The primary role of insulin is to regulate blood-sugar levels. After you eat carbohydrates, they will be broken down into their component sugar molecules and transported into the bloodstream. Your pancreas then secretes insulin, which shunts the blood sugar into muscles and the liver as fuel for the next few hours. This is why carbohydrates have a significant impact on insulin and fat does not. And because juvenile diabetes is caused by a lack of insulin, physicians believed since the 20's that the only evil with insulin is not having enough.
But insulin also regulates fat metabolism. We cannot store body fat without it. Think of insulin as a switch. When it's on, in the few hours after eating, you burn carbohydrates for energy and store excess calories as fat. When it's off, after the insulin has been depleted, you burn fat as fuel. So when insulin levels are low, you will burn your own fat, but not when they're high.
This is where it gets unavoidably complicated. The fatter you are, the more insulin your pancreas will pump out per meal, and the more likely you'll develop what's called ''insulin resistance,'' which is the underlying cause of Syndrome X. In effect, your cells become insensitive to the action of insulin, and so you need ever greater amounts to keep your blood sugar in check. So as you gain weight, insulin makes it easier to store fat and harder to lose it. But the insulin resistance in turn may make it harder to store fat -- your weight is being kept in check, as it should be. But now the insulin resistance might prompt your pancreas to produce even more insulin, potentially starting a vicious cycle. Which comes first -- the obesity, the elevated insulin, known as hyperinsulinemia, or the insulin resistance -- is a chicken-and-egg problem that hasn't been resolved. One endocrinologist described this to me as ''the Nobel-prize winning question.''
we always get told that it is THE latest FAD diet
Has anyone got a translation into english for this? It is almost unreadable and the author is trying to baffle us all with science.
I thought it was a load of cobblers, myself!Has anyone got a translation into english for this? It is almost unreadable and the author is trying to baffle us all with science.
There appears to be a hidden agenda behind it. I think I got the message that both the Energy In <> Energy expended model (CM) and also the Insulin causes obesity model (CIM) are wrong and ineffective in controlling obesity and fat accumulation. They pooh pooh the idea that ketosis burns adipose fat, and so end up with nothing on the plate except presumably Eatwell.
That's the "last" thing I would have said.I thought it was a load of cobblers, myself!
Agree. I would have said young and vigorous cobblers myself.That's the "last" thing I would have said.
Agree. I would have said young and vigorous cobblers myself.
Why do you feel this way? Did the article have anything in it that was evidence based that I missed? After all I did spend most of my time with my nose buried in a dictionary trying to make sense of what POV it was trying to make.
Oh the subtlety of it all. Such stealth! At last the penny drops. Your story reminds me of that sequence in Fantasia. Too many brooms up the bustle for my liking!I wouldnt give up a play on words for the luxury of speaking the truth!
As the cobbler said to his apprentice, "Get me that last!" and when the apprentice waited and didn't move he got a kick up the backside!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?