we are all different in our metabolic behaviour, and also that for various reasons it can change from time to time. For instance mashed potatoes are absolutely deadly for me, but a bit of bread and honey with cream, I can get away with! Perhaps if the honey theory was correct, manufacturers of sweet goods could use this to replace the refined sugar. Does anyone agree?
To be perfectly honest I cannot see that tax making much difference, Haribo's contain more sugar per packet than 3 bottles of full fat coke as I call it. It is the culture that has to change kids playing out Parents not buying the kids expensive clothes that can get dirty when they are playing out/ buying them mobiles that does everything they want so they just sit there. All sugar can be burned off with a good level of exercise. People say that deprived arias are the worst but I have to disagree where you live makes no difference get out play out and have fun is the answerWatching George Osborne at the moment, he's bringing in a sugar tax on the soft drinks industry. This should be interesting..
It's a start, sadly I wont be around to see if it works as desired, assuming it'll take decades to see any long term effects. What about the low fat stuff with added sugar to improve the taste? Can't have everything I suppose.Watching George Osborne at the moment, he's bringing in a sugar tax on the soft drinks industry. This should be interesting..
I guess it more just limits our options in regards to what is affordable as a part of that kit. Fruit juice isn't taxed so juice is still fine and so are a number of other sugary alternatives. I am in full support of where the money is going, but at the same time I'm a little bummed that the drinks are going up in price. (Not in the least because I'm sure the drinks companies will hike the prices of their diet beverages to match the sugared equivalent with tax applied.)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?