If it is a 39 then welcome to the 5% Club Acorn.phoenix said:Could the figure given have been 39?
acron^ said:Still no luck.
Those guidelines say that results will be reported in both formats (% and mmol/mol) but the people at new GPs must be total retards. For a start, I had to drag the number out of them. The second time I rang, the receptionist said "No cause for concern." and when I asked for the exact value she said "I can't give that out - I'm not medically trained!" For the love of God. I finally coaxed her into it and she said it says 3.9, definitely not 39. And there's no sign of any measurements, percentage or otherwise. Just 3.9. How very useful.
I am mightily ****** off.
hanadr said:They have just recently changed the method of reporting Hb A1c, but it's not in percentages. I read about it in "Balance" but I can't remember the details. I'm sure it said that the results would be iven in BOTH formats. I agree 3.9% does seem a bit unlikely. Average for non-diabetics is about 5.1% and not even the most strict low BG advice would get you to 3.9%. I'll look up har average BG it conforms with
The lowest reading that I've ever come across! I'd make an appointment to see your GP.acron^ said:Well, since this post made the newsletter i thought I'd update you guys!
I had another HbA1c done on Monday and the results............
3.8% !!!
Me: "WHAT?!"
Receptionist: "The system says 3.6 to 6.8 is 'safe' so you're within the normal range. No action required".
Am I diabetic?! I'm starting to wonder??? I have an appt. with DN in 2 weeks so we'll get to the bottom of this.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?