jay hay-char
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,683
- Type of diabetes
- Type 2
- Treatment type
- Diet only
I expect they probably did, and sorry if I sound a bit intolerant but I didn't really go on the course to hear about someone else's cornsMaybe the 'old codgers' who may not surf the internet as much, got more out of it?
The NHS have to do something! It's showing it's caring attitude even though the advice is outdated and wrong in so many ways!I expect they probably did, and sorry if I sound a bit intolerant but I didn't really go on the course to hear about someone else's cornsMy point was that there isn't much point in sending people on a course several months after they have been diagnosed, because quite a lot of them will probably have found out everything for themselves by then. I came back feeling that I had wasted three hours of precious weekend time when I should be with my family.
Hey ho.
I suppose the problem is that they can't change their advice every time some new theory comes along, even if it's the neatest thing since sliced bread (dumb simile in a diabetic context but I expect you get my drift). They have to be consistent in their advice, and are wary of being seen to endorse something just because it's new - after all, it could be disastrous to advise a high fat regime if current theories about a lack of correlation between saturated fat and heart disease turn out to be unfounded.T
The NHS have to do something! It's showing it's caring attitude even though the advice is outdated and wrong in so many ways!
But itts not a new theory! Even the Atkins diet has been around quite a while now. In the seventies it was 'leave the spuds alon and drink wine not beer diet'I suppose the problem is that they can't change their advice every time some new theory comes along, even if it's the neatest thing since sliced bread (dumb simile in a diabetic context but I expect you get my drift). They have to be consistent in their advice, and are wary of being seen to endorse something just because it's new - after all, it could be disastrous to advise a high fat regime if current theories about a lack of correlation between saturated fat and heart disease turn out to be unfounded.
To be fair to my GP, who is very switched on, and keeps abreast of developments in medicine, he advised me to go very easy on the carbs from Day 1. I will see what the Dietician says next Saturday - after all, he/she could have a completely different point of view from the nurse today.
Could not agree with you more I am not diabetic2 but my wife is we have been to meetings and Nuetricianal seminars all seem to be taken over byWent on the first part of a Diabetic Education course this morning. Three months ago (when I was first diagnosed) it might have been quite useful but I don't honestly think I was told anything I haven't already picked up from several months of web surfing and research in the interim. We didn't really get on to diet because part 2 (next weekend) features a dietician and a podiatrist, but there was brief mention of the balanced plate and eating starchy carbs with every meal. Whilst I'm not an evangelist for extreme low-carb diets and/or lots of fat, even I can see the absurdity in saying "eat quite a lot of starchy carbs" followed, five minutes later by "of course, carbs turn into sugar in the body". Anyway, we'll see what they say about all this next week.
Much time was wasted by several old codgers who wanted to share, in excruciating detail and at great length, every second of every visit they'd ever made to their GPs surgery whether or not it was relevant to what was being talked about. The "classroom" was overcrowded and in any event unsuitable for training, which the nurse (a nice girl) running the course admitted, but apparently they over-book, like airlines, because there are normally lots of no-shows on the day. Trust me to be on a course where everyone showed up
Still, it got me out of the house for the morning, I suppose .............
More anon.
So the NHS is still talking about starchy carbs with every meal; madness. I went on a visit to Jordan's Mill in Bedfordshire this week; well worth a visit. They talked about the healthy shell of the grain and the wheat-germ and the inner less healthy starchy bit. The tour guide said that the best bit of the grain i.e. the outer shell and germ used to be fed to the pigs 'they had the best bit' and the starchy bit was ground into less healthy white flour. The Jordan's family recognised this was not right and provided a choice of flours with the healthy bits mixed back in i.e. Wholemeal and Wholegrain. This was known donkey's years ago and to suggest diabetics have starchy carbs with every meal is quite simply 'pig' ignorance. Despite this knowledge, 75% of the population apparently still buy white bread; seriously starchy.
Not entirely sure what you're trying to say?
Jordan's bread is good?
Or bad?
Or wholegrain or wholemeal isn't starchy?
Or it is?
Or are you claiming you believe the NHS advise diabetics to eat white bread, not Jordan's wholemeal or wholegrain?
I think he's probably saying that Jordan's wholemeal/grain flour makes healthier bread than the processed putty that is Ye Olde Englishe sliced white loaf (and tastier too).
Whatever the failings of the NHS, when I last looked, they were advising that slow release carbs (including wholemeal bread/pasta, brown rice, pulses and - probably - Uncle Tom Cobbley) were better for you, albeit still carby and starchy, than white flour and its associates in infamy
I have obviously unwittingly tiptoed into a den of controversy, due to my limited knowledge of dodgy topics on here. Perhaps it would be best if we just let it lie?
Next thrilling instalment a week today...............
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?