Not really.. insulin resistance means we are producing what should be enough but our bodies don't respond well enough to it.because for type 2's at least generally they are not producing enough
http://www.mendosa.com/blog/?p=3624
this is an interesting blog on the subject because it gies some examples of processed foods compared to natural foods and what happens with low fat foods -where the insulin index score is much higher than the glycaemic load.
I have seen that one as well. Between the two links it's pretty complete.
GO butter and avocado!!!
I do find that it is far more accurate and helpful than GI\ GL as I said. Some of the foods that I would t think would spike me ( cucumber for example) are high in the insulin index. And I naturally gravitate toward low II foods like Macs and pecans over other nuts. Avo
Strange carrots are so low. I use one baby one for a mild hypo haha. Wish peanuts were on there. I really don't eat them any way but just curious
I don't really understand the insulin index so if someone could she some light it would be appreciated.
I have just about got my head around BG. Taking mushrooms as an example with virtually no carbs - why does it then take a lot of insulin? In general do we not want to eat foods that cause low BG but do produce insulin - because for type 2's at least generally they are not producing enough.
Is there any data that says you have too much insulin - other than the c test?
No desire at all to re-open the shake debate.Not really.. insulin resistance means we are producing what should be enough but our bodies don't respond well enough to it.
So eating less often and then eating food that don't spike insulin (LCHF) leads to regaining sensitivity to insulin. That's why I'm not an ND fan. The shakes and meal 3-4 times a day spikes insulin too often. but we've had that discussion a few times already.
Some Type 2s don't produce enough insulin because their pancreas is wearing out. However, the majority do produce enough, it just doesn't work properly because of insulin resistance. It can't push the glucose into the cells for energy. Two things then happen. The glucose stays in the blood stream, and the pancreas keeps producing more and more insulin in a frantic effort to clear the glucose, but is unsuccessful, so we also end up with too much insulin floating about - and this in turn causes more insulin resistance and weight gain.
The best test to check if we have too much insulin is a fasting insulin test. Thuis is not done routinely on the NHS. We can have it done privately. @bulkbiker and @CherryAA and one or two others have done this recently. I am still thinking about it.
I can't answer your question about mushrooms - I wish I could because they are a staple food for me.
I don't really understand the insulin index so if someone could she some light it would be appreciated.
I have just about got my head around BG. Taking mushrooms as an example with virtually no carbs - why does it then take a lot of insulin? In general do we not want to eat foods that cause low BG but do produce insulin - because for type 2's at least generally they are not producing enough.
Is there any data that says you have too much insulin - other than the c test?
@Lamont D
Am I being thick? (highly likely) do you mean the insulin index for food or our own insulin levels?
You can have no phase one insulin and have insulin resistance, like me.No desire at all to re-open the shake debate.
It is interesting though to find out if you are resistant or producing too much.
The ND data shows that those on the study were producing hardly any insulin, no first phase hardly at all.
I wonder how they weeded out the people from the study group who had IR instead because clearly producing more insulin if they were all producing enough would have failed the experiment. Unless something else in the ND causes IR to wane.
So I ask again. Did the ND reject anyone that had IR. Because they "reversed" (and I know that will be controversial) through producing more Insulin. I am really confused now.Generally speaking people with diabetes will produce way too much insulin, just that like an alcoholic needs ever more alcohol, so does a diabetic need more insulin to do the same job. Eventually we are producing so much insulin that the system explodes and we can't produce anymore.
The kraft curves show this happening very clearly, as it gradually takes longer for the insulin to work. Most of us will be diagnosed somewhere along the 2-4 chain depending on how the symptoms manifest.
At stage 4, there are massive amounts of insulin circulating ,, it is only at stage 5 that the insulin has gone.
http://meridianvalleylab.com/Kraft-prediabetes-profile-patterns-overview
Maybe I am being a little dim herebut how do you estimate which kraft curve you fall into? Is it based on your own bg readings after fasting and then eating to see how you respond? I would say I am Pattern IIIB but my levels don't go anywhere near that high. My peak is normally around 6.5-7 at around 2 hours but can take up to 3 or 4 hours to drop back down.
Ok thanks @Bluetit1802, that would make a lot of sense ............ as I said, just being dim!!I think it is after taking an OGGT rather than your personal reactions to normal foods, as this depends entirely on what you eat. With the OGTT you start from a fast and drink 75grams of pure glucose, so everyone starts on a level playing field. If you haven't done an OGGT I don't think you can compare it to yourself.
Ok thanks @Bluetit1802, that would make a lot of sense ............ as I said, just being dim!!
So, as a diet controlled Type 2 how am I supposed to use this index?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?