Scandichic
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,708
- Location
- Hampshire
- Type of diabetes
- Type 2
- Treatment type
- Tablets (oral)
- Dislikes
- Michael Gove and his insane educational? policies!
To me that makes sense.what exactly are non dairy sources of protein and dairy?
So what is non dairy dairy - lol?To me that makes sense.
They are two of the parts of a conventional balanced diet as are the fruit and veg and starches mentioned in the same sentence.
Each is considered as an important element of a complete meal , they really stress this meal composition here in France. . So tonight I had chicken (non dairy protein), asparagus, spinach, (veg) new potatoes (starch), strawberries (fruit) and half fat crème fraiche.(dairy)
You may not agree with it but it's pretty standard advice in most parts of the world and probably came directly from a diabetes leaflet from the NHS or an old BDA one.
They probably append the same answer to all questions on diabetes.
I was just being naughty and having a bit of fun.....What if they had said, that is fruit and vegetables , dairy, non-dairy sources of protein and starchy foods ? I've changed the order but it's still the same grammatically with the food groups in the list separated by a comma and the last with an 'and' . The order they used probably makes more sense in terms of decreasing proportions for each group.
It just means you shouldn't use chees for your protein and have a diet of cheese soufflés or cheese salads followed by yoghurt for dessert.
* I'm an old fashioned Brit and would punctuate that sentence in the same way as Tesco did. (ie item, item, item and item). Apparently, the use of commas in lists is highly controversial and depends on whether you are a Brit , an American or a Brit that has adopted the 'Oxford comma' . It can raise passionate debate and twitter storms.
Anyway that's enough nit picking to start the day .(not sure of a suitable smiley so
Exactly! That's what the patronising muppet in Tescos failed to understand!To those saying you should know how to carb count- (not trying to be argumentative but just to offer the perspective of someone who finds it difficult), first of all, many people have never been taught how to do it at all never mind well (I only got on a DAFNE course when I specifically requested it after 13 years, I'd never heard of it until reading it on here). Secondly, as somebody already said, carb counting something you make at home is one thing, but estimating the carbs in a product when you have no idea what they put in it is completely different. I'm not talking about the filling, but the bread itself- how do I know what exactly they put in their bread (eg Subway known for putting something in their bread which makes it quite addictive, is that sugars? I don't know but just an example). I'm a coeliac so have to eat gluten-free, and some gluten-free bread is 40% carbs, some is around 65% carbs. If you're on very large quantities of insulin this might not make much difference, but for someone like me where I only need a few units for a meal, that could be the difference between 2 or 3 units, which makes a significant difference to my blood sugars. Furthermore, I've tried testing before and after the same foods and often get different results. There are SO many possible reasons for the difference (accidentally taking too much/little insulin, air bubbles, change in site of injection, illness, incorrect bolus ratios, menstruation, stress, activity etc etc etc) that it's hard enough working out what I've done wrong when I DO know the carbs were accurate, never mind when I have to add possible incorrect carb estimation to the mix!
I don't see why Tescos can't provide that information when all other supermarkets I know of do...
Type One Diabetes since 2001, Coeliac Disease since 2003 ish, IBS, and on and off depression and diabulimia.
Current HbA1c 11.7%
Not sure I agree with that point of view. What is the point of pouring money into research whilst at the same time surrounding the in-store population with harmful carbs and working with an organisation that encourages diabetics to have starchy carbs with every meal?Criticism aside about their response to the OP, Tesco's have done some marvellous work over the last year raising awareness of diabetes in their stores and contributing a whacking 10 million towards diabetes research:
http://www.diabetes.org.uk/About_us...d-customers-raise-10-million-for-Diabetes-UK/
Not sure I agree with that point of view. What is the point of pouring money into research whilst at the same time surrounding the in-store population with harmful carbs and working with an organisation that encourages diabetics to have starchy carbs with every meal?
Not sure I agree with that point of view. What is the point of pouring money into research whilst at the same time surrounding the in-store population with harmful carbs and working with an organisation that encourages diabetics to have starchy carbs with every meal?
Not sure I agree with that point of view. What is the point of pouring money into research whilst at the same time surrounding the in-store population with harmful carbs and working with an organisation that encourages diabetics to have starchy carbs with every meal?
I think Phoenix answered this perfectly, how can £10M be pointless regardless of where it came from?? I'm sure Tesco sell their "harmful carbs" to non diabetics as well.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?